-
Posts
100,598 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
35
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by caulfield12
-
QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 05:35 PM) Of his first 28 pitches, only 4 were sliders. What the hell is with that game plan? Because he always gets ahead with the fastball and goes for the K with the slider. He's not used to pitching backwards, and Tyler is afraid to call them early in the count. They needed to make an adjustment more quickly than they did, that's for sure.
-
August 11th against Justin Verlander was the last time the Pirates scored five or more runs in an inning. Five runs on five consecutive hits. Now we have to sit here and watch one of the many reasons we didn't win in 2012 dominate our line-up, lol.
-
QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 05:32 PM) All 5 hits off of the fastball...nice pitch selection But Tyler Flowers frames pitches well, lmao.
-
Essentially one of those 40-54 games that is lost before it has even started.... Why the heck was Garcia playing so shallow? Took the wrong angle cutting it off as well. 5-0, nobody out. Is this the bottom? Probably not. One more base hit from being done. Flowers needs to talk to Rodon and calm him down. Noesi now warming up, Webb down. Sigh. Second triple in five seasons for Cervelli (thanks, Avi). Avi plays too shallow and Eaton won't play shallow, if it's not one thing, it's another with this team.
-
There goes the 11 inning scoreless streak for Rodon. The Pirates have been one of best teams in baseball the past 2-3 weeks (they've even managed to win four straight games while scoring just 8 runs, due to great starting pitching). This doesn't bode well...for the entire series. Not unexpected, of course. We've been wrong before about the team bottoming out, but -6 would be the worst record of the season (happened just once). Frustrating. Daniel Webb already up in the bullpen.
-
QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 05:16 PM) I'm willing to bet the defense would instantly improve if they flipped Melky to RF and Avi to LF. From there, I expect we'll see a new 3rd baseman here next year that will be better defensively than Conor. A problem that's lurking for Hahn is the team desperately needs to find better offensive players, yet they need defensive upgrades as well. Guys that are good at both are usually very expensive. See Heyward and Alex Gordon. So you're left with Upton, Cespedes and Zobrist. Limited options. As far as changing positions in the middle of the season...I'll believe it when I see it with our organization. They did make that decision with Alex Rios, but if I recall, it was Alex who initiated it after becoming frustrated and sulking (bad body language, etc.).
-
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 05:05 PM) Dan Hayes @CSNHayes 13m13 minutes ago #WhiteSox are minus-43 in Defensive Runs Saved, which is 29th. Philly is last at -45. The Yankees, 28th, are -22. KC is +42. @fangraphs That's why the Royals are still holding onto first place despite being terrible offensively the last 2-3 weeks and losing 5 games (+14 to +9) record-wise. Their bullpen (Herrera has slumped but Davis/Holland/Madson/Hochevar are compensating)...and, to a lesser extent, their comparative depth in starting pitchers. Joe Blanton has done very well for them, as has Chris Young until his last couple of starts. Guthrie and Vargas have been so-so and Ventura and Duffy have regressed and/or are injured. Kris Medlen is the wild card in terms of them making a midseason pitching move.
-
QUOTE (Vance Law @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 04:56 PM) Probably not. I was just listing the legitimate positive additions on the FA market. And I believe Alex Gordon has another option next year. I don't really expect they will end up trading LaRoche. If the team nosedives, Shark is the only thing that will go and bring a return. Bonifacio on a salary dump. Alexei won't traded and he'll be brought back next year. I'm 99.9% Gordon will be a free agent next season. (source: Cot's Baseball Contracts) 4 years/$37.5M (2012-15), plus 2016 player option signed extension with Kansas City 3/30/12, replacing 1 year/$4.775M deal signed 2/9/12, avoiding arbitration, $5.45M-$4.15M 12:$6M, 13:$9M, 14:$10M, 15:$12.5M, 16:$12.5M player option award bonuses, including $50,000 for All-Star selection salaries may increase based on awards, performance: 2011-12 Gold Gloves, 2013 All Star increase 2014 salary to $10.75M, 2015 salary to $13.25M, 2016 option to $13.25M 2013 Gold Glove, 2014 All Star increase 2015 salary and 2016 player option to $14M each So Gordon has the same choice Jeff Samardzija does (with a QO), basically, PLAYER but not a club option. He could, conceivably take less money to stay in KC for one year (if he completely nosedives from here on out), but time and time again a player will go for that big contract when they're in their early 30's. Shares the same agent (Close) with Derek Jeter, fwiw. As far as Alexei Ramirez, it does look like the long-predicted decline that was being predicted two seasons ago is finally setting in...
-
QUOTE (Dunt @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 02:49 PM) My optimistic view: 1.) Pitching and defense win championships, the Sox seem pretty flush in one of those areas and have some reinforcements on the way. They can continue to trot out Sale-Q-Rodon-?-Danks and have a decent chance of winning most of the time. If they can make some steps forward defensively, I think they can be above .500 with their offense staying at the same level. 2.) I think their offense will improve. Sometimes players just have bad seasons, I really dont expect Melky, Alexei, and Eaton to be this awful next season. I dont even expect Alexei to be here honestly. 3.) Whether it be a comp pick or a nice trade piece, the Sox will get something important for the future with Samardzija. 4.) You can fix next years team in free agency without breaking the bank. Want to immediately upgrade two positions? Sign Alex Avila and Howie Kendrick. Wanna spend big? Swing a trade of LaRoche to the Cards, then bring it Justin Upton to play RF and have Avi move to DH. 5.) Pitching will always be this organizations forte, but they will never be truly elite without identifying that the need to have excellent defense. Identify your weak spots and minimize their defensive impact on the team. There is no way Tyler Flowers, Conor Gillaspie/Gordon Beckham, or Avi should have starting spots in the field next year. I'm pretty sure the last time Avila was really good was 2011...his WAR over the last three seasons (not counting this injury-plagued one) has been 4.9 cumulatively, but I suppose HOPING for 1.6 MIGHT be an upgrade. Of course, that's if he is healthy...and he's at that age where catchers start to break down (AJ to the contrary). From 2011-2015, Kendrick was a VERY solid player, but he's fallen off the map this year with the Dodgers and will be 32 next year... They're not the worst ideas in the world (buy low candidates), but will they move the bar very much to justify the extra spending? Someone else mentioned trading LaRoche to the Cards, and eventually replacing him with Davis of the Orioles. That's also not a bad idea, but you still have a logjam of DH's in the outfield with Avi and Cabrera....and you're using scant resources to chase after the same players like Cespedes, Zobrist, Heyward and Alex Gordon that everyone will be targeting at top-dollar rates if you want to improve the outfield without a trade.
-
QUOTE (Vance Law @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 02:58 PM) I just hope the team goes one way or the other over the next month. If Melky, Alexei, Eaton, and even Sanchez (hitting worse than several pitchers) regress to the mean that should be enough offense to get back above .500 with the starting rotation doing what it should be doing. If instead you think Melky, Alexei, Sanchez, can be historically bad for an entire season, well, then we'll likely have dug a deep enough hole to be sellers in July. Shark will go and flipping LaRoche would become a potentially decent idea. We'd add player(s), free up money and just need to land one of: Chris Davis Jason Heyward Justin Upton Y. Cespedes Ben Zobrist Plug Davis in at DH or improve the outfield with one of those guys and push Melky to DH/OF. We're then back in basically the same situation as 2015 but now with hopeful improvement from Melky, Micah, additional players from Shark/LaRoche trades hopefully a new C and/or 3B, Beck/ E Johnson or a FA (Shark!) in the rotation with Fulmer knocking on the door. Since nearly every NL player goes bust with the Sox, better to stick with Davis, Cespedes, Zobrist or Alex Gordon. We aren't realistically going to spend Upton money next offseason anyway...not on just one player.
