southsider2k5

If the math is mathing, this dude is probably the biggest owner of the White Sox right now. He sure has a bank account that is somewhere around 10X of Jerry for sure.

I refuse to believe it.

that won't be around past this year, all so we don't have to play anyone under 30. Do we need 600 PAs to figure that out? Again, why am I supposed to be so excited about a dev staff that we are absolutely afraid to use? Hell there was a million other DFAs of guys with control past next season who were out there besides the ones that we couldn't apparently do anything with here. Why are we so damned scared of acting like we are trying to build a team for 2030 and not 2025? That's what you should be doing when you lose 121 games.

So a potential fifth OF that won't be around past this year, all so we don't have to play anyone under 30. Do we need 600 PAs to figure that out? Again, why am I supposed to be so excited about a dev staff that we are absolutely afraid to use? Hell there was a million other DFAs of guys with control past next season who were out there besides the ones that we couldn't apparently do anything with here. Why are we so damned scared of acting like we are trying to build a team for 2030 and not 2025? That's what you should be doing when you lose 121 games.

Neither is the rest of the roster, but here we are.

He's an imbecile if he thinks a marginal improvement in 2025 is more important than discovering talent for 2030. That's the entire point here.

Apparently MLB wants to make sure everyone gets the Comcast experience, aka blacked out. Maybe a mercy killing of the signal.

Not to mention that it IS the 121 loss season that dictates what this roster should look like. If we were an 80 win team, looking to get to 85, sure plug around the margins and bench every young kid. Knock yourself out. But we aren't. We are a historically bad team, with absolutely nothing to gain long term by playing any of these guys. Even if it is a 1% chance that Colas and company vs the Dunder Mifflin softball team guys's 0%, you go with the 1%. With as many times as I have heard about how we have hired all of these great dev guys, hitting coaches and coordinators and everyone else, why the f*** are we absolutely afraid to give them a chance with any of this younger players in our system?

I am not.

Other than Robert, our OF is godawful, and I refuse to pretend otherwise. Even if you want to make a case for a marginal improvement over a young guy, these are deals on 30something players who will be long gone by the time this team is .500 again, let alone when they are good. Literal zero chance of them helping the Sox to winning baseball. Why we should be excited to waste ABs on guys who will be on 16 inch fields somewhere by the time the Sox are good again is beyond me, and I am definitely not about to get excited about it.

Look, the guys who replaced them aren't anymore "major league calibur" than the guys they replaced. They are 4A players at best.

It feels like this meme come to life.

This is crazy considering how many of them aren't rookies.

That is interesting as I really did think this would be a hard contract to agree to with his depressed arb earnings, and his large separation between that and what he could be worth if he is a full time starter without injury problems who hit his ceiling.

I can see why we need a change.

I do see it as a purposeful misrepresentation of the facts at hand, especially with a complete unwillingness to go back and verify and also state it as an absolute fact without knowing. But in this day and age, I guess a lot of people don't really worry about those standards.

Seems pretty obvious to me that there is a difference between even saying this was a "great trade" and "He will be great", but apparently that is just me.

It has to be a HUGE number. I am sure they were already looking at a cut back from what they were going to make anyway just because of the crash in MLB rights, but they are missing some huge majority of their Chicago customers at Comcast right now. They stand a real chance at putting up an Astro's like 0.0 rating this year at some point.

I feel like we need the "they are the same picture" meme with Hahn and Getz.

Add into this the Hoosier Hysteria for Indiana HS basketball and you have it all.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Not going to. Could be. Big, big difference.

I don't know. I think broadcasting games this year might qualify as torture under the Geneva Conventions.

Hagen I think will legitimately be ready in a sooner time frame just because he has a decent history of pitching deep into games in college and an innings base. Dutch I am glad they are pushing back on because he is still going to have to learn how to be a starter in reality. Dude has never had to try to harness his stuff for 6 to 7 innings. It's a learning curve. Granted I am sure he has the stuff and physical stature to hold up, but he still have to get there both physically and mentally.

The first pick is a lottery, so no win total locks that in unfortunately. The best we can hope for is the most chances at winning the lottery, and cross our fingers for some Derrick Rose type stuff, and not some Eddy Curry/Tyson Chandler type stuff.