BA makes the cases for 3 guys at 1-1

10 hours ago, hi8is said:

Far from it

Think he was joking

10 hours ago, Stinky Stanky said:

That Y at the end makes the name Russky or Czech.

Still sounds like it though

4 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Still sounds like it though

Same difference 😁.

Wrong thread.

Edited 4 hours ago4 hr by DirtySox

12 hours ago, Chick Mercedes said:

BA makes the cases for 3 guys at 1-1

this sure makes Emerson the most logical choice IMO. Allows Sox to get the best years of Colson at short and then decide if he moves to 3rd when Grady would be ready. One of Vargas/Colson/Mune potentially wouldn't be with the team in 2-3 years in this scenario (unless Mune becomes a full Time DH and either Vargas/Colson move to first. If they select Roch...I have no idea what they do with the current roster, as I would expect him up next year.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by EloyJenkins

2 hours ago, EloyJenkins said:

this sure makes Emerson the most logical choice IMO. Allows Sox to get the best years of Colson at short and then decide if he moves to 3rd when Grady would be ready. One of Vargas/Colson/Mune potentially wouldn't be with the team in 2-3 years in this scenario (unless Mune becomes a full Time DH and either Vargas/Colson move to first. If they select Roch...I have no idea what they do with the current roster, as I would expect him up next year.

Taking a HS player with Lackey and Roch on the board based on a "timeline" would be the dumbest possible decision and one that could set the franchise back 5-6 WAR a season. Emerson is in no way a lock to be a star, in fact of the three at the top he's probably 2x more likely to bust as a HS kid with a long development path ahead. You don't take a HS kid here unless he's like Bryce Harper. He ain't that.