Jump to content

2025-26 NFL Season Thread


Recommended Posts

I mean, I get the timeline…but it’s still shocking that a 27 year old Sam Darnold led the Vikings to a 14-3 record in 2024 (4300 yards, 35/12 TD/INT) and Minnesota said “Nah, we’re good, let’s use a Top 10 pick on JJ McCarthy” 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Bears would have beaten Seattle for the NFC title but they definitely had a chance at beating either New England or Denver (especially with Nix out).

Seattle will demolish the frauds from NE though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony said:

I mean, I get the timeline…but it’s still shocking that a 27 year old Sam Darnold led the Vikings to a 14-3 record in 2024 (4300 yards, 35/12 TD/INT) and Minnesota said “Nah, we’re good, let’s use a Top 10 pick on JJ McCarthy” 

To be fair, they didn't know that Darnold was gonna do that last year when they drafted McCarthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drake Maye's TD today and huge run to ice the game, BJ take note please, so many 3rd and 4th and short failed opportunities...for f*** sake take advantage of Caleb's running ability to get easy first downs and TDs, he can even get bigger plays play actioning off of those plays. I will kill myself if I don't see Caleb running more often next season in those situations lol

Edited by MexSoxFan#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chw42 said:

To be fair, they didn't know that Darnold was gonna do that last year when they drafted McCarthy. 

Darnold had a great season in Minny, one bad playoff game should not be the reason you move away from him. He's gonna hold up the Lombardi trophy in two weeks...lol at Minnesota 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, chw42 said:

To be fair, they didn't know that Darnold was gonna do that last year when they drafted McCarthy. 

Yeah, I did sort of write that wrong. It was more the idea of deciding not to keep him and go all-in on JJ. I get it, hard to read what Darnold was at that point…but at the end of the day he was a 27 year old that just put up All Pro numbers for you at QB, and you let him walk for JJ. The ripple effect it has had is pretty amazing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MexSoxFan#1 said:

Darnold had a great season in Minny, one bad playoff game should not be the reason you move away from him. He's gonna hold up the Lombardi trophy in two weeks...lol at Minnesota 

I think the sentiment at the time, especially after their 2 straight losses to end the year, was that Darnold was just not good enough in big games and reverted to his old self when put under pressure. And that rang true even this year until their playoff games. That win against the Rams in the last few weeks of the season turned around Darnold's season.

I don't know if they were necessarily wrong to give the keys to McCarthy. If they really believed in the guy, they weren't gonna let him just sit under Darnold for multiple years. They did offer to keep Darnold on a short term deal at around the same AAV that the Seahawks offered him. But if you're Darnold, why would you stay for less guaranteed money and have a guy behind you constantly threatening your job? 

Obviously, it didn't work out for the Vikings. But I think their issue was more that they didn't have a true backup plan to McCarthy going to s%*# or getting hurt. Carson Wentz is not a viable backup to a guy who didn't play a lot of snaps in college and is coming off a knee injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony said:

Yeah, I did sort of write that wrong. It was more the idea of deciding not to keep him and go all-in on JJ. I get it, hard to read what Darnold was at that point…but at the end of the day he was a 27 year old that just put up All Pro numbers for you at QB, and you let him walk for JJ. The ripple effect it has had is pretty amazing 

It’s just, you better be absolutely sure on JJ.  And it didn’t seem like they were sure on JJ as much as they were sure KOC could make him into a pro bowl qb, and it did not happen at all.  If they didn’t have that defense, it would have been real bad 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...