-
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 09:18 AM) Not Fullerton. Esch can pitch, that is for sure. Was drafted high himself (some rumblings that he was going to sneak into the back of the 1st but ended up going in the supplemental / comp rounds). His mate, Justin Garza, was just as good as he was with a more explosive fastball but underwent surgery about a month ago. I kept saying he'd have been a great pick but the Tribe grabbed him in the tail end of day 1. Santa Barbara City College and then UC-Irvine for Axelrod. Now starting for Louisville/AAA.
-
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:54 AM) The answer is none. You do not discount the likes of Abreu, Sale and Q. You are coming from a perspective of desperation if you are willing to discount any of those three to trade them. Other teams would be desperate to obtain them and not the other way around. While the Sox season does not look good, no desperation move(s) will fix the teams problems in 2015. Just accept it. Talk about panic mode. I'm not even thinking about 2015...at least not after this next week of play. It's already onto planning for 2016. Nothing to panic about anymore....they essentially have the worst offense and defense in baseball, and unless they use surpluses in pitching (Samardzija/Quintana/Putnam/Duke/Petricka) to improve that standing, there's simply no way they're going to make the playoffs in 2016 other than "hoping and praying." -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:45 AM) Most importantly the meatball fans would declare WHITE FLAG 2, and this franchise would be dead for a decade. This is where Balta says, but this franchise HAS BEEN DEAD for nearly a decade. Even if it's 1984-1987 bad, and that's actually next to impossible with the stadium lease agreement with the state, the overall profitability of the team will still continue to climb quite nicely whether attendance was/is 800,000 or 1,800,000. As it stands right now, we saw one of the ten highest percentage-wise season ticket growth rates this offseason and we're still 27th in attendance. How can we go much lower? We will pass Miami, Tampa Bay and Cleveland? -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:41 AM) Well fWAR is better because it tells what should have happened rather than what actually happened. And that's where you will find a bunch of experts who will say, "who cares what SHOULD have happened...because it didn't." We have an equal duty to explain reality...because it's nearly impossible to use defensive ratings to project accurately what SHOULD happen any more than an algorithm can predict an event like 9/11 or the credit default swaps throwing the stock market completely out of whack. It's getting better and better, but it's not like it's the be all, end all when it comes to assessment. Living in that hypothetical universe, the 1994 White Sox SHOULD have won the World Series, and advanced to the playoffs in 2003, 2006, 2010 and 2012. It's why adding up the WAR of individual players doesn't usually come close to telling you which teams are the best, or will perform the best in the post-season. It's just one snapshot. It did, on the other hand, inform us quite early that the off-season changes made weren't going to make this team a playoff contender. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:39 AM) Hooray for appeasing the fan base! Yay, a net increase of 1,750 per game that will all be erased this coming off-season anyway. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:31 AM) Please tell me who are studs. This team needs moar Jackie Bradley How come everytime I crack a joke when you make s*** up, you defer to "OMG MAYBE THE MODS SHOULD TELL US WHAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT BECAUSE THEY ARE THE EXPERTS"? lol If you comb through pages and pages of "draft talk," it seems a lot of stuff was just conjecture, was it not? By definition, if people weren't making stuff up or theorizing or hypothesizing, then they possessed inside information. And sure, Lorenzo Cain 2-3 seasons ago didn't look all that different from Jackie Bradley, Jr. today, depending on which scout you talked to. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:30 AM) Please, Abreu carries plenty of value Caulfield and you know this. It's easy to say trade Sale or Q but what are their values? Of course, he has plenty of value. But "our" version of plenty might not be another team's. At the end of 2014, his value was certainly higher than it is now...same with Eaton, Quintana, Samardzija and Abreu. The question is how much the White Sox are willing to "discount" from that established offseason rate. If it's 50 cents on the dollar, that's not going to help much for the future...it will just end up causing rebuilding to take that much longer. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:25 AM) Check fangraphs. Then pop off. Also, 1.8 vs. 1.0 isn't one full point. So obviously there's a huge statistical formula differentiation from dWAR, fWAR and whatever ESPN is using. Tell me in your own words why Fangraphs has a better number....something besides, "but it's from Fangraphs so it must be right." Because obviously if one system or another's proven to be BETTER and more accurate, then everyone would have a vested interested in adopting or improving it. It has already happened with fielding ratings going from UZR to Range Factor to Net Fielding Wins to Defensive Runs Saved in the span of less than 5 years. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:20 AM) Maybe we shouldnt pull everything out of our asses in order to comment and consider ourselves erudited? Then you tell me....who are the experts at this site that have insight into EXACTLY which players other teams are making available in a potential Chris Sale or Jose Quintana trade? By definition, nobody in here works for a professional baseball team, so, everything here is going to be 100% speculation (or intentional leaking) and primarily "researched" by going through "collection" sites like mlbtraderumors. When guys like Jayson Stark, Gammons, Ken Rosenthal, Phil Rogers or Keith Law write, they're way off at least 50-75% of the time. That's probably still more successful than the local Chicago media. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:21 AM) No I didn't. We all know Josh Phegley can't keep this up. And the great Marcus Semien is fading fast while still "holding his own" at SS with only 22 errors. http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/batting/_/pos.../qualified/true You're only off by one full point in your WAR numbers on Betts. Not a big deal. Statistics. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:12 AM) Betts is a 1.0 WAR player right now. So is Josh Phegley. Bogaerts is a 1.4, 7th in baseball for SS and he is 22. You just made the case we've already made a terrible trade for Jeff Samardzija...and it will only get worse in the coming years. At any rate, Boston isn't going to trade either Betts or Bogaerts. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 08:04 AM) I love when you browse team prospect rankings and start talking about teams. lmao Because I'm sure you know every single team's top 30 prospects and have watched all their videos, lmao. Probably you're going to be following in the footsteps of Kevin Goldstein and Keith Law with your erudition. Maybe we should just have the moderating team and the minor league "reporters" be the only ones at the site "eligible" to make comments on any player. That would be a lot more fun for us to just sit back and learn from the experts. -
Could the Sox get proper value in trading Sale?
caulfield12 replied to Real's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dunt @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 07:53 AM) Ya that .237/.296/.381 line is truly elite....so stud, much wow. I'm talking about his defense, mostly. His offense has been erratic, sure. Look at the WAR ratings. He'll start to jump out soon enough. http://espn.go.com/mlb/war/leaders/_/type/...nsive/year/2015 He's Top 20 in the majors defensively among all players. Teams are going to pay J. Heyward $100+ million for less offense and a corner instead of CF spot. Same with Alex Gordon. Betts is going to be a very valuable player for them going forward. Not to mention his pittance of a salary compared to Heyward/Gordon, etc. If we're going to laugh or scoff at CFers who put up an OPS around 700 while playing close to elite defense, we might as well give up trying to compete in the new era of baseball because we're going to continue to be terrible offensively AND defensively....at the very worst, if you're not going to score, you should have elite defense and pitching (both starting and relieving) in order to field a competitive team. -
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 06:01 AM) And they are more talented at every position in the field except for RF & LF, and the Sox LF is extremely underachieving. Even then, I'm sure 75-80% of scouts would pick Soler over Garcia straight-up. It would be an interesting discussion at least. Both have quite a few flaws, but still possess big-time raw potential as well.
-
QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jun 15, 2015 -> 06:57 AM) Not to mention that nearly all their moves this past offseason have worked out while nearly all of ours have blown up in our face. I still don't understand how Hammel is doing so well for them, he got pounded in Oakland last year. The same reason the majority of NL players that came to the White Sox have been disappointments...
