WestEddy Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 32 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said: Is there a recap anywhere where I can read about Sox draftees today? Got slammed at work today and just now checking in. Thanks in advance. I think SoxMachine will have something tomorrow. I just read through this whole thread to catch up on the scouting reports. I was wondering what people here thought about the draft. Everybody seemed confused by last year's draft, not knowing who was over slot and who was the underslot to bank money. Last year's seemed to get a bad reception, here, as it unfolded. People seem a little more positive this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 The White Sox 20th round selection is LHP Andrew Sentlinger, from Virginia Tech! Sentlinger pitched out of a relief role for Virginia Tech before getting hurt, but he has a high carry fastball with great spin traits. 3 pitch mix from a high release point.pic.twitter.com/Z54d64lvaC — Dylan Barnas (@NotCease) July 14, 2025 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 Lot of pitchers again 11 if I've counted right. Only one is left handed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zisk Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 7 hours ago, southsider2k5 said: The issues were management and bringing in people to fit the kids. These same kids were all producing at high levels until said change and then they lost them forever. Can we talk about the make up of the ownership team instead? Nah, we'll use the assigned buzzword instead. So much blame to go around. The most important person in MLB is talent evaluator. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 59 minutes ago, WestEddy said: I think SoxMachine will have something tomorrow. I just read through this whole thread to catch up on the scouting reports. I was wondering what people here thought about the draft. Everybody seemed confused by last year's draft, not knowing who was over slot and who was the underslot to bank money. Last year's seemed to get a bad reception, here, as it unfolded. People seem a little more positive this year. It sounds like they didn't go cheap for no reason and drafted a decent mix of high upside and maybe some guys they can plug in sooner rather than later. I dunno, give it three years and ask again. I give it a straight C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 I love the approach. Keep injecting the system with as many up the middle bats, who can control the zone, as possible. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 Can’t complain about this draft. Looks like a normal baseball team draft. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 (edited) 4 hours ago, WestEddy said: I was wondering what people here thought about the draft. Everybody seemed confused by last year's draft, not knowing who was over slot and who was the underslot to bank money. Last year's seemed to get a bad reception, here, as it unfolded. People seem a little more positive this year. The first 6 picks look solid; they are all ranked and have nice write-ups. Very happy they picked Carlson. But I can't tell the price: how many of the subsequent 14 rounds were legit picks for their round. How many completely punted or semi-punted. Only one of the final 14 is ranked; each seems to have some skill and none look completely ridiculous, but 7 are college seniors. So I can't tell. And as I've noted before, in my opinion, a team in the Sox position has no business throwing away picks. They need as many lines in the water as they can get. If and when their overslot guys prove worthy of the price, then I'll change my tune. (And yes, I know how the draft works and I know that to pay players overslot you have to punt some rounds. That's the point- don't draft players who demand overslot. So far, they haven't proven to be worth it.) Edited July 15 by GreenSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 The LSU/Florida game I went to last year where I saw Cags hit a HR, I also saw Colby Shelton hit 2 HR, including one off of Kade Anderson. Funny, you go to one LSU/Florida game and you end up seeing several future MLB prospects, whether you realize it or not. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 How did the 2024 draft work out? Bonemer for sure looks like a keeper. Smith, McCants, a couple of relievers.