December 1, 200421 yr Don't get me wrong I think the C Lee for Castillo part of the trade is great... However to give up Anderson for a guy who hit .244 last year. I mean call me crazy but i'd rather have Willie learning CF and hitting .260 with a .340+ OBP then those pathetic Posednik numbers.
December 1, 200421 yr Don't get me wrong I think the C Lee for Castillo part of the trade is great... However to give up Anderson for a guy who hit .244 last year. I mean call me crazy but i'd rather have Willie learning CF and hitting .260 with a .340+ OBP then those pathetic Posednik numbers. yeah...i would definitley take podsedniks 2003 season though
December 1, 200421 yr The problem is we can't give away Anderson because the guy had one good year. The guy could be a total fluke...
December 1, 200421 yr Off season survival guide Get happy / pissed when you see the guy wearing a White Sox cap and KW is smiling like he just signed Barry Bonds for $3,000,000 a year. For the really conservative types who do not want to get their hopes up, wait for Mariotti to tell you the guy sucks and KW could have had someone better but JR is too cheap and should sell the team.
December 1, 200421 yr The problem is we can't give away Anderson because the guy had one good year. The guy could be a total fluke... And anderson could never have a good year........ trust me I do like Brian but I'd definitely be willing to take that chance.
December 1, 200421 yr Pod isn't even worth Joe Borchard with a flordia prospect included if he's any good and thats saying something. To give up Anderson for him KW would have to be fired on the spot. Now you are just talking silly.
December 1, 200421 yr And it'd be retarded when we could pawn Borchard off on them for the same deal with the Flordia prospect invovled.
December 1, 200421 yr And it'd be retarded when we could pawn Borchard off on them for the same deal with the Flordia prospect invovled. How the hell do you know??
December 1, 200421 yr Could it be that Podsednik just had a bad year last year???? No, he is a career .265 hitter in the minors. http://www.sports-wired.com/players/profile.asp?Name=HFIG
December 1, 200421 yr The problem is we can't give away Anderson because the guy had one good year. The guy could be a total fluke... 1 good season > no good seasons.
December 1, 200421 yr why not take the gamble...What are the Sox predicted to do this year?? Cleveland's coming...and so is Detroit. It might pay off it might not either way....everett could play left coming from the bench and rowand goes back to center with dye in right. Anderson is more than a season from being ready for the majors.....aren't majority of the fans wanting something to be done now and not when Anderson's ready.
December 1, 200421 yr The difference is one is still developing and has a good shot of growing into a solid player. The other one played way over his head one year and has regressed.
December 1, 200421 yr It could also be he's a one year wonder. You want to take that gamble.. 70 stolen bases while only hitting .244, nuff said. EXACTLY what we need. By the way this thread rules. It took me like 25 minutes to catch up to the end.
December 1, 200421 yr Hey guys! Instead of wasting your time in this thread, there is a new poster here that you might want to welcome. philly54
December 1, 200421 yr The difference is one is still developing and has a good shot of growing into a solid player. The other one played way over his head one year and has regressed. Jeckle in which year would you like to win??
December 1, 200421 yr one year??....he's been in the majors for two full seasons...plus another 20 games the 2 before. Give him at least three to four seasons to show CAREER statistics.
December 1, 200421 yr Jeckle in which year would you like to win?? I want to win as much as anyone but I don't think Pod hitting .250 is going to go it for us...
December 1, 200421 yr one year??....he's been in the majors for two full seasons...plus another 20 games the 2 before. Give him at least three to four seasons to show CAREER statistics. Once more he is a career .265 hitter in the minors. Don't see him doing much better than that in the majors.
December 1, 200421 yr I want to win as much as anyone but I don't think Pod hitting .250 is going to go it for us... yeah... instead we can have WH hitting .250
December 1, 200421 yr Once more he is a career .265 hitter in the minors. Don't see him doing much better than that in the majors. That would be perfectly fine if he could steal at least 45 bases.
December 1, 200421 yr Once more he is a career .265 hitter in the minors. Don't see him doing much better than that in the majors. He did hit .314 in a full season.
December 1, 200421 yr I want to win as much as anyone but I don't think Pod hitting .250 is going to go it for us... Anderson won't even be here in 2005. Podsenik and Castillo would be added...and lee would be subtracted in the deal. Plus the possibility of signing Dye to give some more power. 0-1(Lee)+3(Pods, Castillo, and Dye)="Ozzieball" in 2005
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.