chitownsportsfan Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 The Sox' longest streak on record is 15 games. The longest streak in MLB history is 24 by the 1899 Cleveland Spiders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopek Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Hoping for 17+ but they'll find a way to screw that up. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitekrazy Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Weill I know it probably wont be 163, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 They aren’t getting swept in 4 by the royals. So it’s not gonna be soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted April 1 Author Share Posted April 1 12 minutes ago, T R U said: They aren’t getting swept in 4 by the royals. So it’s not gonna be soon. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said: Fairly confident they’ll get at least 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted April 1 Author Share Posted April 1 3 minutes ago, T R U said: Fairly confident they’ll get at least 1 Immovable object meets the unstoppable force. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rounding_Third Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Said it before, White Sox will approach and possibly break the record for worst winning % in modern history. The '62 Mets played 161 games and won just 40 for a .250 win% The 2003 Tigers won just 43 of 162 games for a .265 win%. Sox can beat both! So proud! Thanks JR, Kenny, Rick, & Chris! If Sox win just 21 games, they would break the 1899 Cleveland Spiders all time record worst win% of .130 Btw, JR's champion % is .023 (1/43). If that were a BA, he'd be sent down. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiddleCoastBias Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 After already seeing a couple 10+ consecutive batters retired, I'm more curious how many times we'll be no-hit this year. I'd set the line at 1.5 and lean to the over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 10 games to open the season. 0-10 start LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 I'm pretty concerned honestly that we are about to head into a 20 year streak of obsolescence like the 90s/2000s Royals. This just seems so far off from building back up, and zero confidence that this group can consistently make the right decision. Mena for Fletcher, the cease trade not inspiring confidence so far. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiddleCoastBias Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 47 minutes ago, bmags said: I'm pretty concerned honestly that we are about to head into a 20 year streak of obsolescence like the 90s/2000s. This just seems so far off from building back up, and zero confidence that this group can consistently make the right decision. Mena for Fletcher, the cease trade not inspiring confidence so far. Before I can say it'll be 20 years, we have to see what happens with the next ownership group. I agree that this is going to be a long seven years or so until the new stadium gets built (assuming that happens!), and then I feel like 2030 will have a wide-open outlook. Not saying 2030+ will be great, just that we're definitely going to see different people running it, so at least we have that to look forward to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 51 minutes ago, bmags said: I'm pretty concerned honestly that we are about to head into a 20 year streak of obsolescence like the 90s/2000s. This just seems so far off from building back up, and zero confidence that this group can consistently make the right decision. Mena for Fletcher, the cease trade not inspiring confidence so far. 1990-1994 and 2000-2006 were far from obsolescence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grinder Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 9-12 gets my vote. Its my optimistic side 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 4 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said: 1990-1994 and 2000-2006 were far from obsolescence. wow sorry I meant to say 90s/2000s Royals. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 8 minutes ago, MiddleCoastBias said: Before I can say it'll be 20 years, we have to see what happens with the next ownership group. I agree that this is going to be a long seven years or so until the new stadium gets built (assuming that happens!), and then I feel like 2030 will have a wide-open outlook. Not saying 2030+ will be great, just that we're definitely going to see different people running it, so at least we have that to look forward to. Hope so. He just seems like he'll survive another 15 years to spite us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimpton Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 19 hours ago, kitekrazy said: Weill I know it probably wont be 163, 'probably' but I won't put money against it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.