June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (LDF @ Jun 23, 2015 -> 09:10 PM) i wouldn't want to trade with Bos, the rtn will really not help that much. Yeah, going by the rumors ( Cole Hamels) so far this year Boston seems very reluctant in trading away certain younger players. Players the White Sox would be looking for in a trade.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 03:53 AM) Yeah, going by the rumors ( Cole Hamels) so far this year Boston seems very reluctant in trading away certain younger players. Players the White Sox would be looking for in a trade. on the rumors pages, i am kinda of piecing together an idea that many teams really do not want to sacrifice young prospects for a needed player to help in the playoff. that is right now. plus team are really over estimating the value of their players.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (LDF @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 06:44 AM) on the rumors pages, i am kinda of piecing together an idea that many teams really do not want to sacrifice young prospects for a needed player to help in the playoff. that is right now. plus team are really over estimating the value of their players. I forget where I said this the other day but more teams are willing to wait for their higher valued prospects to become MLB ready. The cubs would seem to be one example. They have plenty to trade but they realize they need more time to see who sticks, then the players that do not stick could very likely be traded this winter for pitching. I see Boston doing similar things with holding onto certain high level prospects. Both teams are loaded but not likely to make the playoffs so,imo, they are continuing with their respective rebuilds and see where they are at this winter. The ever increasing price of FA is making teams think otherwise about dealing top prospects. That's not to say no team will deal top prospects, just seems like prospects are holding more value in the eyes of some teams. That said. Maybe a team like Boston changes their perspective if a young lefty like Q was on the trade table. They do seem pretty adamant in keeping their best though so who knows? Edit: add the Dodgers to that list as well. Last winter there were reports about the Dodgers saying no to trading top prospects like Joc Pederson etc. Edited June 24, 201510 yr by BlackSox13
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 07:20 AM) I forget where I said this the other day but more teams are willing to wait for their higher valued prospects to become MLB ready. The cubs would seem to be one example. They have plenty to trade but they realize they need more time to see who sticks, then the players that do not stick could very likely be traded this winter for pitching. I see Boston doing similar things with holding onto certain high level prospects. Both teams are loaded but not likely to make the playoffs so,imo, they are continuing with their respective rebuilds and see where they are at this winter. The ever increasing price of FA is making teams think otherwise about dealing top prospects. That's not to say no team will deal top prospects, just seems like prospects are holding more value in the eyes of some teams. That said. Maybe a team like Boston changes their perspective if a young lefty like Q was on the trade table. They do seem pretty adamant in keeping their best though so who knows? Passan just wrote about this yesterday. They're not going to make wholesale changes, and certainly dont want to dump Ramirez and Sandoval for pennies on the dollar. Betts and Bogaerts are close to untouchable, along with Rodriguez and Swihart. The pitcher they value the most for the moment is Brian Johnson. Unless the White Sox view Rusney Castillo as a future star, there's not a good fit. Yoan Moncada has a disappointing 576 ops in the low minors (roughly 100 abs) so far but they wont trade him this quickly.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 08:32 AM) Passan just wrote about this yesterday. They're not going to make wholesale changes, and certainly dont want to dump Ramirez and Sandoval for pennies on the dollar. Betts and Bogaerts are close to untouchable, along with Rodriguez and Swihart. The pitcher they value the most for the moment is Brian Johnson. Unless the White Sox view Rusney Castillo as a future star, there's not a good fit. Yoan Moncada has a disappointing 576 ops in the low minors (roughly 100 abs) so far but they wont trade him this quickly. Do you have a link to the article? Would like to read his take on it.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 02:20 PM) I forget where I said this the other day but more teams are willing to wait for their higher valued prospects to become MLB ready. The cubs would seem to be one example. They have plenty to trade but they realize they need more time to see who sticks, then the players that do not stick could very likely be traded this winter for pitching. I see Boston doing similar things with holding onto certain high level prospects. Both teams are loaded but not likely to make the playoffs so,imo, they are continuing with their respective rebuilds and see where they are at this winter. The ever increasing price of FA is making teams think otherwise about dealing top prospects. That's not to say no team will deal top prospects, just seems like prospects are holding more value in the eyes of some teams. That said. Maybe a team like Boston changes their perspective if a young lefty like Q was on the trade table. They do seem pretty adamant in keeping their best though so who knows? Edit: add the Dodgers to that list as well. Last winter there were reports about the Dodgers saying no to trading top prospects like Joc Pederson etc. interesting, i am seeing Hou bringing up players and see if they stick like gallo. now they brought up another pitcher. position that they need to address. i see that with bos, but tor.... they are hose. all they have are pitchers.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (LDF @ Jun 23, 2015 -> 05:41 PM) for eaton, i think that it is that 2yr jinx that always reels its ugly head. It's the defense I'm much more worried about. It's really the horrendous April that's making his offensive numbers look bad. He hasn't been great in May or June necessarily but an OPS of .727 and .750 are a lot closer to what he was last year. However, it doesn't matter if his offense rebounds if his defense continues to be horrible.
