Jump to content

SoCalChiSox

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,767

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SoCalChiSox

  1. SoCalChiSox
    MOAR RHH.
  2. SoCalChiSox
    There is zero chance he gets 40 AAV even on a short term deal.
  3. SoCalChiSox
    I wonder what upcoming scoop the team promised to Sullivan in exchange for this article?
  4. SoCalChiSox
    Yeah those two are nowhere near enough for Castillo.
  5. SoCalChiSox
    Possibly...but perhaps RH felt he could get something for him at the time. He still might. Maybe he wants to see if one of those pitchers will bite at 8m before being forced to give away RL for some scrub prospect in order to make the money work.
  6. SoCalChiSox
    Thats why they need to move ReyLo even for nothing, to get the 2m off the books so they can make the 10m SP and 7m Tommy La Stella work. Im shocked he hasn't been moved yet now that the salary is in place.
  7. SoCalChiSox
    I thought I saw somewhere we only had 15m left and were offering SPers 8m (presumably so as to leave 7m for La Stella) but the targets out there wanted 10m (I think the foodies said this latter part). Maybe that explains why they were trying to move ReyLo cause opening up that extra 2m would make a difference.
  8. SoCalChiSox
    The price is probably really high still. Cherington has to aim high because the only way they will eventually win is with good prospects since they cannot spend with that owner. He may hold on to him till the deadline if he doesn't get his price.
  9. SoCalChiSox
    JR is saying "thats a great idea about the 10m and incentives guys, but what's the plan if he hits the incentives? Where's the money coming from cause it ain't coming from my pocket"
  10. SoCalChiSox
    Now that the number is fixed, does this mean he can be traded now? Open up that 2m to help pay for something else.
  11. SoCalChiSox
    Good point....how quickly he can get back to past performance is the wildcard with TJS. Theres no way for the systems to know that. If they are going all in for a WS I would think they would prefer more of a sure thing. On the other hand, at least this option won't force us to gut half the farm like a trade prolly would.
  12. SoCalChiSox
    The point is the budget. Any fat you can cut will help open up money for additional players, i.e. La Stella, SP etc.
  13. SoCalChiSox
    Yep, the article says he feels Jose is a very deserving MVP.
  14. SoCalChiSox
    La Stella would probably fill that role against RHP assuming he isnt starting at 2B if Madrigal is moved.
  15. SoCalChiSox
    Plus we could also get Brantley that way too.
  16. SoCalChiSox
    Its almost certainly just a ploy. Isn't TOR undesirable for FA due to tax issues? The agent just needs to create leverage in order to squeeze a little more money.
  17. SoCalChiSox
    Because it has been suggested by rabbit among others that Hendriks will tap them out financially which will necessitate them cleaning out the farm to trade for cost controlled answers for other needs rather than simply paying for them with just money.
  18. SoCalChiSox
    I'm well aware of that but I'm also aware one of the few things this team does reasonably well is develop pitching. We also know that since ownership puts arbitrary budget limits on the FO, apparently even in the middle of a World Series window, that having a stable of young promising pitching is very important in ensuring the window is as long as possible given those budget issues and given that ownership already has a deep aversion to giving long-term deals to pitchers.
  19. SoCalChiSox
    Lol @ they are lottery tickets. Their signing bonuses suggest otherwise, bro. So the Sox spend like 3m each for a lottery ticket? Thats a pretty expensive lottery ticket. Last I checked you can get a lottery ticket from the liquor store for like a couple bucks not a few million, but maybe there's runaway inflation now that I'm just not aware of.
  20. SoCalChiSox
    Hopefully LH signs with TOR. I dont want to blow up the second part of the window because they are cheap. Add Rosenthal or whatever for a year or two. Bummer can be the closer and Heuer can be the setup. Im perfectly fine with that. If JR isnt going to pay for pitching with money now, they sure as he'll won't in 2023 either, so we need Dahlquist, Kelley, Thompson etc then to replace Keuchel, etc and maybe even Giolito if he wants to test FA. We NEED that second stream of talent.
  21. SoCalChiSox
    I think his main objection, which most and maybe all of us share is we are sacrificing the future for the present, when we could and should be able to have both.
  22. SoCalChiSox
    I'm really spooked by rabbits twitter post. I dont like this idea of draining the farm just cause they don't want to spend so if thats the plan to compensate for blowing our wad all on Hendriks then I'd rather pass on Hendriks if that is gonna be what they will do to "buy" a SP and a LH bat. Sounds like there's gonna be no second part of this window. They will clean out the young pitching for 2021-2023. JR and TLR won't be around after that so they don't give a damn about anything after 2023. This is so stupid.
  23. SoCalChiSox
    It sounds like they caved on the 4th year as others have suggested. On the one hand that doesn't seem too smart, on the other hand, we know they have to overpay to get anything done and we are all tired of JR pinching pennies. I hope they can still get that LH bat (actually two of them, La Stella PLUS Schwarber) and 4th SP. I wonder if they can ship off ReyLo to save a little coin in order to help offset Schwarber's 5m. La Stella should be around 7m or so.
  24. SoCalChiSox
    Unless they miss on Hendriks i don't see where the budget money is for something other than a super cheap bridge or a trade for a cost controlled guy. I really want a savage LH bat. They need to address this issue pronto
  25. SoCalChiSox
    Is Jimmy suggesting Q? I thought we couldn't afford him?
×
×
  • Create New...