All Activity
- Past hour
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
Selling would be the single dumbest thing this franchisee could do. First, we don’t really have much to sell outside of Newcomb & possible Hicks. Second, it would be the ultimate gut punch to a young team that’s in the thick of a playoff race and a fan base that is finally excited about the state of the franchise.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
This Gonzalez take is wild. Have you been watching the games? He looks like a plus major league hitter who can play anywhere in the infield. Multiple talent evaluators like Keith Law & Kiley McDaniel are believers. He had a rough stretch where stance got out of whack and has been insane ever since. Not sure how anyone could have watched him over the last two weeks and come to this concussion.
- Today
-
White Sox win draft lottery, will pick #1 in 2026
Grok also chose Emerson Yes, I can offer an independent analysis based on available scouting data, team context, and risk/reward profiles—beyond just aggregating pundit consensus. The 2026 MLB Draft begins July 11 (first round and more on Day 1), and the White Sox hold the No. 1 overall pick after winning the lottery. cbssports.com baseballamerica.com White Sox Context and Needs The White Sox have endured multiple terrible seasons (including a record 121 losses in 2024 and another poor year in 2025). They are in full rebuild mode, emphasizing high-upside talent that can contribute in 2–4+ years while building a sustainable core. Key existing pieces include young arms like Noah Schultz and recent draftees like Billy Carlson (SS, 2025), but the system lacks elite position-player depth at the top, especially impact bats who can stick at premium positions. mlb.com With the #1 pick and a solid bonus pool (~$17.6M), they can afford to reach slightly for fit or take the highest-upside player available. They don’t need to prioritize “safe” MLB-ready contributors immediately—though college players offer faster timelines. Top Candidates for #1 Overall The class features debate at the top among three strong but imperfect options: Roch Cholowsky (UCLA SS), Grady Emerson (HS SS, Texas commit), and Vahn Lackey (Georgia Tech C). Industry boards and mocks show Cholowsky as the slight favorite/former consensus #1, with Emerson closing the gap significantly and Lackey as a viable dark horse. espn.com nytimes.com espn.com • Roch Cholowsky (College SS, ~21 years old): Tools grades often in the 55 range across the board (hit/power ~55, field/arm strong). He’s a polished, athletic 6-2 right-handed hitter with plus defense at shortstop, good power (20+ HR seasons), and production in the SEC/Big Ten level (strong college track record). Low bust risk due to proximity and track record; he profiles as a potential plus regular or All-Star caliber shortstop. Concerns: Some reports note he “held serve” rather than dominating late, and pure ceiling might not be generational. espn.com nytimes.com • Grady Emerson (HS SS, ~18 years old): Highest upside of the group. Excellent hit tool (often graded highest), projectable power, athleticism, and arm strength. Left-handed bat from the prep ranks with advanced approach. Many scouts see him as the best pure hitter and most toolsy option, with potential to be a star shortstop. Risk: High school players have more developmental uncertainty and signability questions (though the slot money helps). He’s closed the gap on Cholowsky through strong senior-year/showcase performance. espn.com mlb.com • Vahn Lackey (College C, ~21 years old): Supreme defensive catcher with solid bat (hit/power ~55, athletic for the position). Catchers are scarce and valuable; a plus defender who can hit in the middle of the order would be a franchise asset. Good college production. Risks: Positional wear-and-tear (durability concerns long-term) and slightly lower overall ceiling than the shortstops. espn.com Other names like Jacob Lombard (HS SS), Jackson Flora (college RHP), etc., are top-5/10 but not strong #1 contenders. My Independent Recommendation: Take Grady Emerson at #1 Best choice: Grady Emerson. Here’s why, weighing talent, fit, and rebuild realities: • Highest long-term upside for a rebuilding team: The White Sox need stars, not just solid regulars. Emerson’s combination of hit tool, power projection, and athleticism at a premium position gives him the best chance to be an MVP-caliber player. In a thin class at the absolute top, betting on the toolsy prep bat with momentum makes sense—especially with the financial flexibility to secure him. • Position and system fit: Shortstop is a premium spot. Adding another high-upside SS (alongside recent picks) creates depth/trade chips. Emerson’s youth aligns with a multi-year window. • Risk assessment: While college players like Cholowsky are “safer,” the floor/upside math favors Emerson for a bottom-dwelling team. Lackey is appealing for positional value but has the lowest ceiling of the three and inherent catcher risks. Cholowsky is excellent and the “safe” pick many expect, but he feels more like a very good #1 than a potential transcendent talent. • Draft realities: White Sox scouting comments indicate it’s genuinely a three-way race up to the end. Emerson has reportedly narrowed or surpassed Cholowsky on some boards. espn.com If signability or medicals create issues, pivot accordingly—but slot value should get it done. Cholowsky would be a very strong, low-regret alternative (and the choice if prioritizing immediate polish and defense). Lackey is the contrarian high-floor pick if they love the catcher profile. Bottom line: For a team with the #1 pick in a rebuild, swing for the highest-upside talent. Emerson best fits that mandate and gives Chicago the best shot at landing a future cornerstone. The class has good depth after the top few, so they should add more arms and bats in later rounds to complement this selection. The draft will be fascinating to watch unfold
-
White Sox win draft lottery, will pick #1 in 2026
I’d be pretty solid on Roch if he played in the SEC, but with a little regressed year in the Big 10 from his sophomore year, there’s certainly food for thought that is fair to explore. We probably won’t complain either way, but it’s gonna be hindsight city for a long while
-
White Sox win draft lottery, will pick #1 in 2026
Proven wooden bat, OR high level NCAA production. But Gemini had a glitch for sure
-
2026 MILB Catch-All
Gotta get that trade value up! Hopefully McDougal and the Smiths can provide pitching staff reinforcements.
