qwerty

QUOTE(jerseysox @ May 29, 2005 -> 03:35 PM) and i'll bet ANYTHING paul konerko makes the all-star team. I bet you are into drugs too.

Podsednik has looked really good at the plate lately.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ May 29, 2005 -> 02:27 PM) I can't say that I like this guy's strike-zone, but at least he's consistent with it. He's giving Jon the same pitches that he's giving Park. What i am saying raise the strike zone to say the letters rather than the damn ankles. It is ridiculous to say the least.

The current strike zone in the mlb sucks ass.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ May 29, 2005 -> 02:15 PM) The package for Garcia wasn't huge, and it looks a lot better now that Olivo has been absolutely atrocious in Seattle. Reed was the only top-notch guy we gave up, as Morse was viewed (by some here) as a guy that was still developing and still, might have to make the move to a different position. They could always move Fields to first, too. I think Konerko/Fields would be a good start... I still don't understand why they would trade for a player that is a free agent at the end of the year. They want top notch prospects ( major league ready) in return for helton. Not the paul konerko's of the world.

QUOTE(fathom @ May 29, 2005 -> 02:03 PM) Well, Delgado was a FA after the season, so there was no worry about his contract. As for Walker....the Rockies were willing to pick up a huge portion of his salary in a trade. The Rockies have already said they won't pick up any of Helton's contract if he's traded. Man did the rockies eat a s*** load of money or what?

Uribe singles home rowand. 3-1 sox.

Cruddy wo0t...

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 29, 2005 -> 02:01 PM) Out of curiosity who would you say the champion Pistons build around? Can't be anyone other than elden campbell?

Pierz with an upper tank shot 1-1.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ May 28, 2005 -> 10:41 AM) It's going to cost B-Mac AND Anderson to get Huff, don't worry about that. He is not that good and i love the guy.

http://www.themick.com/10homers.html#Home%20Run%20#1 Here is another picture of the fourth longest homerun of his...

QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ May 28, 2005 -> 01:25 AM) He was a producer. On an interesting note the movie's original title was Danny The Dog and the director's name is Louis Leterrier which translates to Louis The Terrier Doesn't it go by danny the dog in france still?

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ May 28, 2005 -> 03:45 AM) SnR still undefeated for the season? No, i know they lost at least once.

QUOTE(YASNY @ May 28, 2005 -> 03:16 AM) If I'm not mistaken, and I may very well be, didn't this kid pitch well against us in Chicago? His only other start against the sox was last year when the rangers were at home. He gave up six earned runs in four and a third innings.

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ May 28, 2005 -> 03:51 AM) Don't you think he'd like to get out of a situation where he is almost guaranteed to never win, and go to one where he atleast has a shot? If I had to take a guess, I'd say he would accept almost any trade, unless it were going to like Tampa Bay or Kansas City - hell, he may even accept a trade to KC. Most likely. But what i never understand is when great players resign with s***ty teams when they could have easily gotten as much if not more from a far superior team. Why would he except kansas city? Just for s***s and giggles or what?

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ May 28, 2005 -> 01:05 AM) Zoom, have you seen any Childress action? Have you looked at his game log since he got a starting gig in early February? Josh Childress The rebounding prowess from the SG slot, the excellent court vision, scoring potential, etc. Motherf***ing stud. And I like Smith even more. I see a freak defender in the making. The Hawks are a futures team in need of a PG and a 4/5 combo. I thought that they'd get Bogut for sure, and then hit the FA market for a PG and a PF. God damn, do they have some cap room. PGs take waaay too long to develop in the vast majority of cases...I'll hit the FA market for one every time. They have what roughly 20 million to spend this off-season? Anyway here is the list of point guards this year even though they will not get one from free agency.

QUOTE(Palehosefan @ May 27, 2005 -> 10:41 PM) Taft is apparently falling down many teams draft boards. But no way in heck does he get past the Knicks late 1st pick. Also there are rumors that Portland is fed up with their image and will clean house this offseason by trading or releasing Ruben Patterson, Zach Randolph, Damon Stoudemire and Nick Van Exel. Not sure if I believe that one though. They cut or trade randolph and i might just eat a shoe. They signed him to nearly a max contract i believe, it would make no sense considering he is the face of their franchise. Who they should look to get rid of is that useless piece of s*** darius miles. Is that guy a waste of talent or what? His personality also fits right in with the other losers there. Van exel has a team option for almost 13 milion next year which will not be picked up anyway in hell. Theo ratliff makes $11,666,666 for three more years with none of those years option years... in other words they are really f***ed. They should realistically start from scratch outside of telfair, przybilla, and randolph.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ May 27, 2005 -> 09:47 PM) Chris Taft will NOT be a 2nd rounder. Very true, but he is overated as all hell.

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ May 27, 2005 -> 09:00 PM) No, his overall record is 4 and 2 and he has a 1.69 era in his last 3 starts. The sox offense is definitely funking right now but Young's a good pitcher. Me

QUOTE(ChiSoxFan @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:57 PM) Does it matter that this guy is 4-2, and has had a 1.69 ERA in his last 3 starts? That seems hard to do.

QUOTE(sayitanitso @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:51 PM) Probaly the 35 year old third basemen, but whose career numbers are better? 2001 PIT 83 214 30 57 15 2 4 21 15 52 4 3 .266 .319 .411 .730 2002 PIT 136 385 57 94 22 0 16 48 42 120 9 3 .244 .328 .426 .754 2003 PIT 77 174 20 47 4 4 6 19 15 53 6 0 .270 .342 .443 .785 2004 PIT 155 491 65 121 22 6 17 75 50 114 13 4 .246 .319 .420 .739 2005 PIT 39 118 18 41 8 0 3 18 15 22 4 3 .347 .425 .492 .917 Career 490 1382 190 360 71 12 46 181 137 361 36 13 .260 .334 .429 .763 or 2001 TOR 9 22 1 6 1 0 0 3 1 4 2 1 .273 .333 .318 .652 2003 CIN 43 137 23 39 6 1 4 12 9 13 9 4 .285 .344 .431 .775 2004 CIN 143 505 74 140 21 8 3 28 67 88 37 10 .277 .375 .368 .743 2005 CIN 37 115 25 37 10 1 1 4 20 16 12 6 .322 .435 .452 .887 Career 232 779 123 222 38 10 8 47 97 121 60 21 .285 .378 .390 .768 I was talking about randa. Mackowiak is only 28 and not on the reds.

That is a f***ing ball rowand. It only bounced in there.

QUOTE(JimH @ May 27, 2005 -> 08:46 PM) qwerty ... yes they have been pretty bad but they have a lot of offensive talent over there. When they crank up their bats (and they will) they eat pitchers up who leave stuff up in the zone. I believe they have alot of players that hit over their heads last year but maybe that is just me. I said it before the year and i still believe it. how many players on that team have had more than one or two good offensive seasons in their entire careers? it was too easy to put together.

Stfu d.j. you are a moron.