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 8 hours ago, GreenSox said: The first 6 picks look solid; they are all ranked and have nice write-ups. Very happy they picked Carlson. But I can't tell the price: how many of the subsequent 14 rounds were legit picks for their round. How many completely punted or semi-punted. Only one of the final 14 is ranked; each seems to have some skill and none look completely ridiculous, but 7 are college seniors. So I can't tell. And as I've noted before, in my opinion, a team in the Sox position has no business throwing away picks. They need as many lines in the water as they can get. If and when their overslot guys prove worthy of the price, then I'll change my tune. (And yes, I know how the draft works and I know that to pay players overslot you have to punt some rounds. That's the point- don't draft players who demand overslot. So far, they haven't proven to be worth it.) You need to ignore the rounds essentially and look at the draft by bonuses. The Rhode Island hitter in the 7th plus the 9th and 10th rounders are seniors. Those guys are priority senior signs with some value but once bonus pools come out, I’m guessing those are really their 18th,19th and 20th picks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmy U Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 39 minutes ago, oldsox said: How did the 2024 draft work out? Bonemer for sure looks like a keeper. Smith, McCants, a couple of relievers.... So far, very mixed. Bonemer has been quite good, Smith has looked good but walked a bunch of guys, and Antonacci has been solid. But their Comp pick, Larson, and their 3rd and 4th rounders McLain and Saucke, have been hurt all year. Add to that that they drafted a ton of college relievers who need development, it could have gone better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 9 hours ago, GreenSox said: The first 6 picks look solid; they are all ranked and have nice write-ups. Very happy they picked Carlson. But I can't tell the price: how many of the subsequent 14 rounds were legit picks for their round. How many completely punted or semi-punted. Only one of the final 14 is ranked; each seems to have some skill and none look completely ridiculous, but 7 are college seniors. So I can't tell. And as I've noted before, in my opinion, a team in the Sox position has no business throwing away picks. They need as many lines in the water as they can get. If and when their overslot guys prove worthy of the price, then I'll change my tune. (And yes, I know how the draft works and I know that to pay players overslot you have to punt some rounds. That's the point- don't draft players who demand overslot. So far, they haven't proven to be worth it.) Get out of here nick hostetler 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 1 hour ago, Timmy U said: So far, very mixed. Bonemer has been quite good, Smith has looked good but walked a bunch of guys, and Antonacci has been solid. But their Comp pick, Larson, and their 3rd and 4th rounders McLain and Saucke, have been hurt all year. Add to that that they drafted a ton of college relievers who need development, it could have gone better. I still like McClain but it has always felt like injuries in that first year just end up making guys disappear and never come back. The exception in a big way has been Tanner MacDougal. But he's high school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 10 hours ago, GreenSox said: The first 6 picks look solid; they are all ranked and have nice write-ups. Very happy they picked Carlson. But I can't tell the price: how many of the subsequent 14 rounds were legit picks for their round. How many completely punted or semi-punted. Only one of the final 14 is ranked; each seems to have some skill and none look completely ridiculous, but 7 are college seniors. So I can't tell. And as I've noted before, in my opinion, a team in the Sox position has no business throwing away picks. They need as many lines in the water as they can get. If and when their overslot guys prove worthy of the price, then I'll change my tune. (And yes, I know how the draft works and I know that to pay players overslot you have to punt some rounds. That's the point- don't draft players who demand overslot. So far, they haven't proven to be worth it.) This is demonstrably false around baseball. Top players demand more money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted July 15 Author Share Posted July 15 Fegan piece on the draft. https://soxmachine.com/2025/07/mike-shirley-jim-thome-debriefed-on-white-sox-draft-class-pick Hodge is definitely over-slot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 (edited) On 7/14/2025 at 6:59 AM, Y2Jimmy0 said: It’s an important thing. If guys don’t give a s%*#, it’s tough to become really good in most cases. Yes, let's all become annoyed because players drafted are supposedly decent human beings who like baseball and work hard just to show your blase attitude towards the Sox any chance you get . SMH , as if the Sox aren't supposed to pump these guys up. Might as well be a 10 yr.old saying "Whatever ! " Edited July 15 by CaliSoxFanViaSWside 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 23 hours ago, Harry Chappas said: I am thinking of Brady Aiken becoming Bregman not a bad result. Probably but Aiken was a 1-1 pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 Something I don’t fully understand is why all these high school SS go so early, and then you get someone like Ahoy going towards the end of the first. Ahoy is expected to stay at SS I