Damn dodgers

4 minutes ago, HeGetzUs said:

Damn dodgers

The Dodgers are just on another level of existence.

Hopefully that removes them from a Detmers trade then and we can get him

1 hour ago, HeGetzUs said:

Hopefully that removes them from a Detmers trade then and we can get him

Sure, if you’re willing to let go of Bonemer. No thanks.

I’m only trading him for Mason Miller or an ace with control - and Detmers isn’t in that class for me.

1 hour ago, HeGetzUs said:

Hopefully that removes them from a Detmers trade then and we can get him

Cubs are the heavy favorite for Detmers now

Just now, fathom said:

Cubs are the heavy favorite for Detmers now

You think the main piece for that trade would be Shaw?

6 minutes ago, chw42 said:

You think the main piece for that trade would be Shaw?

Or Pedro Ramirez

I’m going on a limb here, but I will predict the Sox trade Wolkow for a rental catcher. Feels like there are a handful of guys they are looking to cash in on and Boston was one and George is another.

2 hours ago, HeGetzUs said:

Hopefully that removes them from a Detmers trade then and we can get him

I’m ok with Sox not paying that price

7 hours ago, hi8is said:

Sure, if you’re willing to let go of Bonemer. No thanks.

I’m only trading him for Mason Miller or an ace with control - and Detmers isn’t in that class for me.

It Bonemer is what it takes for Detmers then the answer is a hard pass on him

3 minutes ago, HeGetzUs said:

It Bonemer is what it takes for Detmers then the answer is a hard pass on him

100%

9 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

100%

Holmes, Ray, Gausman would be the order of my interest at the moment…too many starters still out there to trade Bonemer away

Bonemer & Roch dreamin'

1st; Mune, Vargas

2nd: Bonemer

SS: Roch

3rd: Colson , Vargas

C: Teel, Stephson

DH: Mune, Vargas, Colson

UT: Meidroth

15 minutes ago, HeGetzUs said:

Holmes, Ray, Gausman would be the order of my interest at the moment…too many starters still out there to trade Bonemer away

Agree. Get Clay Holmes

4 minutes ago, Bonemer, I Hardly Know Her said:

Yes, but unfortunately it would cost you.

11 minutes ago, Falstaff said:

Bonemer & Roch dreamin'

1st; Mune, Vargas

2nd: Bonemer

SS: Roch

3rd: Colson , Vargas

C: Teel, Stephson

DH: Mune, Vargas, Colson

UT: Meidroth

If we’re rosterbating on a Sunday, here is my dream Roch & Bonemer lineup:

1. Antonacci, 2B*

2. Murakami, DH*

3. Vargas, 1B

4. C. Montgomery, 3B*

5. Bonemer, LF

6. B. Montgomery, RF*

7. Teel, CA

8. Cholowsky, SS

9. Peters, CF*

Chase & Baldwin on the bench as UT guys. Get good a good platoon parter for Peters in CF and a RH hitting defensive oriented backup catcher.

1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:

If we’re rosterbating on a Sunday, here is my dream Roch & Bonemer lineup:

1. Antonacci, 2B*

2. Murakami, DH*

3. Vargas, 1B

4. C. Montgomery, 3B*

5. Bonemer, LF

6. B. Montgomery, RF*

7. Teel, CA

8. Cholowsky, SS

9. Peters, CF*

Chase & Baldwin on the bench as UT guys. Get good a good platoon parter for Peters in CF and a RH hitting defensive oriented backup catcher.

If Bonemer can play LF I like your lineup better, YES !!

2 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Yes, but unfortunately it would cost you.

I'll do anything

34 minutes ago, Bonemer, I Hardly Know Her said:

I'll do anything

Well well well....