March 11Mar 11 Author 1 hour ago, Quin said: Oof. Yeah, this goes back to the good faith. This really bad. There is "legal" and this is pissing down the legs of your peers.
March 11Mar 11 7 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: Yeah, this goes back to the good faith. This really bad. There is "legal" and this is pissing down the legs of your peers. Yep. It would be interesting to see what kind of damage control is going on behind the scenes. Regardless of the reason, not a good look to the rest of the league.
March 11Mar 11 2 minutes ago, ptatc said: Yep. It would be interesting to see what kind of damage control is going on behind the scenes. Regardless of the reason, not a good look to the rest of the league. I kind of would have expected some kind of offensive from Ravens - you haven't gotten much. When there are reports out there of them meeting with Tray at same time Max was in the building - just not a good look.
March 11Mar 11 5 hours ago, Tony said: This is a simplistic way of looking at it. They did not break any rule, you are correct. Ethically, we're having a different conversation. And decisions have consequences. Teams will be more hesitant to trade with the Ravens. Players may be more hesitant to agree to terms with the Ravens. It also has created much more of a mess for teams than people realize. We know by reporting that multiple teams were in on Crosby. He was one of the first dominos to fall, trade was agreed to and the multiple teams that were involved in the talks pivoted to signing and agreeing to terms with other players to fill their roster. With the salary Crosby has, there has to be some planning involved in getting his contract to work with the rest of the roster. For a trade of this magnitude, and with the current injury state Crosby is in, medicals should have been reviewed before a deal was formally announced. Yep, totally fair assessment. Admittedly I was initially only looking at it through the lens of “teams will always exploit loopholes for a competitive advantage.”
March 11Mar 11 39 minutes ago, SoxAce said: Is there anyone who has looked sadder to be a Cleveland Brown?
March 11Mar 11 1 hour ago, southsider2k5 said: Yeah, this goes back to the good faith. This really bad. There is "legal" and this is pissing down the legs of your peers. I'm wondering if this leads to changes to the tampering period down the line.
April 7Apr 7 https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/vikings-wont-begin-g-m-search-until-after-the-draft#Vikings won’t have a new GM until after the draft
April 7Apr 7 1 hour ago, Kyyle23 said:https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/vikings-wont-begin-g-m-search-until-after-the-draft#Vikings won’t have a new GM until after the draftI actually think that makes more sense on the calendar than the “draft with the previous scouts” thing, and probably easier to hire your next group.But obviously most are tied to the coaching search. But the timeframe orgs select GMs is pretty silly
April 7Apr 7 Author Man this would have been a great draft with the two extra comp picks. Really sucks the NFL screwed the Bears over some BS definition of control.
April 7Apr 7 47 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:Man this would have been a great draft with the two extra comp picks. Really sucks the NFL screwed the Bears over some BS definition of control.That whole situation is insane. I have yet to hear a rational reason why the NFL dug in so hard on not giving them the picks. It wasn't punitive to Atlanta, there is truly no "victim" by awarding the picks to the Bears. The NFL simply fucked the Bears, there is really no other way to view it, it's so cut and dry.
April 7Apr 7 Author 25 minutes ago, Tony said:That whole situation is insane. I have yet to hear a rational reason why the NFL dug in so hard on not giving them the picks. It wasn't punitive to Atlanta, there is truly no "victim" by awarding the picks to the Bears. The NFL simply fucked the Bears, there is really no other way to view it, it's so cut and dry.That's what so weird about it. Everything happened exactly the way that the NFL wanted it to happen, and then poof. It's like they pissed someone off. Either that or they are scared of being seen as DEI by you know who.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.