believe, and he put up crazy stats in the SEC. Half of the high school SS will probably flame out and become Nick Allen-esque Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 6 hours ago, Timmy U said: So far, very mixed. Bonemer has been quite good, Smith has looked good but walked a bunch of guys, and Antonacci has been solid. But their Comp pick, Larson, and their 3rd and 4th rounders McLain and Saucke, have been hurt all year. Add to that that they drafted a ton of college relievers who need development, it could have gone better. I think Mason Moore and Nick Pinto are injured, too. Phil Fox is looking like a bullpen arm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FriendlyNorthsider Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 The Carlson pick is a huge risk for a team that has had issues developing hitters but absolutely something that needs to be part of the new look Sox. Getting hitters with a low defensive ceiling and “near-MLB ready” bats just hasn’t worked. The superstar ceiling is easy to see. Absolute stud on defense. Elite arm, great movement and fluidity. I’ll be curious to see what they do to his swing. This guy has a good breakdown. The leg kick and bat wrap are going to be on the chopping block if he starts out struggling, but I don’t think I would touch it. Everything gets to the right place. His hands are so quick and smooth to the ball. Once he adds a little more to his legs and butt the power is going to be there. The adjustments he made to his swing already are night and day. He’s more efficient and the launch angle is there. Whether he can maintain that contact balance when guys are throwing high 90s with elite breaking stuff is TBD, but he has already shown his coachability and I think elite athleticism is a great indicator he’ll be okay. When I watch him vs Ethan Holliday I might like Carlson more. If he wasn’t 19 i think he could’ve went 1-1. For the Sox to be screwed by the new draft rules and still manage to get the guy that might be the best prep SS in the country is a huge break. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 (edited) On 7/14/2025 at 9:46 AM, Tnetennba said: Drafting good people is great and all, but we need actual baseball tools that translate. Since no one has really questioned the tools of the 1st 2 picks there's really no reason to be sick of hearing about high character players . Assholes are sometimes great players as are nice guys. Sometimes hard work increases your skills and lack of hard work or dedication erodes your skills. Nothing in the past dictates what happens going forward. This is true whether or not one chooses to believe it. Hard to tell where the organization goes between now and when the Ishbia's take over. It's not promising since JR likely won't be putting any money in the team and Getz, in that scenario ,may have to invest more in infrastructure than player payroll which seems to be what he doing now . Simultaneously he's trying to assemble more pitching talent that's available cheaply through other avenues like the Rule 5 draft and minor trades. Actual upscale hitting talent will need to be developed more often than it has in the past but the acquisition of international under 18 yrs. old talent has to be seriously upgraded to really consistently compete. This has hurt the Sox as much as any failure the organization has made, among many. Established MLB hitting will not come to the Sox via Free Agency until JR is no longer in charge. Edited July 15 by CaliSoxFanViaSWside Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 45 minutes ago, fathom said: Something I don’t fully understand is why all these high school SS go so early, and then you get someone like Ahoy going towards the end of the first. Ahoy is expected to stay at SS I believe, and he put up crazy stats in the SEC. Half of the high school SS will probably flame out and become Nick Allen-esque It's pretty rare for true college shortstops to end up going because those guys generally get chosen out of high school. 36 minutes ago, WestEddy said: I think Mason Moore and Nick Pinto are injured, too. Phil Fox is looking like a bullpen arm. Phil Fox has always been a bullpen arm. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted July 15 Author Share Posted July 15 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almagest Posted July 15 Share Posted July 15 3 hours ago, DirtySox said: Fegan piece on the draft. https://soxmachine.com/2025/07/mike-shirley-jim-thome-debriefed-on-white-sox-draft-class-pick Hodge is definitely over-slot. Quote Seven college seniors and/or grad students were selected to make room for prep selections that should require some over-slot bonuses, but of that group, Shirley insisted stocky small school masher Anthony DePino, the sixth-rounder out of Rhode Island, was a darling of the research and development group. I like to see they have an R&D group, and that they have input on later round picks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.