Butter Parque Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 This is where the Sox win the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Excellent starting pitching so far. Garland, keep it going! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Master Buehrle Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Garland has his work cut out from him. Â If he gives up less than 3 ER than that's a quality start 1-5 for every pitcher. Â Let's go Jonny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rooftop Shots Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Would love to see Garland win this in Minny for an early confidence builder. It will also add some extra drama to Sunday nights ESPN game of Buehrle vs. Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 I was more worried about contreras than garland. I hope Garland pitches close to what Jose did the other day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch and Judy Garland Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 I don't really worry so much about Judy (he was lights ouit there once last year) but more on how our bats do against Radke. Still, beating a team at their home opener is harder to do than most think so we gotta feel good going into tomorrows game. Only downside is that Herm should probably (if Ozzie is gonna be careful) go unused. Let's get the bats going early so that we avoid Nasty Nathan along with Romero and co. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 actually id say Hermason and Vizaino should both be a no go for tommorows game....That said we should still be fine with Cotts, Politte, Marte, and Shingo hopefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabroni Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 actually id say Hermason and Vizaino should both be a no go for tommorows game....That said we should still be fine with Cotts, Politte, Marte, and Shingo hopefully. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed. Vizcaino threw a week's worth of pitches in that one game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(Jabroni @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 05:38 AM) Agreed. Vizcaino threw a week's worth of pitches in that one game. Too many pitches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 (edited) Heather's Fearless Prediction: JON shows up instead of JUDY! Edited April 9, 2005 by BridgeportHeather Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 01:07 AM) Heather's Fearless Prediction:Â JON shows up instead of JUDY! Â Â Hopefully we wont have to ask that question every time he goes out on the mound this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFanForever @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 01:59 AM) Too many pitches  Pitch counts are retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 01:11 AM) Pitch counts are retarded. agreed. They might as well count bullpen pitches if they want to get technical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:11 AM) Pitch counts are retarded. Â Totally agree on that. Back in the 20s and 30s, a "bullpen" might've consisted of 1 or 2 pitchers (that's IT), because starting pitchers went the distance (even throwing 150+ pitches) most of the time! I think the current decline in arm strength goes back to the pussification of pitchers way back in Little League, and climbs into the high school and collegiate levels as well; when they finally make it to the pros, they simply do not have the capacity to pitch like their predecessors did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 This infatuation with pitch counts in today's game is due to one thing .... Â $$$$$$$$$$$ Â By the time a team develops a good starting pitcher and then signs him to a multiyear, multimillion dollar contract, they don't want to risk their investment any more than possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:22 AM) This infatuation with pitch counts in today's game is due to one thing .... $$$$$$$$$$$  By the time a team develops a good starting pitcher and then signs him to a multiyear, multimillion dollar contract, they don't want to risk their investment any more than possible.  If they were trained in their early years to go the distance, it wouldn't even BE a risk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:23 AM) If they were trained in their early years to go the distance, it wouldn't even BE a risk! Â Consider that back in those days, there was 16 ML teams and now there are 30. Pitching is a valuable commodity in baseball. How many guys from that era never made it because their arms were dead at 22 or 23 years of age? It's more than just building up these pitchers when they are young. Arms do wear out. Some just happen sooner than others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:19 AM) Totally agree on that. Back in the 20s and 30s, a "bullpen" might've consisted of 1 or 2 pitchers (that's IT), because starting pitchers went the distance (even throwing 150+ pitches) most of the time! I think the current decline in arm strength goes back to the pussification of pitchers way back in Little League, and climbs into the high school and collegiate levels as well; when they finally make it to the pros, they simply do not have the capacity to pitch like their predecessors did.  pussification of pitchers  You also have kids throwing junk earlier and earlier, kids trying to reach 90 and 100 mph on the gun, more weight training, more leagues, more games, and more specialization. High School athletes use to play 3 sports as a norm, now they play one sport year round. Those rules regarding rest and innings are balanced by kids playing 12 months a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Sox Starting Pitching 05 Â 27 IP 1.33 ERA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 08:50 AM) Sox Starting Pitching 05Â 27 IP 1.33 ERA weve had success so far and im liking it, hopefully garland can go out and do well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backman Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 im lovin it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddy Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 this is one thing i havent been used to as a sox fan... and thats good pitching. but hell if this keeps up, or even stays close to what it is now, we've got a helluva season on the way... Â *KNOCK ON AS MUCH WOOD AS I CAN FIND* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Per Rotoworld:  Latest News Apr. 9, 2005 - 12:39 am et Jon Garland, who is scheduled to start Saturday, returned to the hotel during Friday's game due to the flu. He's questionable to face the Twins. If Garland can't go, the White Sox will use Mark Buerhle, who would be working on normal rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 We are gonna need Garland to flat out deal tonight. Simply because Radke is our daddy and will likely keep us under 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Radke is NOT our Daddy. 2004 vs CWS 4.50ERA, 20IP, 256A He's to be feared after the break. 02-04 vs CWS 4.73ERA, 64.2IP, 291A ... 02-04 Pre AS 4.59ERA, 02-04 Pos AS 3.62ERA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts