Milkman delivers

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 6, 2009 -> 08:57 AM) Unforgiven was indeed an excellent western. Tombstone, I enjoyed a lot, but I think its not enough to be "great". In fact, its really two films. They changed directors while making it, and it shows. The first half to two thirds was good, not really classic in style but very well done. Good character stuff, great fun too. Then about two thirds in, it becomes a modern-age action flick set with older costumes, and that takes something away from it. Not sure which director was which, but, the whole ride of the avengers aspect got pretty ridiculous. Still a fun movie, but, not as good as Unforgiven, or 3:10 to Yuma, or even Silverado. There are also a few movies out in recent years that aren't westerns per se, but are very akin, and very good. The Missing, for example, was a good film. Seraphim Falls was decent. Tombstone was one of the best westerns ever made. It was "directed" by Cosmatos. But, when he died, Kurt Russell came forward and said that he actually directed the whole thing, and used Cosmatos' name to draw attention to it. It was an agreement between the two to keep it secret until Cosmatos was gone. Tombstone > 3:10 To Yuma

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 6, 2009 -> 08:51 AM) I can't believe so many people disliked 3:10 to Yuma. I thought it was one of the better westerns made in the last decade or two. Not that there have been a ton of them made in that period, but, there are some. I'd say Open Range was better.

QUOTE (MHizzle85 @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 08:45 PM) Only question about Frank & the HOF is if he's gonna be 1st ballot. Agreed. I think he clearly deserves to go in on his first try, but I don't have nearly enough confidence in the voters to actually follow through on that. A lot of voters are just plain jagoffs.

QUOTE (The Bones @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 08:45 PM) So, do you honestly think his work in American Psycho and The Machinist was bad? If so...I would like to know who would have done better with those roles. Also, you are comparing him to 2 of the best actors around (PSH and DDL). Not a whole lot of actors can do what they do. I admitted he is not the best of the best but he certainly is not a bad actor. I would say is is above average at what he does. He's also very dedicated to his work. He lost 60 pounds for the Machinist then had to play Batman just months later and gained 100 pounds for that. If he is good enough for movie people like Roger Ebert, Christopher Nolan, and Werner Herzog then I would like to know what makes you say he is bad actor. Do they have awful taste as well? Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's bad, but I don't see him as anything more than pretty good. He definitely is extremely dedicated and a very method actor. And Ebert has been very lenient with his critiques in the last few years with his illness.

QUOTE (The Bones @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 08:03 PM) So did I. I don't understand why Bale is getting so much crap around here. Do I think he's one of the greatest actors of our time? No. But he is certainly not bad. I would say his work in American Psycho and The Machinist is his best. Next, I would say he was good in Rescue Dawn, Yuma, and The Prestige. Then, you have the 2 Batmans and I'm Not There which weren't his best performances but neither of which took away from my enjoyment of the movie. And people in the film industry obviously think he is alright because he continues to get pretty good work. I can't wait to see Public Enemies. A lot of terrible actors continue to get plenty of work. The fact that they continue getting hired says nothing about their talent, but plenty about the American public's awful taste.

QUOTE (SoxFan101 @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 07:07 PM) I consider myself a pretty tough critic when it comes to actors, hate keanu reeves, and I enjoy almost everything Christian Bale does. The only movie that I thought was horrible was 3:10 to Yuma... and one of my other favorite actors, Russel Crowe, was in it too.... so blaming that one on the script. Again, you're basing his ability on the movies he's in. Once he can carry a boring movie, as Daniel Day-Lewis and Philip Seymour Hoffman did in There Will Be Blood and Doubt, respectively, then I might start thinking he's a very good actor.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 05:23 PM) He's as much in the upper echelon of actors as a Brad Pitt or a Tom Cruise ever was... what is your criteria? Ability to make himself cry? I think he's done that. Ability to land the lead high-grossing films? Only the highest grossing ever... a wide-range of accents and roles? He's done that too. To say he's not in the upper echelon of current actors is to ignore reality. Christian Bale is the hottest thing in Hollywood right now. He's starved himself for roles, he's bulked up, he's played an every man, he's played the man... he's done it all. This is as much an indictment on the current chaff the acting population is made up of right now, but regardless, Bale is incredibly talented, but if you prefer your Phillip Seymour Hoffman's that's your prerogative. Every American accent he does has a lisp that he can't overcome. And to the second bold part, yes. I prefer very good actors like Hoffman.

