Everything posted by ChiSoxFanMike
-
Red Sox sign David Price for 217 million over 7 years
The only way I could see a guy like Sale or Q being traded is if it was a 3 team deal. Let's be real here. No matter how good and cheap they both are, no team is going to empty their farm for either one of them.
-
David Price $217mm/7 years
Although it's probably not likely, I could see a team getting desperate and overpaying for Sale or Q.
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
QUOTE (LDF @ Dec 1, 2015 -> 04:41 PM) maybe you are right, but he did take a huge discount to sign an extension with the sox. sooooo who knows. Unless the Sox start winning consistently and he loves it here, I think there's less than a 1% chance that he signs another super team friendly deal. But like you said, who really knows until it happens?
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 1, 2015 -> 04:32 PM) Chris Sale on the open market in 4 years will easily top that deal. Unfortunately no way in hell it comes from us. Agreed. I would've loved to see him be a White Sox lifer, but that certainly won't happen now. The inflated contracts that these pitching free agents are getting is unreal and the Sox won't pony up the dough it'll take to keep him from going elsewhere. It'll be a very sad day when Chris Sale is in a uniform other than a White Sox one.
-
David Price $217mm/7 years
100% agree. I'd keep Rodon, Fulmer, and Johnson for the foreseeable future too. Sale/Q/Rodon/Fulmer/Johnson is DEFINITELY a more than formidable starting rotation for the next 3-4 years. Like you said, they have the pitching. They need to build around it.
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
Nothing would've made me happier then to see him go to the Cubs. Then they'd be stuck with 2 overpaid aging pitchers that would severely hamper their payroll flexibility when their young studs get older and more expensive. Oh well...
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
This deal just reaffirms what I already knew. If Chris Sale was on the market this year, there isn't a chance that he'd get less than $250 million.
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
Damn, I wanted him to go to the Cubs.
-
Article on Hanley Ramirez
QUOTE (raBBit @ Dec 1, 2015 -> 03:43 PM) I'd rather they take Melky and give us money. Hanley is basically Melky with a way better bat and a bad attitude. Who would replace Melky in the outfield? I'm not opposed to your idea, I'm just not sure who would replace him unless the Sox signed a big name guy like Upton, Cespedes, etc.
-
Article on Hanley Ramirez
If the Red Sox eat at least half of his contract AND take LaRoche, I'd take him.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 1, 2015 -> 09:50 AM) I hear ya and agree. I can live with Saladino/Sanchez up the middle for one season to see if their bats come around but my preference would be to get a SS, play Sanchez at 2B and use Saladino as the utility/platoon type. Problem with that is short stops are about as hard to come by as third baseman. One idea could be to sign Freese to play 3B, trade for Lawrie to play 2B, start Saladino at SS and use Sanchez as the utility. I still prefer Saladino as the utility due to his defensive versatility. The have their work cut out for them this off season. If this happened, I'd like to see Sanchez and Saladino flip flop their roles on the team. I don't know how good of a shortstop Sanchez would be at the MLB level, but he's younger than Saladino and has more upside IMO.
-
Jae-gyun Hwang
QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 08:33 PM) Unfortunately his stats are nothing special in Korea: http://www.baseball-reference.com/register...amp;id=dffe1d5e Eric freaking Thames hit just about .400 with 47 homers. Those stats right there tell you everything you need to know about the Korean Leagues.
-
Shelby Miller
QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 05:13 PM) Too many offensive holes to fill to waste resources on more pitching. The Sox need to remain focused on acquiring young hitting talent. Just a friendly reminder that the Sox were 28th in runs scored last season. This is all that really needs to be said. Would Miller be a great pickup if the Sox had an offense like the Blue Jays do? Yes, but they don't, so the Sox need to save all their trade assets for hitting.
-
Shelby Miller
The Sox need a young impact hitter much more than they need a young impact pitcher. I don't want him unless the Sox can steal him away.
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
QUOTE (shipps @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 12:06 PM) Weren't the Tigers supposed to be trying to unload some salary this year? I was surprised to see them as the first to start throwing money around again. Their "window" of contending is closing fast. Their owners probably figure that they have to spend now to win now, since they obviously won't be winning in the future.
-
White Sox still deciding on what to do
QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 11:31 AM) It's that easy, isn't it? You just decide you want a guy traded and one of the other 29 teams magically agrees to a trade. LMAO. I was thinking the same thing but I didn't want to come off as rude.
-
Ten Year Members
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 11:12 AM) I have some similar thoughts to this one, however, I think part of the reason we all feel this way is because of how poor a product the Sox have put on the field. It has been truly pitiful and awful to watch. Very few guys are exciting, our defense is terrible. Basically the entire brand of White Sox baseball has stunk for people who enjoy the game and thus it has became extremely pitiful to watch. As I say more now than I did when I was younger, sports are entertainment, you need to be entertained and nothing about the recent Sox stretch has been entertaining (outside of last off-season). They have consistently came out of the gates slow and as a result, have generally been out of contention for the vast majority of the long baseball seasons. Contrast that to say the Royals brand of baseball, where you know if you watch on any given night, you are probably going to see some stellar defensive plays and baserunning for that matter (stolen bases, imo, are exciting, especially when it happens in close games). Baseball does need to speed its pace of play up. Manfred seems to get that so I'm optimistic of where they will take it. Agreed. If the Sox were as exciting now as they were in 2005, all these people that say it's boring would certainly watch more of it.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 09:19 AM) I really don't think either should be moved honestly. If the Sox don't upgrade that position then you need a fall back plan. Micah has the chance for better offense and Sanchez is the better defender. If the Sox say go with Sanchez next year and he can't hit worth a lick then you have Micah to back him up. Sox can't afford to keep thinning the middle infield anymore . In my theory, Lawrie would replace whoever is traded. But I get your point.
-
2015 MLB Offseason activity thread
Any AL team that gives Cueto a 6 year/$120 million or more deal is crazy. He's way past his prime, especially if he stays in the AL. Maybe he'd be worth that contract to an NL team, but he was basically like Samardzija in the AL.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (LDF @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 08:44 AM) i agree, i would move johnson b/c sanchez defense is already has be spotlighted, I think Micah's bat is much better, but then again, his defense is terrible. Sanchez is already an elite defender, but only has an average bat. I think with more experience though, he can become a serviceable hitter.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
If one of Johnson/Sanchez were moved, I can't decide who I'd rather see traded. Both have pros and cons. I'd probably lean towards keeping Sanchez and trading Johnson if push came to shove, but I really don't know.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 07:23 AM) What does this even mean? Its not like the sox are a disruptive bad clubhouse I was referring to poor decision-making that Sox players usually have on the field (terrible baserunning, low baseball IQ, etc)
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 07:09 AM) Lawrie has a history of negativity and poor decision-making: http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/5/16/3...jays-throws-bat http://nesn.com/2013/05/brett-lawries-dele...al-follow-up-2/ http://www.torontosun.com/2013/05/27/blue-...tude-adjustment http://www.royalsreview.com/2015/4/20/8455...ace-to-baseball http://tinyurl.com/oa8dfy7 http://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/...p;sub=102125185 If this is truly the case, then he'd fit in with the Sox just fine.
-
why not go for Brett lawrie?
QUOTE (Dunt @ Nov 30, 2015 -> 01:15 AM) Trading for Lawrie and signing Hwang would give some nice infield options too. Can have Lawrie slide to 2B. What would happen to Sanchez and Micah Johnson in this scenario? Would they be traded?
-
Rule 5 Draft
The great Balbino! I want the Sox to pick him up just so I can call him that on a regular basis.