Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Josh Hader traded to Padres

Featured Replies

Shhhh.  You’re destroying the narrative that all these teams are perfect and running circles around the Sox!

good arms for the brewers ace factory. My opinion is they may have not traded at the peak of value, but I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't trade him at the peak of his performance.

 

18 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Profar would be second on the white sox in war.

Is that a compliment to him or an insult to the White Sox? 
 

Not saying he’s bad, just surprising that he’s the best OF’er on a team where the GM makes roster moves and spends $ like he’s playing MLB The Show 

42 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Whoa, kind of surprised MIwaukee deal him, but at the same time, that is a return.

Is there a precedent for a team leading their division by 3 games trading away an elite closer?

52 minutes ago, Sleepy Harold said:

 

Huh? Aren't the brewers in the hunt?

2 minutes ago, JoshPR said:

Huh? Aren't the brewers in the hunt?

They are but they also won't keep Hader past next year. They got 2 prospects, Lamet who maybe needs a change of scenery and another left-handed reliever.

11 minutes ago, JoshPR said:

Huh? Aren't the brewers in the hunt?

Hader going to get $15 million in arbitration and thats too much for one player with their payroll limitations in Mil.

Lamet provides a potential starter and swingman…had one great season and injury riddled ever since.

Plus they have a solid bullpen by committee with Devin Williams now getting most opportunities but also matchup based.

Ruiz will be a fourth outfielder, defensive replacement and PR.

 

Very very similar to the idea of Rays trading Choi in the next 24 hours to the Yankees, despite his being their second or third best hitter…or Adames last year, which was a bad trade for the Rays that backfired.  But they won the Ramirez/Paredes deal this year.

All under the radar type moves that never draw headlines.  Diego Castillo to the Mariners last year as well comes to mind.

Players get to Year 1-2 of arbitration and goodbye, with few exceptions.

Edited by caulfield12

20 minutes ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

Is that a compliment to him or an insult to the White Sox? 
 

Not saying he’s bad, just surprising that he’s the best OF’er on a team where the GM makes roster moves and spends $ like he’s playing MLB The Show 

He's the 9th best qualified outfielder in baseball this year by WAR.

Profar has been very good.

48 minutes ago, Jerksticks said:

Shhhh.  You’re destroying the narrative that all these teams are perfect and running circles around the Sox!

narrative? 

1 hour ago, almagest said:

This is also what you can do when you can draft and develop prospects.

Getting extra picks doesn't hurt. 

25 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

He's the 9th best qualified outfielder in baseball this year by WAR.

Profar has been very good.

That contract too expensive for Sox blood, but certainly much better returns than Leury/Harrison combined.  Same with the Kim deal being quite significant.  He’s an excellent defender and solid offensively this year.  Also could have played second for White Sox.

Profar basically saved them with Tatis and Myers out…and Grisham in a puzzling season long slump.

Edited by caulfield12

3 hours ago, CentralChamps21 said:

Is there a precedent for a team leading their division by 3 games trading away an elite closer?

They got a closer back in the deal plus prospects, pretty nice deal there. I would do it.

41 minutes ago, T R U said:

They got a closer back in the deal plus prospects, pretty nice deal there. I would do it.

I would 100% have traded Hendriks for the same.

White Sox wouldn't get 2/3rds or even 1/2 of that package for Hendricks because of the unique salary and tax structure, health concerns, age, and gopher ball issues.

 

1 hour ago, caulfield12 said:

White Sox wouldn't get 2/3rds or even 1/2 of that package for Hendricks because of the unique salary and tax structure, health concerns, age, and gopher ball issues.

 

Hader (7 in 34 innings) has allowed more home runs than Hendriks (5 in 35 innings) this year. In fact, in what's a down year for both of them, Hendriks has been clearly better.

That said, I agree that the weird contract structure would make things tough

13 minutes ago, Jose Abreu said:

Hader (7 in 34 innings) has allowed more home runs than Hendriks (5 in 35 innings) this year. In fact, in what's a down year for both of them, Hendriks has been clearly better.

That said, I agree that the weird contract structure would make things tough

If you watched Hendricks closely this year, nearly every single save has been a high wire act like Colome two seasons ago.

And Liam now has that red flag out there with the forearm tightness.  Plus, he's older.  Both probably suffering from overuse.

Finally, Hader is much more familiar with the NL.

 

And Hader gave up three homers in basically one inning of the same game 2-3 weeks ago.

Finally, how do you sell the fanbase on competing next year with Graveman, Kelly or Lopez closing?

Hahn would look like an idiot yet again.

Edited by caulfield12

6 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

White Sox wouldn't get 2/3rds or even 1/2 of that package for Hendricks because of the unique salary and tax structure, health concerns, age, and gopher ball issues. Rick Hahn would be satisfied with far less.

FTFY

Hendriks is valuable because he is under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, whereas Hader is under contract for a year and two months. 37 year old Bard just got $19M for two seasons.

MLB Trade Values

  • Hendriks $20.6M
  • Hader $15.5M

Edited by South Side Hit Men
Edit - Correcting for what Caufield pointed out. Thanks

1 hour ago, South Side Hit Men said:

FTFY

Hendriks is more valuable because he is under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, whereas Hader is under contract for two months. 37 year old Bard just got $19M for two seasons.

MLB Trade Values

  • Hendriks $20.6M
  • Hader $15.5M

Hader has 2023 control or never would have made that deal.

 

At any rate could care less if they trade Hendriks.

Just won't invest it in a quality RFer unfortunately.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/san-diego-padres/josh-hader-21236/

2023=arbitration year 4

 

Edited by caulfield12

Josh Hader has the highest career strikeout rate in baseball history, and while that’s at least a little about the era in which he plays and the way in which he is used, he’s still a 28-year-old who has the highest career strikeout rate in baseball history -- and he’s not even a rental, because the Padres can retain him for 2023, as well.

In case you’re wondering why the Brewers, a team leading the NL Central, might be willing to move him, well, you’re not alone. Maybe they know something we don’t; Hader, for what it’s worth, is in the midst of one of the worst stretches of his career. Maybe they think they can turn Lamet (30 years old) and Rogers (31), each currently struggling, but with not-distant runs of success in their past, into approximations of Hader, and get two prospects for the trouble.

Given that the Padres get the best player in the deal, and that they did it without giving up any of the prospects they needed to get Soto, it’s a clear win there.

 

www.mlb.com

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.