Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

9/15 GT - White Sox @ Guardians (5:40pm CT)

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Harry Chappas said:

To continue my whining, why not save Schultz to open today? I also think Schweitzer is better than Murphy.

Because Schultz likely will not be used as an opener

  • Replies 312
  • Views 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • The Colson and Mune stuff is tough to watch on both a fan and a human level. My guess is they’re mentally drained, making them way more susceptible to feel the pressure and therefore less able to make

  • chitownsportsfan
    chitownsportsfan

    Same people would be up in arms if Martin was only able to go 4 and Murphy had to go in to a medium leverage spot in a close game in the 5th. Will doesn't exactly have the 90s Braves staff to work wit

  • BigHurt3515
    BigHurt3515

    Not a Chris Murphy fan

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

You said it was “dangerously misguided”, “reckless abandon”, “negative critical mass”, and a “tipping point” and I asked you to expound and all you did was give me another cliche. Glad you finally got to the point

In a social context negative critical mass refers to the exact tipping point of (among other things) when someone or something reaches a specific amount of strain that triggers a rapid collapse. These terms were used often during the 1960’s. Ever hear of the University of Chicago?

3 minutes ago, Lightly Folded said:

In a social context negative critical mass refers to the exact tipping point of (among other things) when someone or something reaches a specific amount of strain that triggers a rapid collapse. These terms were used often during the 1960’s. Ever hear of the University of Chicago?

No please tell me all about it

Just now, Kyyle23 said:

No please tell me all about it

I didn’t go to school there. I’m just giving you a clue.

6 minutes ago, Lightly Folded said:

In a social context negative critical mass refers to the exact tipping point of (among other things) when someone or something reaches a specific amount of strain that triggers a rapid collapse. These terms were used often during the 1960’s. Ever hear of the University of Chicago?

You're very reddit coded. Soxtalk is not reddit coded, thank god. If you want to lecture people about non baseball topics feel free to leave the game thread and go to reddit where you can circle jerk to your heart's delight.

1 minute ago, chitownsportsfan said:

You're very reddit coded. Soxtalk is not reddit coded, thank god. If you want to lecture people about non baseball topics feel free to leave the game thread and go to reddit where you can circle jerk to your heart's delight.

Give me a break. It’s called Social Physics.

Just now, Lightly Folded said:

Give me a break. It’s called Social Physics.

You've got into the Ron and Caulfield bin. Ty for making it so easy. And ty to the our wonderful admins for the feature.

Does U of Chicago offer a cliche translation course, asking for a friend

22 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

Because Schultz likely will not be used as an opener

And the whole he’s not very good aspect. I’m sure he’s just up for mop up duties right now. Neither he or Urquidy is likely to pitch in a situation that really matters.

It may or may not work tonight, but it cracks me up how WS Twitter freaks out whenever an opener is announced. It seems to have been a huge success so far.

1 minute ago, fathom said:

It may or may not work tonight, but it cracks me up how WS Twitter freaks out whenever an opener is announced. It seems to have been a huge success so far.

That’s kind of why I was asking LF, why is Murphy some sort of Persona Non Grata? He has a good open and a not so good open from what I can see, both against Cleveland. You can tell that the staff has decided that they are just trying to shorten the game around the actual starter

7 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

Does U of Chicago offer a cliche translation course, asking for a friend

This is about what I expected. Enjoy your lunch. Lay off the punch.

Just now, Kyyle23 said:

That’s kind of why I was asking LF, why is Murphy some sort of Persona Non Grata? He has a good open and a not so good open from what I can see, both against Cleveland. You can tell that the staff has decided that they are just trying to shorten the game around the actual starter

Same people would be up in arms if Martin was only able to go 4 and Murphy had to go in to a medium leverage spot in a close game in the 5th. Will doesn't exactly have the 90s Braves staff to work with, He's trying to make chicken salad out of mostly chicken s%*#.

I think we have a better record using an opener vs. not using an opener, but not sure how to look it up without going through every game log.

6 minutes ago, Lightly Folded said:

This is about what I expected. Enjoy your lunch. Lay off the punch.

See ya later alligator

40 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

I’m enjoying the lame cliche responses lol

12 minutes ago, fathom said:

It may or may not work tonight, but it cracks me up how WS Twitter freaks out whenever an opener is announced. It seems to have been a huge success so far.

I don't mind the concept of the opener, it has worked. I don't like Murphy in that role. I hope he proves me wrong.

Murphy as an opener is a shrug for me. Cleveland is very left-handed. Part of Davis's improvement this season is that he's gotten better at getting lefties out, but it's still a weakness for him — and we still aren't totally sure which version of Davis we're getting. Murphy has pitched fairly well this year and has great stuff. And, importantly, I don't care about not having him available later in the game. That's a big difference from when the Sox used Taylor, Newcomb, and to a lesser extent Hudson as an opener. Murphy may or may not pitch well as an opener today, but I think it's reasonable to see him as likelier to throw the inning(s) more effectively than Davis and that Davis wasn't likely to go deep regardless.

So you've got:

  1. An unusually left-handed opponent

  2. A righty starter who you're unsure how much to trust

  3. A surplus lefty reliever

Go ahead and use the opener then. I'll make a note that Murphy doesn't have much in the way of platoon splits this year or in the past which frankly doesn't make a ton of sense to me given his slider-heavy approach. But yeah, let's see how it goes.

We DFA'd Urquidy, nice. Getz seems fairly good at just moving on from failed end of rester guys, certainly compared to Hahn.

Murphy's last 5 appearances:

5.1 innings, 1 earned run

Not sure why murphy decision is bad.

Davis struggles in 1st inning

Go Sox!

1 minute ago, DoUEvenShift said:

Glad Colson is not in the lineup today. But Doyle, Acuna and Rogers seem like automatic outs.

Edited by Lip Man 1

Antonacci batting sixth?

God that lineup sucks…and it could be worse.

9 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

See ya later alligator

Watch your toe in the commode.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.