-
Posts
38,974 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
205
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Chicago White Sox
-
The holes of the system:shortstop and catcher
Chicago White Sox replied to Dominikk85's topic in FutureSox Board
I think the catcher spot is in pretty decent shape. I think people are overreacting to Collins' poor batting average. I'm going to wait and see where he is this time next year before I panic. He may have to work on correcting that hitch, but I do think that is fixable whereas a lack of plate discipline would much more difficult to fix. After Collins, you got interesting guys in Zavala, Skoug, Perez, & Alfaro amongst a few others. SS is definitely a concern area. Yrizarri has some potential, but also some big red flags. Curbelo & Nunez are both exciting prospects, but haven't even hit full season ball and may not even stick. My hope is we can somehow land an elite SS prospect in next year's draft like Bryce Turang. I'm not giving up on Anderson yet, but we really do need a backup plan for him. -
QUOTE (GermanSock @ Jul 20, 2017 -> 06:36 AM) I think not eating more of robertsons salary (than taking clippard) is the only thing that you could the sox blame for. If they ate more they could have gotten a top100 for him alone and maybe another one for kahnle later but is that better than one top30? I would have like a better second piece than clarkin but the ownership probably wasn't willing to pay more. Hahn said they offered to eat money with other teams, but this was the best deal from a value standpoint. Unfortunatly, they can't force the Yankees to give up a better prospect return in exchange for money.
-
7/19 Game Thread: Dodgers @ Sox
Chicago White Sox replied to Chicago White Sox's topic in 2017 Season in Review
Lol @ the epic fail in the match game with two cards left! -
7/19 Game Thread: Dodgers @ Sox
Chicago White Sox replied to Chicago White Sox's topic in 2017 Season in Review
Renteria is a f***ing joke. -
QUOTE (Username @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 01:56 PM) Looks like Rutherford will go to A ball. Seriously where are they going to put everyone? Outside of a Jimenez promotion to AA (or Fisher in a quick move) I can't imagine who's going to go up to make room. Have to imagine Micker might be promoted soon? Once A+ clears up a bit. I'd keep Adolfo in low A all year. He still has to work on his plate discipline and Winston-Salem is already loaded with OF talent.
-
I'll be in attendance tonight! Should be an awesome game!
-
QUOTE (JUSTgottaBELIEVE @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 02:50 PM) I hear you but pretty sad when you consider that every one of those players was on a "team friendly" contract. It was still a very strong collection of talent as evidenced by these trades, just a shame they couldn't find even average MLB starters to field the rest of the team. So many free agent busts in recent years. I totally agree, it makes me sick to my stomach that we couldn't build around a core of Sale, Quintana, Rodon, Eaton, Abrue, etc. But the reality was the system was barren and we were at a pivot point. Our rebuilding effort is off to a great start simply because we cashed in our core assets before they lost all value.
-
Future Lineup and rotation idea's
Chicago White Sox replied to whitesoxwinner's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (StrykerSox @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 11:19 AM) I'm with you on this. Don't think they'll contend, but I'm confused how some people think we'll have a super high draft pick in 2019. Probably 10-15, I'd guess. Because we'll have a lineup full of question marks, two massive holes in our rotation, a non-existent bullpen, and several key contributors that will be in their first full season & likely to struggle. Unless the Sox go out and sign some quality free agents, I full expect a bottom five performance next year. 2019 should be much better when that next wave of talent hits and the first group has worked through their growing pains. -
QUOTE (JUSTgottaBELIEVE @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 01:49 PM) The funny thing is, depending upon how you define superstar, the White Sox kind of already had that prior to this season between Eaton, Abreu, Sale, Q and now Avi this year. I'm not saying at this point I disagree with the rebuild approach but just find it ironic that the best case scenario for this rebuild is to find a new group of core players (which is a risk when referring to prospects) when we had already established this type of core group locked up for multiple seasons yet still couldn't manage to win more than 78 games. The key difference though is despite having those superstars previously, we did not have the depth or payroll capacity we're projected to now to fill in around them. We literally had no one in AAA that we could call up and expect to be 1 to 2 WAR player right away. That's the main reason we had to rebuild.
