Everything posted by southsider2k5
-
New Reply System on Board
QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Jun 24, 2017 -> 10:29 AM) Where can I find the penis thread? http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?sh...52&hl=penis
-
Potential and Likely Draft pick busts 2008-present
This thread is more pre-mature than a virgin on prom night.
-
When the Sox are ready to contend in 2019/2020, who is the manager?
Any name other than Renteria is going to be wrong. If he isn't the manager, something went horribly wrong.
-
Cheers To The Southside by Mark Buehrle
Mark Buehrle in a softball league is the least surprising thing ever.
-
2017-18 official NBA discussion thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 05:50 PM) Holy s***. What a f***ing dick. He got pissed about the 2nd rd pick question. What did he expect?
-
Nate Jones
Nate Jones has felt pain-free for the past three or four days. He was being checked by the team doctor today and hopes to get ok to throw Per Scott Merkin via twitter.
-
New Reply System on Board
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 04:38 PM) I'm pretty sure it's because of the link in the Soxtalk Facts post to the penis thread. I'm also pretty sure that's the best sentence I've written in at least 3 years. 3?
-
New Reply System on Board
Nothing has changed. Your view must have been altered.
-
2017 Minor League Catch-All thread
FutureSox @FutureSox 2h2 hours ago Roster moves: OF Courtney Hawkins back to the DL. OF Jeff Gelalich activated from DL for Barons.
-
Fun Soxtalk Poster Facts
QUOTE (Brian @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 10:15 AM) Was the most popular thread.... http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?sh...amp;pid=1818385 Mark Buehrle is not an ace is right up there for me along with the Ronald McDonald thread, and a couple of others. But this is an all-time great.
-
2017 Draft tracker and signings
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 10:54 AM) Also LSU is still playing too, so the Kiel report can't really be correct. MLB office would not allow it, nor would NCAA. They may have, indirectly and under the table, agreed to parameters. That's what I was going off of with them being at the same school, I just assumed they must have lost... Oops.
-
2017-2018 NHL discussion thread
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 12:51 PM) I was sitting at the airport bar and my phone just started blowing up with these craziness. I totally get the Saad deal, he is more of a two way player and younger signed for longer. The Hjalmarsson day is pretty questionable, unless Murphy turns out to be a good player leaving the desert wasteland. It the Hammer deal freeing up money?
-
2017-2018 NHL discussion thread
Wow, what a crazy day.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (steveno89 @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 09:42 AM) A half season of good production does not make him worth a massive extension. I'd ride him out of the cheap and see if he can keep this up. What is the rush anyways? The "cheap" ends this year. After this year he will be "league average" and then "full price" the year after.
-
2017-18 official NBA discussion thread
QUOTE (Sox-35th @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 08:03 AM) It's hard for some because we're not all willing to dumb it down like you are. The game is complicated and these trades aren't made in a vacuum. Your inability to accept reality, that the Bulls wanted to rebuild and this was the best offer they had, is indicative of your lack of understanding, not our lack of understanding. It must be harder for some to realize that if this was the best offer you had, you walk away from it. It also must be hard to understand that you aren't really rebuilding if you are giving away not 1, but two picks in the same draft.
-
2017 Draft tracker and signings
QUOTE (flavum @ Jun 23, 2017 -> 10:19 AM) https://twitter.com/bldore/status/878252740782075905 Which means Skoug should be in the fold in the next 24-48 hours too.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 07:54 PM) Jake Peavy was pretty much on the decline by this time, and at the time they traded him, they were coming off the second straight month in which they had the worst record in baseball. Why the hell wouldn't they hand him right field? That still doesn't support any notion that he should have been offered an extension. The history you are referring to does not at all support the assertion you are trying to make. The White Sox have a history of offering extensions to players as early as possible. They have done it over and over and over again. Anderson, Sale, Jones, Santos, Quintana and so on. That history absolutely supports it. The White Sox value cost certainty for guys they see as cornerstones, and all you had to do was to listen to five seconds of a broadcast after they brought Garcia here to know what they thought of his potential. The rest is just revisionist history.
-
2017-18 official NBA discussion thread
And that's why I didn't want this front office making a Butler trade.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 07:34 PM) I just don't think he showed anywhere near enough to justify that...I mean he wasn't "their" guy either. He wasn't their draft pick like Timmy, and many of their other early signings were starting pitchers who had shown years of good performance. Avi never really had more than a few months of good play at any give time. They traded Jake Peavy for him, and handed him RF right off of the bat.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 04:21 PM) Please elaborate at what point in Avi's previous White Sox career you would have broached extension discussions? After he got booed at SoxFest? They would have the first year when they got him, just like they do with all of the young players they want to build around.
-
2017 Watercooler TV thread
Anyone else out there watching The Putin interviews by Oliver Stone?
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 04:04 PM) That April before he got injured (2014) in Colorado was the only time his play warranted such a discussion. And?
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (turnin' two @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 04:05 PM) Well, even if they offered it "early on" the situation has certainly changed for Avi (and the Sox) since that point. Yes it has. Now Avi is two season away from free agency and hitting like an all-star. If you want to get him extended TODAY, you are going to have to do something to get his attention.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 03:36 PM) I have to say, I think your numbers are quite high above, and I am utterly lost as a result of your second paragraph. What makes you think he held out? When do you suppose an extension was offered him? Bottom line, the guy is guaranteed the remainder of his $3 million owed to him this year, and probably a solid $7-8 million next year through arb. Beyond that, he is guaranteed very little. Offering him $68 million or so over 6 years allows him to have generational money with another potential shot at FA in his age 32/33 season. For a guy that has basically been worse than replacement level his previous 3 seasons, I suspect that is more alluring than you are recognizing. The Sox love getting their core young guys locked into long term deals as early as possible. I would put the odds near 100% that the Sox talked to him about it very early on in his time here.
-
Cafardo: Cardinals interested in Avi
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 22, 2017 -> 03:18 PM) I don't understand why it matters whether this is pre-arb or not. Yes, he will get paid in arbitration, but typically, an arbitrator does not want to award a massive increase from previous years unless there is a steady history of performance backing it. Avi obviously does not have that history. Many people were upset that we paid Avi $3 million this season. Do you believe that if after this season, assuming he continues along some reasonable range of performance similar to where he has been over his last 450 PAs or so, we went to his reps and offered something in the way of Jose Abreu's contract, that he wouldn't accept that? I think it would be highly compelling, and would be a far better use of resources than to trade him for dimes on the dollar because we were concerned about the risk. Garcia will be a $10 million in arbitration this year if he anywhere close to keeps up this season. The arb system isn't as much about raises as it is comps. RF's who hit .340 and put up .900+ OPSs get paid big time, and this is year #2 of arb when those numbers start to explode. Next year the same sort of numbers will get him in the range of $15 million, maybe more, if he goes through the arb system. If Garcia has held out this long to be extended, it tells me that he thinks he can get paid in free agency. For what it would take to get his attention and give up free agency, I am not willing to go there.