Jump to content

2013 April White Sox Catch-All Thread


witesoxfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

The White Sox were 17-21 on May 18th last year. They looked like a mediocre, terrible, .500 team. In fact, it was actually a pretty damn good team that had a pretty terrible collapse over the last 2 weeks of the season that brought them to only 8 games over .500 (Pyth W-L was 88-74).

 

They don't look good right now, but in 2 weeks time, they could look great. It's a long season, and anyone making judgment calls right now is doing the same thing as predicting the entire Bears' season based off of 1 game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 04:02 PM)
The White Sox were 17-21 on May 18th last year. They looked like a mediocre, terrible, .500 team. In fact, it was actually a pretty damn good team that had a pretty terrible collapse over the last 2 weeks of the season that brought them to only 8 games over .500 (Pyth W-L was 88-74).

 

They don't look good right now, but in 2 weeks time, they could look great. It's a long season, and anyone making judgment calls right now is doing the same thing as predicting the entire Bears' season based off of 1 game.

To be fair, around May 18th, the Sox also had gotten what, a .400 OPS out of 3rd base?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 03:02 PM)
The White Sox were 17-21 on May 18th last year. They looked like a mediocre, terrible, .500 team. In fact, it was actually a pretty damn good team that had a pretty terrible collapse over the last 2 weeks of the season that brought them to only 8 games over .500 (Pyth W-L was 88-74).

 

They don't look good right now, but in 2 weeks time, they could look great. It's a long season, and anyone making judgment calls right now is doing the same thing as predicting the entire Bears' season based off of 1 game.

 

I said it before. I'll keep saying it...

 

We need 50 wins by July 8 to have a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 03:14 PM)
I said it before. I'll keep saying it...

 

We need 50 wins by July 8 to have a chance.

 

The reality is that all of our games against the Tigers come in the second half of the season. Unless we bomb the first half of the season, we have a chance in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 03:43 PM)
The reality is that all of our games against the Tigers come in the second half of the season. Unless we bomb the first half of the season, we have a chance in the second half.

 

Yeah, but the Sox can't beat them. It ridiculous to think we'll go better than 8-11 vs the Tigers.

 

Sox have to go 50-38 before playing the Tigers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 09:48 PM)
Yeah, but the Sox can't beat them. It ridiculous to think we'll go better than 8-11 vs the Tigers.

 

Sox have to go 50-38 before playing the Tigers.

 

 

Hopefully the Sox players don't share your pessimism ;)

Edited by elrockinMT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 12, 2013 -> 03:48 PM)
Yeah, but the Sox can't beat them. It ridiculous to think we'll go better than 8-11 vs the Tigers.

 

Sox have to go 50-38 before playing the Tigers.

 

If you honestly believe that, you won't be watching much baseball this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 13, 2013 -> 05:39 AM)
MLB OBP

 

1. Detroit, .362

28. SOX, .280

29. CUBS, .265

 

 

MLB BB

 

1. OAK/ARIZONA, 42

2. SOX, 15

 

 

MLB ERRORS

 

3. SOX, 9

30. Tigers, 1

Yet the Tigers are only 1 game in front of the Sox. Bodes well as we all know the Sox will hit and catch the ball better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 12:04 PM)
Wait. We know that?

It's hard for us to be worse on some of these levels. We have the lowest OBP in baseball right now of .273. Last year these same players were at .317 for the year, and that's with a .280 OBP out of 3b for the full year.

 

The same thing can be said about Detroit's bullpen. They may not be good, but they're not going to put up a 5.59 ERA the whole year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 12:18 PM)
It's hard for us to be worse on some of these levels. We have the lowest OBP in baseball right now of .273. Last year these same players were at .317 for the year, and that's with a .280 OBP out of 3b for the full year.

 

The same thing can be said about Detroit's bullpen. They may not be good, but they're not going to put up a 5.59 ERA the whole year.

 

Addison Reed can stay at 0, but Chris Sale has to come down from 5.21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An article titled "White Sox need to stop swinging so much"

There's a big issue going on here with the White Sox: They've drawn just 16 walks in 12 games, the major reason they're 13th in the AL in runs scored despite ranking third in home runs. That's 14 fewer walks than any other AL club. Besides Dunn, the major culprits are notorious free swingers Dayan Viciedo (no walks in 34 PAs) and Alexei Ramirez (one in 46 PAs), plus Conor Gillaspie (none in 27 PAs) and Alejandro De Aza (two in 52 PAs). It's simple, really: It's difficult to string together big innings without getting guys on base, so unless you're hitting for a high average (which the White Sox aren't), you need some walks mixed in.

 

The White Sox are drawing walks at less than half the pace they did last year, when they ranked 11th in the AL in walk percentage. Here's how the White Sox have fared offensively the past five years:

 

2013: 15th in walk rate (3.7%), 3rd in home runs, 13th in runs

2012: 11th in walk rate (7.5%), 3rd in home runs, 4th in runs

2011: 8th in walk rate (7.7%), 9th in home runs, 11th in runs

2010: 12th in walk rate (7.6%), 4th in home runs, 7th in runs

2009: 6th in walk rate (8.7%), 6th in home runs, 12th in runs

 

This could just be a blip in early scheduling -- they've faced a lot of strike-throwers so far with the likes of James Shields, Blake Beavan, Felix Hernandez, Hisashi Iwakuma, Jordan Zimmermann and Dan Haren, but it's still a troubling sign. The White Sox rank 11th in swing percentage on pitches outside the zone but first in percentage of swings -- meaning they swing at more pitches than any other club. The White Sox scored runs last season because they hit 211 home runs, but that's a precarious way to make a living. If they don't come close to that figure again they're not going to finish fourth in runs scored again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a weird thought last night that I wanted to record here, just in case it happens. Seattle sours on Jesus Montero because Zunino keeps raking and they extend a revived Kendrys Morales. Sox acquire Montero over the offseason for some pitching prospects because Flowers isn't very good and Konerko retires and they figure he can play first if he never learns to catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Apr 16, 2013 -> 11:55 AM)
I had a weird thought last night that I wanted to record here, just in case it happens. Seattle sours on Jesus Montero because Zunino keeps raking and they extend a revived Kendrys Morales. Sox acquire Montero over the offseason for some pitching prospects because Flowers isn't very good and Konerko retires and they figure he can play first if he never learns to catch.

 

Are we certain that Montero is any better than Tyler Flowers? He hasn't proven anything on the MLB level yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 16, 2013 -> 12:03 PM)
Are we certain that Montero is any better than Tyler Flowers? He hasn't proven anything on the MLB level yet.

 

Ditto. Wouldn't give up starting pitching prospects for him. Replacement for Konerko has to be a youngish player with credentials to be middle-of-the-order hitter. Yep, easier said than done, but that's what it has to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...