MLB.com abuses the term “instant classic”. They said that about this game. I never once thought a game that was 6-1 after 2 was an “instant classic”. Maybe I have higher standards. Of course mlb.com has had about half a dozen instant classics this offseason …
When Roberts does that two years in a row we can say it’s no longer an outlier. Until then you can plan on him being injured just like you can plan on the sun rising. He will be Byron Buxton until he proves otherwise.
I just look at trends. He got hurt in the minors. He was hurt in every year in the majors but 2023. No doubt a full season rather than a third of a season he gets hurt. There’s one aberration where he plays more than 100 games. The numbers are what the numbers are.
Can’t someone read about them daily? Dive into the stats on any number of sites. Gather info from any number of sources, often more entertaining than the torture it is to watch and listen to a White Sox game.
So everyone believing him when he lies is much worse than no one believing him when he lies? I would think the lie is the important thing, not whether or not the recipients of the lie are duped.