-
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 11:58 AM) You have concerns about Avi's weight, but not Abreu's? I want Abreu to be our full-time DH, so yeah, I'm more concerned with Avi because he has to play the field. And why it might not be the reason, Avi suddenly becoming a productive hitter after losing 18 pounds gives me concern that his playing weight has a direct impact on his offensive ability. Perhaps I should have a similar concern about Abreu, but he also has a pretty good track record with his hitting.
-
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 01:13 PM) I don't view Rutherford as a potential superstar, but I agree with basically everything else here. Well done. And that's totally fair. I have my own concerns with Rutherford, but it seems like the Sox believe he can be that kind of player. And assuming that's the case, I can understand why they made this deal. But to your point Shack, there's definitely a chance they left some value on the table. It does seem like some posters are really sleeping on the value Kahnle could have a year from.
-
QUOTE (heirdog @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 12:01 PM) I suppose any return can be debated but one constant theme I've noticed is any critic of the deals Hahn has made to this point say "one player short" or "a tick light on the back end." Sale trade: "should've included Devers instead of Basabe & Diaz" Eaton trade: "great but should've pried Robles instead of Giolito" Quintana trade: "back end should've been better with Candelario" Fraz/DRob/Kahnle trade: "Clarkin should've been 3rd piece w Andujar or Florial" Given that we have basically been shopping most of these guys for over a year, Rick and team have a pretty good idea of the true market and what the best offers available. Given that Rick has shown patience, even with some impatience on this board, it's fairly clear that he didn't just jump on any offer to dump these guys. Given that there are still about 2 weeks left until the deadline, Rick's hand wasn't forced and ultimately these met the threshold of the type of return they could expect. I'm extremely happy with these trades both individually and overall. I believe that the Sox did ample due diligence and extracted the appropriate returns that are realistic. I want the Sox to seek potential superstars and the more high end chips the more likely we hit on a few. Our system has plenty of B/C prospects that will likely be okay or surprise. Give me the blue chippers all day every day and I'll sacrifice the back end of deals. I'm not sure anyone really complained about the Eaton trade, but otherwise the "one player short" comments are frequent. And quite frankly, I think they reflect exactly what Hahn is trying to accomplish with these trades and that's grabbing the best potential impact talents possible. The hardest thing to find is stars and with greater restrictions on the draft & international free agency it's got even harder for rebuilding clubs. Basically, you have to get super lucky or spend big in free agency if you don't have great draft position or valuable that can be cashed in to kick off a rebuild. We had three super valuable trade chips coming into this rebuild. For those three assets, we landed two blue chip positional prospects & five quality pitching prospects along with some filler (sorry Basabe). We were also able to use some of our payroll savings to add another potential positional star in Robert. That's a great start, especially on the pitching side, but obviously we needed more star upside on the positional side. IMO, even though I feel the trade is a player light when viewed in isolation, getting another potential blue chipper in Rutherford is HUGE for the overall process. We all have to remember this is a numbers game. As much as I wish we could, we simply can't assume all these guys work out. Let's say we have four potential positional stars in Moncada, Jimenez, Robert, & Rutherford. If two of those guys become full-fledged superstars, one becomes an above-average everyday player, and the fourth guy completely flops, that's a huge win for us. We have enough organizational depth and payroll capacity to fill in holes with good/solid players. The important thing is finding two or three superstars for the lineup and another two or three in the rotation. Getting Rutherford puts us in a much better spot to achieve that goal. And while a much lesser consideration, losing Robertson & Kahnle puts us in a better position to land a future superstar in the 2018 draft. So again, while I think this trade is a little light on its own merits, I think it was worth making when considering the whole process. I just think it's hard to pass on a potential superstar today, because you might get a better prospect with a higher ceiling down the road. I just don't think the reward is worth the risk, especially if you believe that Rutherford can be a blue chipper by next season.
-
Unless someone gives up nice value for Abreu (which would be unlikely in this market), I have no problem keeping him and possibly even extending him. Not sure what the financials would look like, but I kind of like the idea of him as our DH and anchoring our lineup for the next four years or so with all the youngsters expected to come up.
