Everything posted by Flash Tizzle
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
Terrible from Pierzynski.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
Beckham has no balance with his swing.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 07:59 PM) I'm so drunk right now I no longer care about the ineptness of this team. But good god damn there's this hot piece of Latin ass I been scopin since I been here. Almost time to make my move. What's with the angry black man avatar?
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
LOL, Humber braced himself on that 1-1 pitch as if he thought it was going to get killed.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
That 1-0 swing from Beckham was embarrassing. He just looks bad out there. Another quick and terrible inning from the offense.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
This scene is almost written for a triple play to occur.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 07:06 PM) If people can't take a 10-17 start, there is no way they will be able to stand years of no chance when the season begins, and there is zero guarantee if the White Sox organization focused their resources entirely on the draft and development, that they would be successful. In fact, the odds would be against them. Then they'll just have to continue losing until they figure it out.
-
What's a worse scenario?
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 06:51 PM) If the Sox cannot select the correct players who have track records, how are they going to build from within through drafting unknowns? Who have they drafted have they basically stolen? Who have they developed? They do not have the personnel in management to get this done. I agree with SS2K5 here, although 20 may be a little high. What makes them Tampa Bay (who were bad a real long time) vs. Pittsburgh or KC who have been bad even longer? They go to a real low payroll, unless their recognizing talent in the draft and developmental program improves dramatically overnight, it will be closer to 20 years than the 3 or 4 most who choose this way figure it will take. It's not the idea of just building from within, because they'll never do that alone. But we will NEVER learn the value of developing a system unless we're forced into it. If knocking down the team, having 5-6 years of putrid baseball forces them to fix their faults I'll accept it. Because when it begins to turn around and this team begins competing, the payroll will increase but we will also have the benefit of a quality system to offset the salaries of more expensive players.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 06:50 PM) Agree 100% with you. This team just goes out on the field trying to find new ways to lose it seems. I know I'm a critical bastard, but yesterday when I said how we suck in every aspect of the game, even the optimistic posters couldn't think of something we're good at. I just hope KW and Ozzie and Buddy Bell are shown the door, along with Walker. People will reply that if we undergo a rebuilding effort the crowds will go away and our payroll will sink. Yes, that's true -- but also, at the point when we're fielding a good team, with a whole new set of names, they will return. If there's any one thing you can say, without question, that has been absent this last decade it's a contributing minor league system. Having a 90 loss team shouldn't be the push needed to address this issue, but they'll never learn otherwise.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
Maybe it still would have been a WP, but AJ did a piss poor job of positioning himself there.
-
Sox Game on WGN Saturday 4/30
QUOTE (zenryan @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 06:23 PM) Tillman is throwing puss. No kidding. He's throwing some meat up there. But it doesn't matter with this team.
-
Chat crew 2011
QUOTE (qwerty @ Apr 28, 2011 -> 06:22 PM) The soxtalk savior kalapse is waiting for all of his disciples to follow. Come on in he says. Well he would say it here... but he is too shy. http://www.soxtalk.com/chat/chatroom.html Let's do this.
-
What's a worse scenario?
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 30, 2011 -> 05:23 PM) The meltdown scenario will set this franchise back 20 years. No, it wont. Thankfully that's all the insight necessary for your post, because this 20 year number was obviously an arbitrary figure of how YOU feel. Yes, we all realize you don't want to grow old and watch the Sox struggle; I've picked up that vibe for years. But admit that rather than provide a doomsday scenario of what may happen if they decide to take another direction with this team. Listen, there's no set way of winning a championship, but what they're doing right now isn't working. It may be time to try another approach rather than wait for a .700+ winning streak to set us right and give everyone false hope. Deal with it with some dignity, please.
-
4/20 GAME THREAD: Sox @ Rays, 5:40pm CT
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 07:08 PM) Humber hangs far too many pitches up in the zone. We're always looking to bring back past players. It looks like Lance Broadway found his way back to our team.
-
4/20 GAME THREAD: Sox @ Rays, 5:40pm CT
LOL this team looks atrocious. "Took a bad hop," yeah Hawk, but maybe if Alexi didn't let the ball play him it wouldn't have happened.
-
White Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels 4/15, 7:10 PM CT. CSN
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 15, 2011 -> 08:19 PM) Awesome...defense costs us 2 more runs. Humber was just cruising for a bruising all game, as his command and stuff were awful. Good thing we played for one run in the bottom of the inning. If you were to view Lance Broadway pitching next to Humber you'd think they were the same pitcher. From their delivery to their underwhelming stuff, it sickens me to watch.
-
Chat crew 2011
Hey everyone, Kalapse is in chat! Let us all see what he has to say! And remember, this is how you get in -- click the link, hit run, and then click NO. You should be allowed in.
-
Chat crew 2011
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Apr 1, 2011 -> 05:00 PM) Can't get in due to security parameters. Click yes that you want to run the application, and then when the next screen pops up click no. You'll be in. And for the rest of you, get in there now while there's still time in this game.
-
2011 Films Thread
Has anyone seen Insidious? I've been hearing positive reviews from several of my friends.
-
U.S. launches airstrikes on Libya
It better get interesting, quickly. I'm growing bored watching these people angrily shake their shoes in the air. And please, save me the self righteous attitude of acting like you all don't deep down agree with me.
-
Snowmageddon 2011
Real jobs don't take snow days. I'll be on the road early tomorrow before my 7am start. See you all out there!
-
Catch All Anything Thread
I purchased an Android phone (Huawei Ascend) through Cricket several weeks ago, pay $60 dollars a month for unlimited texts/phone calls/internet service, and have to say it has been an outstanding choice thus far. Neither the phone nor the service get much respect with Iphone and others overshadowing them, but I have to say I've been satisfied.
-
2010 Fall TV Thread
On Halloween I recorded a five part series on IFC called "The Dead Set" (read the review on Bloody Disgusting, it was posted recently). I'm only through the first episode, but it's definitely in the 28 Days Later mode of running zombies and shaky cinematography. I wouldn't know where someone would pick it up, but it's atleast something to keep you occupied between Walking Dead episodes.
-
LET'S MAKE A LIST - OCTOBER '10
25. American Werewolf in London 24. Hatchet 23. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1976) 22. Halloween 3: Season of the Witch 21. Wolfen 20. Halloween 6: Curse of Michael Myers 19. The Ninth Gate 18. The Exorcist 17. Nightmare on Elm Street 16. Dellamorte Dellamore 15. In the Mouth of Madness 14. Pet Sematary 13. Demons 12. Dead Alive 11. 28 Days Later 10. Prince of Darkness 9. Evil Dead II 8. IT 7. Jacobs Ladder 6. Session 9 5. From Dusk Till Dawn 4. Return of the Living Dead 3. Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors 2. Suspiria 1. Candyman Perfection.
-
LET'S MAKE A LIST - OCTOBER '10
Nice, I didn't expect Jacob's Ladder to be on there. It was my #7 movie. IMO, the movies high up on the list are the most interesting for me (even if it only takes 3/4 votes to earn a spot) because you figure the top 10 will include mostly well known titles. The horror films around here are the type of genre specific movies which appeal to some, but not most.