Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Awful non-call in the 11th inning.

Featured Replies

  • Replies 64
  • Views 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Umpiring this year has been awful

Did Ventura even come out and argue and ask the ump to get help?

 

Also bullpen and clutch hitting are gone.

 

Resting the pen in Texas seems to have ended their mojo.

bad call... but runner wouldnt have been out so inning would have continued.

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:11 PM)
Did Ventura even come out and argue and ask the ump to get help?

 

Also bullpen and clutch hitting are gone.

 

Resting the pen in Texas seems to have ended their mojo.

Of course he did.

 

Bottom line was Albers made a huge mistake way ahead in the count and that was the game. Back on track tomorrow

How come other teams replay every f***ing thing imaginable and get every review they ask for and we can't do s***?

162 game season. No reason to dwell on 1

Times like this the Sox could use the leadership of Drake LaRoche

QUOTE (Deadpool @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:21 PM)
162 game season. No reason to dwell on 1

 

Totally understand what you are saying but it isn't just one. it is the last 6 or so games. We are in a funk and we need to get out of it quickly

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:22 PM)
Times like this the Sox could use the leadership of Drake LaRoche

i wish our guys had that TWTW

So Springer goes back to first and Gattis still hits the bomb out of here. Sox lose still, right?

  • Author
QUOTE (harkness @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:12 PM)
bad call... but runner wouldnt have been out so inning would have continued.

Any batter or runner who has just been put out, or any

runner who has just scored, hinders or impedes any fol-

lowing play being made on a runner. Such runner shall be

declared out for the interference of his teammate

 

From MLB rulebook. I don't see why that doesn't apply. A strikeout is a putout.

QUOTE (harkness @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:12 PM)
bad call... but runner wouldnt have been out so inning would have continued.

 

Batter would have called out for the third out.

 

 

QUOTE (chw42 @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:19 PM)
How come other teams replay every f***ing thing imaginable and get every review they ask for and we can't do s***?

 

Interference is not reviewable.

 

QUOTE (pettie4sox @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:24 PM)
So Springer goes back to first and Gattis still hits the bomb out of here. Sox lose still, right?

 

See above.

I was less mad when I didn't think he was out. Another disgraceful umpiring effort

Yeah if that's the case, that's super f***ed.

QUOTE (fathom @ May 17, 2016 -> 09:35 PM)
I was less mad when I didn't think he was out. Another disgraceful umpiring effort

 

Balls and strikes are calls you have to make right away and are made by millimeters. I get pissed at bad calls but can forgive.

 

This interference was so blatant that I can't let it go easily.

QUOTE (Deadpool @ May 18, 2016 -> 05:21 AM)
162 game season. No reason to dwell on 1

Not one, but two. That loss in Texas ....

Literally every Chicago writer/beat reporter is saying that the base runner would have just went back to first. Reading the rule seems to indicate to me he would have been out, what am I missing here?

QUOTE (harkness @ May 17, 2016 -> 10:12 PM)
bad call... but runner wouldnt have been out so inning would have continued.

 

7.09 (a) - It is interference by a batter or runner when:

After a third strike he clearly hinders the catcher in his attempt to field the ball. Such batter-runner is out, the ball is dead, and all other runners return to the bases they occupied at the time of the pitch;

 

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:58 PM)
Literally every Chicago writer/beat reporter is saying that the base runner would have just went back to first. Reading the rule seems to indicate to me he would have been out, what am I missing here?

 

The media is clueless in just about everything.

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ May 17, 2016 -> 11:11 PM)
Did Ventura even come out and argue and ask the ump to get help?

 

Also bullpen and clutch hitting are gone.

 

Resting the pen in Texas seems to have ended their mojo.

 

I'm not so sure. It's nice to see the lineup still have some fight in them when the pen goes into mental midget mode.

 

Last year in a game like this, down 2 the guys just wanted to leave.

 

QUOTE (reiks12 @ May 18, 2016 -> 12:04 AM)
7.09 (a) - It is interference by a batter or runner when:

After a third strike he clearly hinders the catcher in his attempt to field the ball. Such batter-runner is out, the ball is dead, and all other runners return to the bases they occupied at the time of the pitch;

 

And just to clarify. In the case of Correa, since he was already out, he can't be called out again. So because he interfered with the throw, the base runner would be called out.

I can't recall getting screwed by umpiring so much in one season. Especially this early.

At the very least the umps should have huddled and talked about it, but nothing

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.