QUOTE (SleepyWhiteSox @ Feb 5, 2009 -> 03:46 PM) This show's still on?? Are you kidding? Colbert is extremely popular.

QUOTE (BobDylan @ Feb 4, 2009 -> 05:40 PM) I didn't know a Terminator movie was capable of this. Christian Bale is as much a hack as the DP and people need to get off his wiener. He's an actor, nothing more. And not that great of one either.

Buy her a case of K-Y jelly. Nothing says Valentine's day like a whole lot of butt lovin'.

What exactly was the "I Told You So" award?

QUOTE (GREEDY @ Feb 3, 2009 -> 10:26 AM) Just in case anyone cares: Abreu sucks in RF. I would have to think Quentin would move to RF if Abreu replaced JD. Abreu is both a veteran and a good friend of Ozzie's. He will remain in RF no matter what.

Ha, I don't think I even post enough anymore, nor much inflammatory stuff to be up for this. I see my reputation still precedes me.

QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 09:42 AM) Except his arm was down and not around his head so that doesnt always work. Whether or not the arm is behind or in front of the QB's head is not written anywhere in the rule. It was probably a fumble, but it did appear that maybe his arm had started the forward movement when he got hit. At any rate, not reviewing that play was completely inappropriate. I wouldnt be surprised if the NFL didnt review it only because it was so close and they didnt want their replay system scrutinized. The officiating is NOT why the Cardinals lost. That being said, it was attrocious. The roughing the passer was bulls***, there were two non-calls on what were probably intentional grounding on Roethlisberger, there was a potential clip on Hightower on the Harrison run back, the running into the holder was iffy, and the hold on Ward was iffy. Also, is there still the halo rule for punt returns? I dont remember if they removed it or not but if they didnt it should have been called in the 4th. And Harrison is a dumbass and is lucky he wasnt tossed. That was almost a punch I also noticed all of these things. From what I can remember, it was the worst called Superbowl I've ever seen. It reminded me of every single Patriots Superbowl win with every call going against the opposing team and every break going for New England.

So, anyone else call in sick today?

QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 08:07 AM) Ray Park will probably be redeeming as Snake Eyes. But only because he will not talk I assume you agree on Raul Julia, though.

QUOTE (SoxFan101 @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 04:13 AM) Now it might be a bad movie, but streetfighter bad is just hard to do. As bad as Street Fighter was, it still had the extremely memorable performance of Raul Julia to make it worth seeing. I doubt the GI Joe movie has an actor of that caliber to carry it. I believe at the time of the filming, Julia knew he had only a short time left on Earth, so he just had fun with the role and overacted the hell out of it. And it was great. I still enjoy watching that movie today because of his performance in it.

QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:51 PM) That was another classic game. That 4th quarter was incredible, by my God, the refs were terrible. I can't say it was classic because of the officiating. If the refs didn't suck so much, that would have easily been one of the best Superbowl games I've ever seen.

QUOTE (whitesoxbrian @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:39 PM) What do you want them to review? His arm was hit and the ball was jarred loose...all while the ball was behind his head. That ball was steady in his hand enough on the follow through for it to be an incomplete pass. Either way, the simple fact that it wasn't even reviewed, added with the rest of the awful officiating, is outrageous.

QUOTE (knightni @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:33 PM) Nope. His WRs keep getting the MVPs. Is that a real argument or are you joking?

Does this second Superbowl in his first five seasons put Roethlisberger into the HOF already?

QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:10 PM) Very happy the Cardinals came back. They indeed showed they could hang and they most definitely showed that they belonged. Why was there no review on that last play by Warner though? The refs had money on Pittsburgh.

What a terrible ending to the biggest football game of the year. At least it ended the way the entire game went, with the Cardinals getting f***ed in the ass by the officiating crew.

QUOTE (zenryan @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 05:07 PM) I'd say the majority of the casual UFC fans would rather watch the fighters just stay on their feet. Nothing annoys me more than hearing people groan as soon as the fight hits the mat. I also like submissions. I hate when a fight goes to the judges, in MMA and boxing.

QUOTE (lostfan @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 12:35 PM) What does "andate" mean? I know what the rest means. I think he told him to walk through s***. Andar is to walk, and the "te" at the end makes it reflexive.