-
Mike Vasil "The Wizard"
He had a medical incident with his magic wand.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
Hicks isn’t getting you anything. He’s owed too much money and has a 1.66 WHIP. Maybe he was worth Sandlin but no team is taking him on at $12 million for next season. I’d definitely be open to trade Gonzalez and Meidroth, as I wouldn’t mind seeing Antonacci moved to 2B since he has more OBP and power potential than Meidroth, but I doubt they would net much. Meidroth looks like a good backup utility infielder. Jacob Gonzalez looks like an infielder that had one hot half season at AAA. Unfortunately, other teams aren’t stupid…
-
White Sox win draft lottery, will pick #1 in 2026
Consequence of draft being pushed back so far.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
Now if we moved someone like Hicks or Gonzalez of even traded a Meidroth for a different need I am fine as long as it wasn’t a short sighted move.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
I’m staying put but would he fine with long term buys for just good value moves or even swapping players for fits. Im patient and now isn’t time to panic or aggressively buy.
-
Mike Vasil "The Wizard"
I noticed he wasn't in the dugout in the last few innings of today's game.
-
2026 MILB Catch-All
Some good stuff from Fegan via SoxMachine. Updates come from Janish. McDougall will finish the year in a relief role and be on the big league team when he’d adapted to reliever life Hagen Smith will likely mirror McDougal but that’s not for sure yet. Said he feels good Thorpe is back throwing, but may not reach the bigs this season bc of appendectomy. S. Smith is on a good trajectory. Billy Carlson will start a rehab in Arizona on Saturday.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
I am fine staying put unless you are trading a vet like Beni or Grichuk or Hicks. Or buying a pitcher with at least another year of control
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
I disagree. Not at 33. We’d be paying for current performance as he hits the wall. I can’t imagine him not going to free agency. Although in hindsight, this would have been a better idea than giving Ser Loser $20 million guaranteed.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
Oh geez! We got swept by a pretty hot BoSox and you're ready to sell sell sell! When I saw who The BoSox were throwing at us in the1st 2 games, I knew we were in trouble. Can we at least get Muni back before panicking?
-
7/9 Games
Yeah I think you have to considering his age and the success he’s had/having. Rough one for Pierce George in an otherwise very promising season. McDougall had a nice inning in relief of Cannon. No baserunners and a K in one inning.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
I’d be looking to extend Newcomb rather than trade him.
-
Gamethread: 7/9/26 Sox @ Sox, 1:10
Unfortunately for your dream, you actually participate in conversation and don’t just do just drive-by s%*# posts like the goob. Despite your PCA man crush you are safe.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
You need a stay put option.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
There is nobody even worth selling except for Newcomb and potentially Hicks if you can find a sucker to take him. Maybe Grichuk. Everyone else is part of what they are building.
-
After the recent play, is the smart move to sell instead of buy?
We've all been talking about adding to this team so we can compete. The team started hot and were fun as hell to watch. However, the recent play by the team was a b**** smack back to reality. We've got some nice pieces, but are we ready to compete? I'm not so sure. Is the smart play to sell some players to acquire talent that will help in a year or two? We haven't been great at developing starters. Should we sell our bullpen pieces for more talent? Taylor could potentially fetch a haul. Newcombe has been dy-no-mite. Hudson has been solid. Hicks looks FILTHY and is building his value daily. Do we sell off our bullpen for pieces that will help in the next couple seasons? I'm leaning towards yes.
-
“The 78” is alive and well for the Sox, Bears are 'advancing' Hammond development
Forgot about that thing. It did earn a Wikipedia page though… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Spire
-
2026 MLB Catch All (Non Sox, Non AL Central)
Another day, another double and a BB. .930 OPS. 5.8 fWAR nearing the All-Star break. Insanity.
-
7/9 Games
Hard to do that with Bonemer's more limited defensive tools/speed/arm...