Jump to content

Angels need some pitching?


GGajewski18
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (peavy44 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 12:49 PM)
No one will takes john danks for this salary.

Don't the Angels have a tv deal like the Dodgers coming up soon? If so, money won't be a problem for them. They were already looking for pitching before this news.

Edited by chisoxfan310
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chisoxfan310 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 02:13 PM)
lookingfor de Angels have a tv deal like the Dodgers coming up soon? If so, money won't be a problem for them. They were already looking for pitching before this news.

No, they don't. Time Warner apparently is getting completely screwed on the deal with the Dodgers and so even if the Halos got a new contract it wouldn't be anywhere close to the Dodgers deal unless Time Warner somehow turns around their luck with the legal cases they're losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 01:14 PM)
No, they don't. Time Warner apparently is getting completely screwed on the deal with the Dodgers and so even if the Halos got a new contract it wouldn't be anywhere close to the Dodgers deal unless Time Warner somehow turns around their luck with the legal cases they're losing.

The Angels are in the 3rd year of a $3 billion 20 year contract. .Not Dodgers territory, but not bad.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

QUOTE (peavy44 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 12:49 PM)
No one will takes john danks for this salary.

 

 

QUOTE (peavy44 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 01:41 PM)
U ain't just going get nothing for danks.

 

 

QUOTE (peavy44 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 02:14 PM)
Jake peavy got 2 top prospects john danks can get one top prospect.

 

:huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danks does have value. 200 innings of moderate toilet is better than less innings or full toilet. Surprisingly, there is value but maybe not until next deadline.

 

There isn't any value in that when he's making 14 million.

 

He ain't going anywhere.

 

We'll get to watch him do his Jaime Navarro impression for another two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 05:19 PM)
Soxtalk said like 36-6 no to that deal.

 

Danks had a major injury and people were optimistic that he could return to his old self after some recovery time. 2008-2011 Danks >>>>>> Hector Santiago.

 

I'm the first to admit the optimism was wrong and Danks sucks now, but let's not act like Danks has always been Dylan Axelrod Sr..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Aug 10, 2014 -> 08:29 PM)
Danks had a major injury and people were optimistic that he could return to his old self after some recovery time. 2008-2011 Danks >>>>>> Hector Santiago.

 

I'm the first to admit the optimism was wrong and Danks sucks now, but let's not act like Danks has always been Dylan Axelrod Sr..

This was like 3 weeks ago. 2011 was 3 years ago. Santiago is wayyyyy better than Danks and 14 times better considering the price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...