Chisoxfn Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 4 hours ago, Autumn Dreamin said: Jeff Cohen is spending some time on the MiLB side of Camelback: Wish I knew he was back there- was watching that same game with my son and his friend. They just have snagged 10 balls between the two of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, WhiteSox2023 said: I wouldn’t waste much time assessing what this guy says. He also said this… He wrote an article suggesting Eloy Jimenez was opening eyes after 8 PAs. White Sox fans might cringe at slugging disappointment's Blue Jays comeback bid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, WhiteSox2023 said: I wouldn’t waste much time assessing what this guy says. He also said this… Wade is AAAA filler… Kelinic has to prove he can do it consistently during the like real regular season games for once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago Wade > Benetendi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: Wade > Benetendi The Sox don’t owe Wade $31 million dollars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 33 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said: The Sox don’t owe Wade $31 million dollars. And Wade can't play LF either...well, sort of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 42 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said: The Sox don’t owe Wade $31 million dollars. Sunk Cost Fallacy: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 4 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: Sunk Cost Fallacy: Sure, but show that to Jerry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 15 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: And Wade can't play LF either...well, sort of. Neither can Benintendi, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 9 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: Sunk Cost Fallacy: Not an economist but that doesn't seem to make sense. If they have an 80 million budget. His salary is 31. They need to pay him that. Which means they have 49 to spend on the rest of the team. It not money paid in the past. Its money currently paid on the payroll. Its not like equipment that is paid for in the past and they owe nothing on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, ptatc said: Not an economist but that doesn't seem to make sense. If they have an 80 million budget. His salary is 31. They need to pay him that. Which means they have 49 to spend on the rest of the team. It not money paid in the past. Its money currently paid on the payroll. Its not like equipment that is paid for in the past and they owe nothing on it. They are paying him whether he is here or not. It's a sunk cost. The contract is guaranteed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 21 minutes ago, ptatc said: Not an economist but that doesn't seem to make sense. If they have an 80 million budget. His salary is 31. They need to pay him that. Which means they have 49 to spend on the rest of the team. It not money paid in the past. Its money currently paid on the payroll. Its not like equipment that is paid for in the past and they owe nothing on it. Half that for one year.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: Half that for one year.... But why would anyone want that bad money ($15.5 million per year) if you can just sign another veteran outfielder like Austin Hays for 1-year and $6 million? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, southsider2k5 said: They are paying him whether he is here or not. It's a sunk cost. The contract is guaranteed. Correct. But he is still on the books for this year. Its not like they can magically increase the budget if he's not here. He is still a charge fir the payroll. If they cut him and eat the sunk cost, it still costs them more toward the payroll as his replacement costs more payroll even if its the minimum. Edited 4 hours ago by ptatc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 7 minutes ago, ptatc said: Correct. Butbus still on the books for this year. Its not like they can magically increase the budget if he's not here. He is still a charge fir the payroll. If they cut him and eat the sunk cost, it still cost them more toward the payroll as his replacement costs more payroll even if its the minimum. There's also the opportunity cost they're spending on Benintendi. There are only 13 offensive roster spots, and Benintendi will be taking one of them. That means they can't carry one of Pereira/Kelenic/Hill/Mead/etc. It would be worth the incurred league minimum to DFA Benintendi and roster Pereira, for instance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, ptatc said: Correct. Butbus still on the books for this year. Its not like they can magically increase the budget if he's not here. He is still a charge fir the payroll. If they cut him and eat the sunk cost, it still cost them more toward the payroll as his replacement costs more payroll even if its the minimum. Which is also offset by losing someone else to a 26 and 40 man roster spot, as well as the development time lost, and opportunity cost of who could have been playing LF. And if 800k for an extra player makes that decision for you, sell the team and get out of the business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, WhiteSox2023 said: But why would anyone want that bad money ($15.5 million per year) if you can just sign another veteran outfielder like Austin Hays for 1-year and $6 million? Look at his numbers and compare them to the rest of the league's free agents. Benny is a minor league contract with an invite to spring training for the chance to get a couple of million dollars if he can make the team as a free agent. He has zero value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoUEvenShift Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, southsider2k5 said: Which is also offset by losing someone else to a 26 and 40 man roster spot, as well as the development time lost, and opportunity cost of who could have been playing LF. And if 800k for an extra player makes that decision for you, sell the team and get out of the business. Selling the team over 800,000 Sounds great but we know that isnt happening. JR gave Getz a budget. He needs to work within it for better or worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 43 minutes ago, DoUEvenShift said: Seems early for Gonzalez but I guess hes been bad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 minutes ago, ptatc said: Selling the team over 800,000 Sounds great but we know that isnt happening. JR gave Getz a budget. He needs to work within it for better or worse. Again, sell the team. And if Getz doesn't have freedom to spend 800k, that tells me everything I know about how much "better" things are with the change, because the top is still the same block it is always been. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 51 minutes ago, DoUEvenShift said: 5 catchers? OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said: 5 catchers? OK. Don't they usually send 3 to the daily scheduled game, and 2 to the B game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 12 minutes ago, WestEddy said: Don't they usually send 3 to the daily scheduled game, and 2 to the B game? Must be just to get all the pitchers reps. Thought it was usually just 4 tho and then a coach would help out. Little spring curiosity maybe I'll ask someone if I get to a game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 34 minutes ago, ptatc said: Selling the team over 800,000 Sounds great but we know that isnt happening. JR gave Getz a budget. He needs to work within it for better or worse. $780K is the MLB minimum salary for 2026. If Getz can’t spend that where he wants, there is truly no hope until Jerry is gone. Edited 4 hours ago by WhiteSox2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.