Bob Sacamano

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 17, 2016 -> 07:06 AM) just realized how almost all these guys were on tigers. Had their owner paid out like crazy imagine they had a rotation of Verlander Scherzer Porcello Price Fuller A $120 million rotation That'd almost be $30 mill each for the first 4 since Fulmer would be league minimum. That'd be an insane rotation.

QUOTE (CWSpalehoseCWS @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 08:54 PM) Sox prospects in danger of being lost per MLB.com: Chicago White Sox (6) 6. Adam Engel, OF 10. Jordan Guerrero, LHP 12. Jacob May, OF 14. Courtney Hawkins, OF 25. Luis Martinez, RHP 27. Nick Delmonico, 1B/OF Sox have the 40-Man set at 38, so you have to figure two of those guys will be added before Friday. I don't have the 40 man in front of me, but are there any good candidates to dfa?

QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 04:13 PM) There is going to be a melt down no matter what happens. Let's be real. Tousché.

Can you guys imagine the meltdown that will happen here if Sale isn't traded this offseason or if someone like Gray or Archer are dealt for a haul?

Think it's fair to say "(insert team name here) could have/has/is a fit for Sale."

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 03:34 PM) The fact that I like it so much tells me LAD would probably say no. Lol yeah...more than likely. I've pointed out a few times though that they get basically 3 first round picks in next year's draft if Turner and Jansen sign elsewhere, along with a possible draft pick for Frazier in 2018. Maybe they can look at it that way and figure they can recoup some big losses in a trade now? Edit: also just really bored at work lol

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 03:31 PM) Nah, I would've posted it too. I just don't think the words "rumor" or "reported" should be in the title because they got me excited for mere speculation. Me too lol I came back from a lunch outing with co-workers and I almost spit out my water lol

QUOTE (heirdog @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 03:13 PM) The quote just seems to lump the Sox as "speculative fits based on need." While it's true that catcher is a need, doesn't mean that they have actually shown any interest. This. It seems like a lot of people can't tell the difference.

Who says no? White Sox get: Urias, Bellinger, Verdugo, Lux, Buehler, Barnes and Puig (as a throw in) Dodgers get: Sale, Frazier, and Robertson Lot of moving parts, but would be big for both teams.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 02:42 PM) Chris Cotillo ‏@ChrisCotillo 2h2 hours ago 12/1 CBA expiration date wreaking havoc on FA process. Teams/agents not sure of luxury tax threshold. One agent: "Should've expired 11/1". Agreed! Very stupid to have it expire a month into the off-season.

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 01:54 PM) Is this Birenbaum guy credible? I've never heard of him before. Hes a writer but hes not reporting on anything. Just saying what he'd want.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 01:46 PM) Edited. Thanks.

Jesus this thread title is misleading

I don't understand the "if we blow this deal, it screws the club for decade(s)." If he leaves in 3 years via free agency, we aren't screwed?

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Nov 16, 2016 -> 08:21 AM) Can someone sum up what he said when he's done? I can't listen to it right now. I'm assuming its info we already know.

QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 05:49 PM) Why no way? My bad I thought there was an amd between Benintendi and Moncada. Still don't see it happening. I see it being one of Benintendi and Bradley, and then one of Moncada and Devers, and then 3 other guys.

QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 05:28 PM) Callis talking about a package from Boston of JBJ, Moncada or Benintendi, Devers and Kopech. No way that deal happens. I was listening live to this and shook my head.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 04:43 PM) Houston will probably look to give away their 1b/DH who struggled mightily (Tyler White), just like the Rangers with Gallo. Tucker, the first round draft pick with some similarities to Ryan Sweeney but more power potential, is another name. Plus they do have a logjam with Bregman, Gurriel, Altuve and Correa, unless one of the first two go to LF/DH/1b (losing some surplus positional calue.) Plus, they already have Gattis. There's also the Pirates, Rangers and Cardinals to consider. Still believe the Dodgers want to send Puig packing in any major trade. They also added Aoki already who's number look good last year. Added him to help off-set all the K's in the lineup.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 04:39 PM) The Wild card for Houston is Yulieski Gurriel. Both he and Bregmann play 3b. It makes no sense for the White Sox to go after him since he's 32, but they have to figure out where he's playing next year. They have a young 1b who might be sliding in, which would move Gurriel to corner OF perhaps, which makes for an odd setup when you've just signed a Cuban 3b. They have a few young 1B. Gattis also in DH spot.

QUOTE (steveno89 @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 04:17 PM) It would take more than Bregman to get a deal done Bregman, Tucker and Musgrove/Martes/Whitley/Paulino plus one more B+ prospect starts to get close to an acceptable return for the White Sox Well yeah...they suggested Bregman and then like 4 others.

QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 03:37 PM) Feels like less talk about Houston as a potential partner than I would think. They'd seem to be a type of team looking to make a big splash and get to the next level - especially with an affordable contract like Sale (maybe worth more to Houston than a Dodgers type with inifinite $) Matt Spiegel on the Score was talking about how he loves them as a destination for Sale. They need a front of the rotation arm to go along with the great youth around the rest of the field. Him and Jim Callis were saying Bregman could be expendable since Correa and Altuve are up the middle and Gurriel is at third. Would love to get Bregman.

QUOTE (bruni @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 12:11 PM) Why do posters keep talking about the Dodgers reluctance to include Urias in a package for Sale when even since July it was reported that Urias was dangled as part of a return for Sale? For Sale alone the deal must include Urias plus 2 top 50 prospects and at least one more top 100 guy. Throw Frazier into the mix would likely require another top 100 guy and 2 lottery picks. This is why - to me anyway - the Dodgers should have the ammo to pull off the deal. Agreed. And, depending on what else the Dodgers do this offseason, they will have 3 picks in the first 35 or so. And if they don't resign Frazier, they can get a draft pick for him in the 2018 draft. They can restock their farm a bit. They also have the ability to lock up Sale beyond his current deal.

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 11:36 AM) Well said, good friend. I've already come to grips with seeing Sale in a different uniform. It is what it is. All I hope is the Sox improve from this process. Exactly. Sucks it's come to this since he's so great but it is what it is.

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 10:54 AM) You don't have to though. He has 4 years of control. Can be moved at deadline. Or next offseason. Or the one after. This is the point I've been hammering lol everyone is trying to rush everyone out of here. A full rebuild can take 3-4 years (maybe even more). Guys can be held onto and dealt if you don't feel like a deal is what you want right now. Realistically, I see one of Sale/Quintana, Abreu, Jones and likely Eaton here for at least until June. I don't see many teams willing to give up their top talent. I'd love to be proven wrong and see most of those guys dealt for huge hauls but I'm taking a realistic approach. Melky, Frazier, Robertson and one Sale/Q I see dealt.

QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Nov 15, 2016 -> 10:50 AM) You move Q as well if a team offers a big haul. Sale and Q have the most value Fixed.