Kenny Hates Prospects Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:36 PM) Hypothetically, if Nix replaces Getz and Teahen replaces Q in LF, with Q moving to RF. Do we all still have an issue here? Yes because that means we suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I wonder if KW does this stuff because he loves to keep his fans engaged. Could you imagine how boring the offseason would be if we were fans of any other team (except the Yankees and Red Sox who make alot of moves)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:37 PM) [/b] Yes. Who steals a base? Who leads off? Who cares, and, who cares? Â I like a good baserunner too, but its a lesser concern to other factors. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (striker62704 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:38 PM) What scenario would you rather have? 3B Beltre SS Ramirez 2B Beckham  or  3B Beckham SS Ramirez 2B Polanco  Just curious. Adrian Beltre is one of the most valuable players in baseball IMO and I could easily see Polanco completely falling apart next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny Hates Prospects Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (striker62704 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:38 PM) What scenario would you rather have? 3B Beltre SS Ramirez 2B Beckham  or  3B Beckham SS Ramirez 2B Polanco  Just curious. This one because Beltre is probably the better bet to come on a 1-year deal. But the problem then becomes, how do we pay him when we just added $4M to Teahen? We've now got about $28.5-30M committed to Konerko, Jenks, Linebrink, and Teahen. No es bueno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeCredeYes Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 What are they saying on the radio? Is this definitely a confirmed deal? I hate this deal with a passion, Teahen is a zero tool player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usaf_msc Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Anyone touch on the fact that Teahen was a candidate to be non-tendered by the Royals? Sounds to me like the Royals got 'something' (and an OK something in Getz) out of Teahen instead of having to non-tender him. *shrugs* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:38 AM) People realize Polanco had a mediocre year at the plate and on the bases in '09 and is not 34 years old, right? 2B typically go down hill very fast especially when they reach their mid 30's. Age is my only concern with Polanco. He's incredibly baseball smart and hit's well with RISP. We need more of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:37 PM) [/b] Yes. Who steals a base? Who leads off? Beckham leads off. Beckham, Rios Nix, Ramirez, and Pods steal bases.  Beckham Rios Q Konerko DH AJ Ramirez Teahen Nix  Bench Retherford Kotsay Flowers Pods  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus kinski Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Does this make us more "grindy"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:43 AM) This one because Beltre is probably the better bet to come on a 1-year deal. But the problem then becomes, how do we pay him when we just added $4M to Teahen? We've now got about $28.5-30M committed to Konerko, Jenks, Linebrink, and Teahen. No es bueno. Why even worry about payroll at this point ? Either the Sox will increase payroll or dump a guy making beaucoup bucks . You know more is happening so stay tuned , we got all winter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuna Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 according to the white sox website this hasn't been confirmed and Teahan doesn't even know about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:17 AM) If true it opens the door for a Polanco signing. Â I know I'm incredibly late on this, but that would make this move pretty good. I'm just wondering if we picked up a guy who only hits well against us. And might this make Dye our DH? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:49 PM) Age is my only concern with Polanco. He's incredibly baseball smart and hit's well with RISP. We need more of that. Split stats like that fluctuate greatly from year to year, you can't acquire players based on their numbers with RISP. Did you know Polanco hit .278 w/ RISP and .258 w/ RISP and 2 out in '08? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 The White Sox MLB site only addresses this trade with a question mark and the Royals G. M. is not confirming this deal. Does anyone know if this trade is confirmed by anyone other than the N. Y. Times and Cowley? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:50 AM) Beckham leads off. Beckham, Rios Nix, Ramirez, and Pods steal bases. Â Beckham Rios Q I'm really not a fan of the opening of that lineup. Becks just doesn't belong in the leadoff slot; you're going to cost him so many RBI opportunities by putting him there. As written now we don't have a better option, but that is something we need to fix somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:55 AM) I know I'm incredibly late on this, but that would make this move pretty good. I'm just wondering if we picked up a guy who only hits well against us. And might this make Dye our DH? If he's re-signed sure, but I still doubt he will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:37 PM) [/b] Yes. Who steals a base? Who leads off? Â Alex Rios? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 06:56 PM) I'm really not a fan of the opening of that lineup. Becks just doesn't belong in the leadoff slot; you're going to cost him so many RBI opportunities by putting him there. As written now we don't have a better option, but that is something we need to fix somehow. I like Beckham at the 3 hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (balfanman @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:56 PM) The White Sox MLB site only addresses this trade with a question mark and the Royals G. M. is not confirming this deal. Does anyone know if this trade is confirmed by anyone other than the N. Y. Times and Cowley? I think it's interesting that Scott Reifert has yet to confirm anything via Twitter, given that he works for the White Sox he needs to wait for front office confirmation before announcing anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 This might excite me more if it was Alex Gordon instead of Teahan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantl916 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 12:04 PM) I think it's interesting that Scott Reifert has yet to confirm anything via Twitter, given that he works for the White Sox he needs to wait for front office confirmation before announcing anything. Â Yea i'm with Kalapse here... i think something isn't being said yet for a reason... im getting the feeling that this trade isnt just teahen for getz and fields... something else is coming our way or the players involved are incorrect... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 10:37 AM) [/b] Yes. Who steals a base? Who leads off? Beckham would lead-off in that instance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickofypres Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Fields, good riddance. Getz wasn't all that great either IMO. Â Wheres he going to play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I think it is either the Tribune or the Sun-Times saying the Sox confirmed this trade. Then they go on to say they think Beckham moves to 2B as Ozzie supposedly said he things GB can be a 2Bman? Apparently the team is never satisfied with what they put in place. Speculations runs rampant that Figgins will be signed to play 3B. Oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.