Everything posted by chw42
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (Jake @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 07:31 PM) His stuff looks really great. Just can't throw all fastballs to lefthanders...it's pretty simple. Zero margin for error when he does that He's had his good stuff for the majority of this bad streak, which is why it's so frustrating to watch him pitch like s***.
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
Altuve is even smaller than Dustin Pedroia. I find that hard to believe.
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
Here's what Gavin needs to do...stop throwing fastballs right down the middle to start the count or when you are behind. USE YOUR f***ING CURVEBALL, YOU HAVE IT TONIGHT.
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
Just wanted to stop by and say Gavin Floyd f***ing sucks.
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 06:36 PM) I am going to call you Sog from now on. Wandy's wand brings rods. O.o And I can't believe 05 was almost 7 years ago. It's crazy.
-
Jordan Danks being recalled
Jordan Danks was 7th in wOBA in the International league at .418. http://www.fangraphs.com/minorleaders.aspx...0&players=0
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 03:22 PM) Yeah, and then I would have sworn you said "I know the feeling" I said I can relate because I currently do not have a girlfriend. I was not talking about my non-existent girlfriend.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 03:01 PM) I would've sworn you and JoeCoolMan were lamenting this one day in PHT... That was JoeCoolMan. Somebody said something about their girlfriend not knowing baseball and Joe just straight up said he didn't have one. Funny as hell.
-
GT: Houston Astros @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (sunofgold @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 01:03 PM) Beat the Astros like it is 2005. Hope that DA 'OYD pitches a great game. Get past this Tim stage and into the Pink. Jesus, no wonder Gavin's been awful as of late. He heard that nickname and is now even more mentally unstable.
-
Jordan Danks being recalled
QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 7, 2012 -> 11:22 PM) I've never done this before. But Sunofgold and Soxmaniac (pretty sure it's the same person) are on ignore. Pathetic. I'm laughing my ass off, it's so bad it's hilarious. Whore DaDa...Jordan Dunks. It's priceless.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 01:50 PM) Remember when you were talking about your non-existent girlfriend? When did this happen? I think you got the wrong guy.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 01:03 PM) That's because of components beneath those areas require open space, particularly the cellular antennas...putting stuff (such as screens) in front of them impedes the signals to/from the devices. There's always a way. On the Galaxy S I disassembled a few months ago, the antenna was on the side of the phone, with a connector on the bottom. But that connector was part of a larger multi-purpose chip that included sensors for the capacitive keys, the microphone, etc. If you don't have capacitive buttons ( or buttons period), that chip can be much smaller. I'm fairly positive they can move the antenna elsewhere and still get it to work. The antenna system of the HTC Sensation is etched on its back cover (although that had a death grip issue). Plus, didn't the iPhone 4 have an antenna system that was wrapped around the phone or something? That caused some issues during launch.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 12:13 PM) Bezels are necessary to prevent accidental screen touch. Without a bezel, every time you touched an edge, you'd accidentally move, press or shift the screen from touch sensor. You can see this at play if you've ever moved a tablet from one hand or the other and accidentally grabbed slightly too much...it turns the page, etc...it does something you didn't want or intend...and it's annoying. That's why they use bezels. They're not just for show. That's more or less on the side of the phones though, not the top and bottom. I see a lot of wasted space on the bottom of most phones.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 11:42 AM) Which I have seen and those are insane. Ironic how all these same folks were making fun of the iPad as an oversized iPhone, and now they are putting that thing up to their ear. Yeah, that thing's ridiculous. They plan on coming out with a 5.5 inch one, better get some bigger pockets. I do like that it was designed for note taking, but I'd rather buy a separate tablet for that. What I would like, however, is for a phone that has nothing but a screen in the front (no surrounding bezel). You can then make the screen like 5 inches without having to worry about form factor. The Galaxy Nexus sort of started doing that already.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 11:24 AM) One of the criteria when i was phone shopping was "biggest screen possible." Did you get a Galaxy Note by any chance then?
