Chicago White Sox Posted 2 hours ago Author Share Posted 2 hours ago 30 minutes ago, BamaDoc said: I hope your surprising prediction is wrong. I think moving Hagen Smith or for that matter Schultz to the pen now would be developmental malpractice. If they are close to their innings limit and aren't up starting, I could see bullpen for last month or 6 weeks to get a intro to MLB but otherwise the team really needs at least one of them to be successful starters. 100% agree. Him and Schultz need to continued to be developed as starters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 40 minutes ago, BamaDoc said: I hope your surprising prediction is wrong. I think moving Hagen Smith or for that matter Schultz to the pen now would be developmental malpractice. If they are close to their innings limit and aren't up starting, I could see bullpen for last month or 6 weeks to get a intro to MLB but otherwise the team really needs at least one of them to be successful starters. 10 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: 100% agree. Him and Schultz need to continued to be developed as starters. Agreed. And I hate that they’re already doing this with Taylor. And I get he can move the rotation eventually, but I’d still rather not waste MLB service time on him being in pen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: Agreed. And I hate that they’re already doing this with Taylor. And I get he can move the rotation eventually, but I’d still rather not waste MLB service time on him being in pen. https://www.mlb.com/whitesox/news/grant-taylor-role-2026-white-sox-bullpen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijames1957 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago I know I'm probably in the minority but I don't like Meidroth as the 2b moving forward. He does nothing exceptionally well and his total lack of any pop in his bat and run production should be enough to move on from him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago C Teel/Quero 1B Murakami/Mead 2B Meidroth/Acuna SS Montgomery 3B Vargas/Mead LF Hays/Benintendi CF Acuna/Baldwin RF Pereira/Baldwin/Kelenic DH Benintendi/Quero So a bench of Quero, Mead, Baldwin, Kelenic. I think Korey Lee could win that last spot on the bench too and have 3 catchers so Quero can DH more. I think Sosa gets traded, if not, he's the last bench guy. SP Martin SP Smith SP Kay SP Burke SP Cannon RP Paez RP Gilbert (L) RP Alberto RP Vasil RP Newcomb (L) RP Leasure RP Taylor CP Dominguez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 53 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: If the Sox put Hagen Smith in the bullpen to start the season, then I’ve lost all confidence in this org. Is this something you actually want to see happen? As for Sosa, despite 22 HRs he was only a league average hitter last year. He was certainly better in the second half, but was substantially better against LHP (121 wRC+) than RHP (101 wRC+). Those splits could make him an everyday guy at 2B if the defense was sufficient, but don’t really work for a full-time DH role. I also don’t agree with you on his defensive performance at 2B. It looked bad per the eye test and graded out as -10 runs per DRS. Not sure why you think he’s going to suddenly better out there. Not that I’m advocating for it, but how would it be any different than calling up Grant Taylor last year and putting him in the bullpen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, ChiSoxFanMike said: Not that I’m advocating for it, but how would it be any different than calling up Grant Taylor last year and putting him in the bullpen? Burn an extra year of service for starting on the roster day 1 for one. If he never was sent back down, you’d have 6 years instead of 6+ Edited 2 hours ago by Bob Sacamano Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted 1 hour ago Author Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, ChiSoxFanMike said: Not that I’m advocating for it, but how would it be any different than calling up Grant Taylor last year and putting him in the bullpen? Well to be clear, I didn’t like the idea of moving Taylor to the bullpen. That being said, Taylor also completed dominated the minors and was ready to produce in the majors. The only real reason to hold him down was to build up his innings without burning team control, which I would have done. Instead, the Sox are targeting to get him 100 innings in the majors this year as a reliever in hopes of him possibly joining the rotation next year with 5 years of control remaining. Meanwhile, Smith and Schultz both have plenty to work on in action to their need for inning build-up. As such, they both need to be down in AAA or AA focusing on their development. A big spring training or a need at the major league level should not change that plan. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaDoc Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) So the MLB article talks of getting Taylor to 100ip but Venable hopes to use him to win games. I would be wary of back to back appearances or anything that could hurt him. It is interesting but you have three right-handers in Vasil, Taylor, and Hicks who have some starting experience/ability to go more than an inning. At some point it might make sense to use each every third game for two innings. 50g = 100ip. Getting a couple days rest might protect them a bit. If we are out of the race or post trade deadline, it might make sense. If someone traded(Hicks), you could add in one of the TJ guys or a youngster. Edited 1 hour ago by BamaDoc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted 1 hour ago Author Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, BamaDoc said: So the MLB article talks of getting Taylor to 100ip but Venables hopes to use him to win games. I would be wary of back to back appearances or anything that could hurt him. It is interesting but you have three right-handers in Vasil, Taylor, and Hicks who have some starting experience/ability to go more than an inning. At some point it might make sense to use each every third game for two innings. 50g = 100ip. Getting a couple days rest might protect them a bit. If we are out of the race or post trade deadline, it might make sense. If someone traded(Hicks), you could add in one of the TJ guys or a youngster. I think that’s going to be the plan for Taylor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tray Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago IMO, the WSox have to keep Sosa's RH bat in the line-up as much as possible... possibly as a 1B/DH platoon with Murakami or at 2B for a few games. The more HR power in the line-up, the merrier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.