-
QUOTE (maxjusttyped @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 01:45 AM) 1. Yoan Moncada 2. Eloy Jimenez 3. Michael Kopech 4. Luis Robert 5. Blake Rutherford 6. Zack Collins 7. Alec Hansen 8. Reynaldo Lopez 9. Dane Dunning 10. Jake Burger 11. Lucas Giolito 12. Dylan Cease 13. Jordan Guerrero 14. Micker Adolfo 15. Carson Fulmer 16. Gavin Sheets 17. Ian Clarkin 18. Evan Skoug 19. Luis Gonzalez 20. Danny Mendick No Spencer Adams love?
-
01. Moncada, 2B 02. Jimenez, OF 03. Kopech, SP 04. Robert, OF 05. Lopez, SP 06. Rutherford, OF 07. Giolito, SP 08. Hansen, SP 09. Collins, C 10. Dunning, SP 11. Cease, SP 12. Burger, 3B 13. Adolfo, OF 14. Adams, SP 15. Fulmer, SP 16. Stephens, SP 17. Burdi, SP 18. Delmonico, OF/3B 19. Guerrero, SP 20. Fisher, OF 21. Sheets, 1B 22. Basabe, OF 23. Flores, SP 24. Clarkin, SP 25. Call, OF 26. Curbelo, SS 27. Zavala, C 28. Skoug, C/1B 29. Nunez, SS/3B 30. Yrizarri, SS
-
QUOTE (Tony @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 10:52 AM) In two years, the Sox have about 8 million dollars committed to the payroll. IF Avi continues to produce these sort of numbers, given the amount of time they have invested in him, his clubhouse attitude, etc...I see no problem with an extension. But at what price? IMO, you'd have to get a nice discount to even consider it. No reason to pay him close to market when we can always sign a free agent down the road if we can't fill the spot internally in a few years. Honestly, I just don't feel comfortable of committing to Avi unless it's very favorable circumstances. He just seems like a guy who could gain some weight as he ages and all of sudden his game falls apart.
-
Anthony Swarzak to Brewers; Sox receive Ryan Cordell
Chicago White Sox replied to username's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 10:39 AM) Starting to think that unless Avi + can bring back a top 100 prospect then go ahead and wait until the off season to re-evaluate. If Avi continues to hit his stock will be up this winter and Hahn can dangle him at the winter meeting to see what kind of offers he gets. Or,Moncada/Abreu/Avi could give us a glimpse of what the future could be like and may want to keep Avi around. Ha, never thought I'd say that. Still skeptical of Avi so I'm hoping the Cards get desperate and make Hahn an offer he can't refuse. The Marlins could have a couple elite OFs on the market this winter plus there are a couple good free agents. Might not be the best time to dangle Avi. -
Future Lineup and rotation idea's
Chicago White Sox replied to whitesoxwinner's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Yeah, right now our projected up-the-middle is: 2B: Moncada SS: Anderson CF: Robert C: Collins That's a pretty good starting point. And most likely, we'll have a top 3 to 5 pick in the next two drafts to add another up the middle player or two. While the names can change between now and the draft, a guy like Brice Turang would be a huge get and provide us with an incredibly high end SS prospect. -
Anthony Swarzak to Brewers; Sox receive Ryan Cordell
Chicago White Sox replied to username's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 07:14 AM) Maybe an arm from the Red Sox system would be nice. Honestly, I'll take anything with upside, but the two areas I'd try avoiding are A ball OFs and starters in AA/AAA. We have huge logjams in those areas, but an A ball arm would make plenty of sense for us. -
QUOTE (beautox @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 12:38 AM) Suck for Singer?? Tank for Turang!
-
QUOTE (Username @ Jul 19, 2017 -> 06:37 AM) Anyone know if there's smoke to Avi being available, or is Nightengale just speculating? I guess to an extent our OF prospects are pretty loaded now, so would make sense. Though I'll be really sad if Avi is gone as well haha. If you can get value for him, then why not? Helps the tanking effort and creates room for one of Leury, Engel, Willy, & Delmonico to get everyday playing time. Again, got to get value though.
-
Anthony Swarzak to Brewers; Sox receive Ryan Cordell
Chicago White Sox replied to username's topic in Pale Hose Talk
He's definitely getting moved, but it's going to be a for low level talent. Wouldn't mind adding another middle infielder for Kannapolis or Winston Salem.
