Are you completely clueless as to modern lingo? I’m not 70 yet but I am pretty sure I understood what he was getting at.
No GM that just set a record for futility should be fluffed and stroked as much as Getz is by some.
Oh wait, I’m being homophobic and calling people who like Getz gay! 🤣
@chitownsportsfan already explained this in his previous post. The Sox were an 80+ win team for years before 2005. They made some trades and acquisitions that led to the perfect storm of everyone playing well for that one year. Teams make acquisitions every year. That doesn’t mean it was a rebuild.
Facts in your own mind perhaps…
No one but you could look at that 2005 Sox roster and say it was the result of a rebuild…
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CHW/2005.shtml
I’m still laughing that the 2005 White Sox World Series was the result of a rebuild that started in the 1990’s. 🤣
I always thought it was a combination of acquisitions that all surprisingly panned out in a pretty flukish season.
Continuous rebuilds to maximize profits for Jerry until he sells the team / passes away. If this second rebuild fails, rinse and repeat with a third one.
The guy does the postgame show, along with Frank and Podsednik. Pretty sad that the Sox couldn’t get them to go. Hell, they couldn’t even get Bacon to go.
Well said. Ultimately performance and results matter. If a high level executive of a company makes a decision that completely tanks their business, no one is going to say, “aw shucks, his process was sound but it just didn’t go his way!” Ridiculous.
That’s only because the Sox haven’t had any position players that have retained or increased their value toward the end of their contracts. If Moncada and Eloy were actually performing, Hahn/Getz would have looked to move them for prospects. Instead, only Eloy could be dumped for almost nothing.
The Sox have to crawl before they walk. There’s not a doubt in my mind that the Sox won’t be signing a $200+ million dollar contract before they sign a $100+ million dollar contract. I don’t need Getz to explicitly say it to know that’s what will eventually happen.
The point is that Andrew Vaughn was never good. Producing a list of equally bad first basemen, most of whom are nearing retirement, doesn’t make 26 year old Vaughn look any better.