Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Is “The 78” Dead? Part XIII, Ishbia buys an Amtrak depot

Featured Replies

https://dearchicago.com/

Today, we’re proud to announce our plans for a new, privately funded, soccer-specific stadium and entertainment district at Roosevelt and the river. We expect to open in Spring 2028. This new home for the Chicago Fire Football Club will anchor the city’s future 78th neighborhood and serve as a catalyst for job creation, economic development and vibrant community life.

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Views 222.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Great, more of this "global warming" Chinese hoax bullshit. Sullivan is trying to push the hoax even more. I just watched a Joe Rogan Experience podcast and Joe actually said we are in a global coolin

  • Sambuca
    Sambuca

    This will make the conversation better.

  • The Sox aren’t moving to Nashville or anywhere. Nashville will get an expansion team or nothing. 

Posted Images

Wow, looks like if the Sox get a new stadium it will be in Arlington Hgts unless there’s enough room for 2 stadiums at the 78.

Edited by The Mighty Mite

Yeah I thought the owner of the 78 wanted two stadiums there? I don't think this particularly kills the Sox building there. I'm sure a lot of other things will, though.

Off topic question but why are most Soccer stadiums especially in Europe and now in America built with right angles in the corners copying the field, should be some curvature like American Football stadiums so fans don’t need neck surgery after a game as they have to be craning their necks quite a bit. That was one of the bad things about old Comiskey if you were sitting in the low boxes down by the foul poles.

Edited by The Mighty Mite

21 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said:

Yeah I thought the owner of the 78 wanted two stadiums there? I don't think this particularly kills the Sox building there. I'm sure a lot of other things will, though.

Continues the trend of making Jerry look weak.

One of those slots is now hypothetically filled. Time to put up or shut up.

59 minutes ago, kba said:

The developer has said in the past there's room for both stadiums at the 78. 

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/possible-future-home-of-white-sox-could-have-a-second-stadium-developer-says/3578694/

 

Yeah I'm cautiously optimistic that this is actually GOOD news for us. It's like filling the first home or shop in a new development - once one person bites, it makes the whole thing viable and others get on board.

This will have the city/state fund the infrastructure that Jerry needs and gives the ownership team confidence that the whole region is going to be developed. They aren't left holding the bag hoping to fill the whole thing.

 

IMO it's definitely good news in regards to having two "anchor tenants" at the site, and the ask for infrastructure $ should be more palatable if/when the Sox do confirm now that the Fire are locked in, especially if they privately finance the stadium themselves (Sox).  

1 hour ago, The Mighty Mite said:

Off topic question but why are most Soccer stadiums especially in Europe and now in America built with right angles in the corners copying the field, should be some curvature like American Football stadiums so fans don’t need neck surgery after a game as they have to be craning their necks quite a bit. That was one of the bad things about old Comiskey if you were sitting in the low boxes down by the foul poles.

https://intisumberbajasakti.com/why-are-football-stadiums-built-with-curved-structures

Jerry expects Mansueto to set up the potable water at the 78, exterminate all vermin. Then once that is done, on Fire's dime, we will agree to move in

Hey Jerry - Sell the team!!!!

I'm ready with the popcorn for whoever wants to enjoy this thread devolve into a shitshow once a certain few people arrive with their opinions on the 78.

lets say there were two stadiums at the 78-- can they both face the skyline? I think one would block the other, right?  As parcel  is longer north/south than it is east/west

Edited by Fielder Jones

Just getting out in front of it here as well, Sox are still "considering" the site. 

 

Quote

Responding to an inquiry from WGN News, the White Sox said they’re still considering “The 78” as an option for a new ballpark.

“Related Midwest first approached the White Sox about building a new ballpark on a piece of property they were developing, and we continue to consider the site as an option,” a team spokesperson said in a statement. “We believe in Related Midwest’s vision for ‘The 78’ and remain confident the riverfront location could serve as a home to both teams.

“We continue to have conversations with Related Midwest about the site’s possibilities and opportunities.”

 

the Fire getting a ballpark village, water taxis, surrounding buildings going up... i mean, that is not happening without the Sox. i've been to Fire games and it's amazing support from a dedicated fanbase but that aint no anchor tenant

  • soxfan18 changed the title to 78 Dead? Or even more alive? Fire announce plans for SSS
  • Author
34 minutes ago, Sleepy Harold said:

Just getting out in front of it here as well, Sox are still "considering" the site. 

 

 

This is very reassuring. While there was room for 2, my worry was that with the Sox dragging their feet, maybe Related would say screw it and put the soccer stadium in the middle of the property and leave them out.  

  • Author
43 minutes ago, Fielder Jones said:

lets say there were two stadiums at the 78-- can they both face the skyline? I think one would block the other, right?  As parcel  is longer north/south than it is east/west

The soccer stadium isn't going to have a view of anything outside except the sky. It will be closed on every side with a canopy covering all the seats (at least, based on the rendering). 

I read elsewhere that a new White Sox stadium at the 78 location would only cost $400 million. If that is accurate I would think it would be built there.

  • Author
2 hours ago, The Mighty Mite said:

Off topic question but why are most Soccer stadiums especially in Europe and now in America built with right angles in the corners copying the field, should be some curvature like American Football stadiums so fans don’t need neck surgery after a game as they have to be craning their necks quite a bit. That was one of the bad things about old Comiskey if you were sitting in the low boxes down by the foul poles.

Most of the old stadiums in England were built as individual 'stands', or sides. And that allows them to expand by tearing down and rebuilding 1 side at a time. 

Liverpool's Anfield is a great example of this: 

 

Any new stadium is just copying that design for aesthetics. 

1 hour ago, MiddleCoastBias said:

Yeah I'm cautiously optimistic that this is actually GOOD news for us. It's like filling the first home or shop in a new development - once one person bites, it makes the whole thing viable and others get on board.

This will have the city/state fund the infrastructure that Jerry needs and gives the ownership team confidence that the whole region is going to be developed. They aren't left holding the bag hoping to fill the whole thing.

 

we sure this means the state is helping foot the bill?

This probably puts a little pressure on the Sox to step up with some serious cash before all the land is scooped up by developers. At a minimum if they just sit around waiting on a handout they might find themselves short on options.

gimme a concrete donut stadium

22 minutes ago, soxfan18 said:

The soccer stadium isn't going to have a view of anything outside except the sky. It will be closed on every side with a canopy covering all the seats (at least, based on the rendering). 

Yea based on this you would think the Fire will be the south anchor, as the skyline view is almost completely irrelevant, with the Sox (hopefully) being the north.

  • Author
33 minutes ago, WBWSF said:

I read elsewhere that a new White Sox stadium at the 78 location would only cost $400 million. If that is accurate I would think it would be built there.

I think they might have meant it would only cost the state $400 million.  

Any chance Masueto gets brought in as part of the new ownership group? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 4

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.