June 24, 201510 yr QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 04:50 PM) It's the defense I'm much more worried about. It's really the horrendous April that's making his offensive numbers look bad. He hasn't been great in May or June necessarily but an OPS of .727 and .750 are a lot closer to what he was last year. However, it doesn't matter if his offense rebounds if his defense continues to be horrible. well i can deal with the lack of defense, if he brings up his avg.
June 24, 201510 yr Gracious, more declining veterans again? Too bad we didn't load up for Matt Kemp last year.
June 24, 201510 yr A reasonable comp with Samardzija is Garza 2 years ago. The Cubs received: Olt - top 50 prospect, but in serious decline Grimm - a 5th starter type Edwards - close to top 100 pitcher, but a bullpen guy Ramirez - another promising young pitcher At the time, the Cubs fans claimed it to be some massive haul, although it never looked like it to me.
June 25, 201510 yr http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/washing...al-notes-062415 Ken Rosenthal still saying astros interested in shark.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 07:16 AM) http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/washing...al-notes-062415 Ken Rosenthal still saying astros interested in shark. Appel, Phillips and Nottingham for Samardzija. Would the Astros do it?
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 07:26 AM) Appel, Phillips and Nottingham for Samardzija. Would the Astros do it? No, we're not going to get that much.
June 25, 201510 yr Didn't the Cubs get an incredible offer from Atlanta for Ryan Dempster, but Dempster used his "no trade clause" to stop the deal? If Shark continues to pitch well, I expect a very nice package of prospects.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 07:16 AM) http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/washing...al-notes-062415 Ken Rosenthal still saying astros interested in shark. I'd love to deal with Houston. So much depth that even if we don't get their top guys, we can still get a great return.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jun 24, 2015 -> 07:42 AM) Do you have a link to the article? Would like to read his take on it. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/10-degrees--t...-043408970.html
June 25, 201510 yr Author QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 08:26 AM) Appel, Phillips and Nottingham for Samardzija. Would the Astros do it? How about JD Davis, Nottingham, and AJ Reed for Shark. I was just looking at their prospects. Moran and Stassi have been bad. Jeez.
June 25, 201510 yr Knowing the White Sox, a package will contain some combination of 3 things: 3B, C, and SP.
June 25, 201510 yr Author QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 09:13 AM) Knowing the White Sox, a package will contain some combination of 3 things: 3B, C, and SP. For sure. Their top guys are Max Stassi © and Colin Moran (3B). They are both putting up .OPS around .600 though. Moran was a former top 5 pick and Stassi was highly regarded but they've been pretty bad.
June 25, 201510 yr "The Astros, Rosenthal says, are eyeing Samardzija and other pitchers, but the White Sox are not yet ready to sell" I really hope this is posturing, because there is no way in hell they have a shot at the postseason. If I am putting together a package with them, Im trying to nab 2 of Phillips, Reed, and Fisher or seeing if they would move Santana.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 08:34 AM) http://sports.yahoo.com/news/10-degrees--t...-043408970.html Thanks Caulfield. Lots of interesting stuff in that article.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 08:26 AM) Appel, Phillips and Nottingham for Samardzija. Would the Astros do it? QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 08:27 AM) No, we're not going to get that much. Am I missing something or does Appel look like a bust? I'd think they'd trade him ahead of McCullers and Velazquez at least.
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (scs787 @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 09:53 AM) Am I missing something or does Appel look like a bust? I'd think they'd trade him ahead of McCullers and Velazquez at least. Yeah, Appel's value is down. I just don't think half a year of the version of Samardzija that looks like a 3-4 starter is worth much at all. But, with Cueto now maybe looking injured and the Kazmir now maybe looking less available, who knows?
June 25, 201510 yr QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jun 25, 2015 -> 10:55 AM) Yeah, Appel's value is down. I just don't think half a year of the version of Samardzija that looks like a 3-4 starter is worth much at all. But, with Cueto now maybe looking injured and the Kazmir now maybe looking less available, who knows? I agree. I would trade Shark for Appel immediately before Houston changed their minds. If they want Shark to come back, the Sox will have the same shot as they do now.
June 25, 201510 yr I'd trade Shark for Appel if they can't go on a sweet run and to .500 and a few games out by the deadline. If they decide they want to try and sign Jeff in the offseason, they can. Hell they can discuss it right now like Hammel certainly did with the Cubs.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.