January 30, 20215 yr 8 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: So? I don’t buy the white sox have some arbitrary financial limit. Adding two stars for only 19m You don’t believe they have a budget?
January 30, 20215 yr 11 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: So? I don’t buy the white sox have some arbitrary financial limit. Adding two stars for only 19m They don’t or do you refuse to accept reality? All posts on Bauer and Ozuna are just pipe dreams.
January 30, 20215 yr 27 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: So? I don’t buy the white sox have some arbitrary financial limit. Adding two stars for only 19m They supposedly only have $3 million left. Ozuna and Marquez will cost around $22-23 million in additional salary for 2021 alone.
January 30, 20215 yr 1 minute ago, caulfield12 said: They supposedly only have $3 million left. Ozuna and Marquez will cost around $22-23 million in additional salary for 2021 alone. Where is the $3M coming from?
January 30, 20215 yr 3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: Where is the $3M coming from? It’s caulfield so either his head or yahoo.com
January 30, 20215 yr 5 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: Where is the $3M coming from? Wasn't there a Tweet about it ? Then there was another Tweet about having offered 10M for Joc , he refused and Sox signed Eaton for $7 . That's a $3M difference . But then you have to figure they budgeted a certain amount for Hendriks that still preserved that $3M cushion.
January 30, 20215 yr I don’t buy that if an opportunity like this presented itself that some limit if 3m would stop it jr is a cheap clown, but not a complete idiot. maybe getting ozuna is wishful thinking on my end tho
January 30, 20215 yr Here is what I am for , let’s offer some scouts from Tampa, the cardinals, maybe even the twins a million dollars more than they are making and bring them over here so we can scout better , draft better pieces so in the future we can have an org that can trade pieces to get pieces. This thread should be dead before it’s gets Cruz like, it’s not happening .
January 30, 20215 yr 12 minutes ago, quickman said: Here is what I am for , let’s offer some scouts from Tampa, the cardinals, maybe even the twins a million dollars more than they are making and bring them over here so we can scout better , draft better pieces so in the future we can have an org that can trade pieces to get pieces. This thread should be dead before it’s gets Cruz like, it’s not happening . Crochet, vaughn, madrigal, kelley, robert, thompson, vera, coespedes all say hi. They have drafted just fine the last 2-3 years and their cuban work is unmatched. They need to draft some latin teenagers...that is all. The top end is working and they have 4 top 56 prospects they DONT want to trade Edited January 30, 20215 yr by EloyJenkins
January 30, 20215 yr 6 minutes ago, EloyJenkins said: Crochet, vaughn, madrigal, kelley, robert, thompson, vera, coespedes all say hi. They have drafted just fine the last 2-3 years and their cuban work is unmatched. They need to draft some latin teenagers...that is all. Hi back to them they were all good picks because we sucked every year, literally sucked and they were all top picks. Easy to get the best players when your picking in the top 5. Not fighting with you or anyone but we are a very top heavy org then then we have nothing. We should have had more while we rebuilt, way more . Anyway we don’t have enough pieces.
January 30, 20215 yr I agree they should have some more depth, but their drafting philosophy didnt change until 2 years ago. Its going to take some time to get depth filled in. Teenage prospects have such a high flame out rate though...and why they get traded so often
January 30, 20215 yr What does a deal for Marquez look like? Definitely Vaughn and 3 other prospects if the big guys are off the table? Stiever, Thompson, Dalquist on the table?
January 30, 20215 yr 1 hour ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: I don't think the Sox could get Marquez without trading Vaughn Then they should do it and sign Ozuna, I understand you wouldn’t wanna forfeit 6 years for 4 years or whatever the logic is against trading Vaughn but the goal is to win and win now, they can’t afford to waste more years of Grandal, Kuechel, Abreu, or Lynn by waiting for Vaughn
January 30, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, Rey21 said: Then they should do it and sign Ozuna, I understand you wouldn’t wanna forfeit 6 years for 4 years or whatever the logic is against trading Vaughn but the goal is to win and win now, they can’t afford to waste more years of Grandal, Kuechel, Abreu, or Lynn by waiting for Vaughn Not only that, but there is NO gurantee that Vaughn does anything of value for 2021 or 2022. He's still a prospect. A guy like Ozuna, on the other hand, just had a MVP caliber year in the big leagues and has had amazing years before. Monster hitter.
January 30, 20215 yr 2 hours ago, iWiN4PreP said: So? I don’t buy the white sox have some arbitrary financial limit. Adding two stars for only 19m Arbitrary financial limit? Good lord you are just making up reasons to be mad now.
January 30, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: Arbitrary financial limit? Good lord you are just making up reasons to be mad now. Huh? The entire narrative in the past 2 weeks has been the White Sox have some limit where they can't spend over 3m. That's absurd.
January 30, 20215 yr 2 hours ago, bmags said: Feels like Rox would love Crochet I would make that trade. Crochet makes me far more nervous than Kelley.
January 30, 20215 yr 3 hours ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: I don't think the Sox could get Marquez without trading Vaughn I think a big package around crochet also could get it done. On the other hand kopech doesn't make that much sense for the rockies because he only has like one year of control more than marquez. The rockies really need full 6 years of control guys.
January 30, 20215 yr 3 hours ago, bmags said: It’s caulfield so either his head or yahoo.com Clearly it was mentioned around here more than once in the last 2-3 days. But sure, I just made up an arbitrary number. I guess a few have spent too much time obsessing over “foodies” tweets to the point where idle speculation often becomes gossip becomes reality/perception. Yahoo Sports hardly ever creates their own Sox-related content, all they do is repost articles 85% of the time from other sources...but if you are a fan of a specific team, you might notice that local articles from sites like NBCSportsChicago come up more frequently on the news scroll. Edited January 30, 20215 yr by caulfield12
January 30, 20215 yr 58 minutes ago, Dominikk85 said: I think a big package around crochet also could get it done. On the other hand kopech doesn't make that much sense for the rockies because he only has like one year of control more than marquez. The rockies really need full 6 years of control guys. If he Kopech stays down long enough, it would be the rest of 2021 + 5 years
January 30, 20215 yr I'd have np trading Crochet + Vaughn for Marquez and going out and signing a DH like Cruz or much more preferably Ozuna.
January 30, 20215 yr 7 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: I'd have np trading Crochet + Vaughn for Marquez and going out and signing a DH like Cruz or much more preferably Ozuna. The problem is you’re buying Ozuna really high...if you look at his last five or six seasons, he hasn’t been tremendously consistent. Can we really afford to sink $15 million into a bat-first player?
January 31, 20215 yr 10 hours ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: I don't think the Sox could get Marquez without trading Vaughn Marquez is nothing special at all. It would be absolutely foolish to trade Vaughn for him. I’ll go as far to say there’s a decent chance that a Rodon (or similar signing) could perform as well as Marquez. He’s not nearly good enough to warrant trading Vaughn.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.