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 11:01 AM) I personally find Apples iPhone, in modern times, a bit undersized...however, not absurdly over-sized like a lot of modern Androids. That's not to say there aren't Android based devices available that are of good portable size. I personally think the sweet spot for a phone/all-in-one portable device is around 4.0-4.2 inches diagonal, no smaller, no bigger. While Apple falls short of that (for now), many Android's have way overshot it, but not all. The iPhone 5 will be probably hit 4", which is exactly what I'd like to see. As for bland...that's the point. Apple's modern tech is usually bland/simple, but sleek looking...their entire design philosophy is simplicity, where a lot of their competitors point is counter to that view, full of bells and whistles, which IMO complicates everything. TL;DR: Apples iPhone is a bit undersized, but not as over sized as some Android's. Design is intended to be bland/simple. I've gone through phones with a lot of differing screen sizes. My first Android phone had a 3.2 inch screen, my second and third ones had 4 inch screens, now I have one with a 4.7 inch screen. I don't think I can ever go back to a phone with a screen less than 4 inches. Once you get used to it, there's no going back (that's what she said). The good thing about the newer Android phones is that they're extremely slim. Although they are fairly large in terms of dimensions, they don't feel all that oversized in your pocket. IMO, a 4.3 inch screen is probably ideal. I feel as if 4 is a bit small and 4.5 is getting a bit too big. A 4.3 inch screen with a HD resolution (that's a very high DPI though) would be awesome. I know Apple hasn't changed their screen size because they've researched that a 3.5 inch screen is ideal for the average person to use it with just one hand (that's for men and women). But I feel like Apple will have to change that rule in the future. I know I won't ever even think about getting an iPhone if it keeps its current screen size. As for the UI, I never found Apple's UI sleek. If you want that, look at the Windows Phones. Metro UI is about as modern, minimalist and sleek as you can get. I used to do some themeing on my iPod touch before and I never kept the stock menus and icons.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 08:44 AM) I've had a few problems in the past. I had an iMac whose hard drive crashed. Twice. My original iPad also had a problem with the dock connector and had to be replaced. Apple products are certainly not immune to breaking or having problems just like anything else. They just tend to happen fewer and farther between than with other brands I've used. When they did break though, Apple always honored their warranties and made it easy to replace the item. Apple always did have a nice warranty. I went through like 4 iPods once. The first one had a broken home button, second one had poor screen quality. Third one just stopped working. They ended up giving me a refurb for the last one and I still have it. The battery is pretty much dead, I might get like 3-4 hours of full operation on it. I feel as if the iPhone and the iPod touch were incredibly awesome when they first released, because they were more or less the first of their kind. Now they just feel small and bland to me.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 8, 2012 -> 08:26 AM) Overcharging? It seems to me like maybe they've streamlined their production costs and leveraged their position within the industry to negotiate very profitable deals with the carriers to build those revenues. iPhones, considering their capabilities and quality are very reasonably priced in the market. They certainly are not gouging. The subsidies Sprint and Verizon pay are ridiculous, especially Sprint, who took a $15.5 billion gamble. They paid through the nose so much that they're going to sell iPhones on prepaid plans with Virgin Mobile. The cost? $650 for an iPhone 4S,$550 for an iPhone 4. iPhone 4 = 2 years old, $550, that's far from reasonably priced. It also shows just how much the carriers have to subsidize the phones to get them affordable. Apple is charging these carriers a whole ton of money and I'm not totally sure that they're really making as much money as they should on it.
-
AND THATS A WHITE SOX WINNER!!
Astros are 6-19 on the road, let's try for a 4 game winning streak before heading on the tough road trip.
-
GT: Toronto Blue Jays @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (Jake @ Jun 7, 2012 -> 10:12 PM) Stuff=good command=bad I'd say it's a combination. Velocity seems lower, I haven't seen him hit 93-94 as often. Slider is still moving, but it's easy to lay off since it's rarely in the zone. Plus, he's hanging it more often. April Peavy was a Cy Young candidate. May and June Peavy's been slightly above average.
-
GT: Toronto Blue Jays @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 7, 2012 -> 10:10 PM) Jake could have easily pitched a shutout...he was pretty unlucky in that second inning. Hawk has no patience for guys that walk people...he always would get on Jose for that too...Contreras would give up two runs but because he walked 5 people, Hawk would be on his case the entire game. That second inning was very frustrating to watch. Hudson should have had that grounder by McCoy. Bad hop or no bad hop, it never seemed like he got in front of the ball.
-
GT: Toronto Blue Jays @ Chicago White Sox
QUOTE (Melissa1334 @ Jun 7, 2012 -> 10:05 PM) i love how hawk just keeps praising peavy and that it was a gutsy performance yet ripped edwin jackson when he had starts like that Unfortunately, starts like this by Jake just makes me think he's losing it. Perhaps fatigue is already catching on. He hasn't had good stuff for his last 4-5 starts.
-
AND THATS A WHITE SOX WINNER!!
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 7, 2012 -> 10:06 PM) f*** ORLANDO HUDSON!!! ORLANDO HUDSON Hudson made up for his poor defensive play tonight. This was a huge win. You avoid a sweep and you get some momentum going back into interleague play. Let's sweep those lowly Stros.
-
GT: Toronto Blue Jays @ Chicago White Sox
Yeah...the Hudson experiment is going to come to an end soon.
-
2011-2012 NBA Season Thread
LeBron showed up when it really mattered. Props to him. Boston's done.