Y2Jimmy0 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:33 PM) When I think of Quintana and the Cubs I envision a trade involving Baez and Castro, with their side eating some of his remaining contract. Schwarber and Gleyber Torres minimum or I hang up the phone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sockin Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 (edited) Sale calls Hahn to discuss direction of Sox Edited December 4, 2015 by Sockin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:14 PM) If anyone can provide of summary what Hahn says, it would be greatly appreciated. I will not be able to listen to it at that time. I'll do it. I have a plan period at school 7th hour. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 4, 2015 Author Share Posted December 4, 2015 http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/158763720 Sox seek offense at winter meetings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:19 PM) Now that's funny. The guy who even in hindsight said trading Jeremy Reed was a mistake thinks a 22 year old who hit .320 with power in AAA and can play SS and was a top 5 prospect as a 21 year old is not mlb ready and high risk. Do not acquire. Your entire narrative has been destroyed. Wrong again, Dick. I said it was a bad trade on paper - and it was. You look at things retrospectively. Constantly. Always. Further, in this case, the Sox would be trading FOR the prospect and not trading of the prospect. Surely you can see the difference. Now, please tell me the top TEN Major league prospect plus starting catcher that the Cubs will trade for our #3 starter (we don't really have one of those - but if we did). You're 0/2 in your attempts at "gotcha" today, Dick. Keep trolling me and try for a 3rd. Edited December 4, 2015 by GreenSox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 QUOTE (Sockin @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 01:41 PM) Sale calls Hahn to discuss direction of Sox I think the implication that non-tendering Tyler Flowers indicates any sort of "direction" is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (GreenSox @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:54 PM) Wrong again, Dick. I said it was a bad trade on paper - and it was. You look at things retrospectively. Constantly. Always. Further, in this case, the Sox would be trading FOR the prospect and not trading of the prospect. Surely you can see the difference. Now, please tell me the top TEN Major league prospect plus starting catcher that the Cubs will trade for our #3 starter (we don't really have one of those - but if we did). You're 0/2 in your attempts at "gotcha" today, Dick. Keep trolling me and try for a 3rd. So if trading the prospect is bad on paper, trading FOR the prospect would be good on paper. Selling high on Jeremy Reed wasn't a mistake. You eventually will figure that out. Edited December 4, 2015 by Dick Allen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:35 PM) Schwarber and Gleyber Torres minimum or I hang up the phone. I'd much rather have that deal too, Hahn should concern himself with obtaining the best possible package more than one which fills our current roster. However, I just have this sinking feeling he'll base any trade for Q around multiple ML players to win now (which is going to leave us with a package like Baez and Castro) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 4, 2015 Author Share Posted December 4, 2015 White Sox GM Rick Hahn said the team will seek to add infield help with offense in mind . F/A and trades. ( David Freeze and Brett Lawrie?) https://twitter.com/MLBBruceLevine/status/672863820449116160 Not sure who freeze is lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Way to go Levine, Sox fans read that piece on the Sox site too, nimrod. When will Levine just go away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 12:59 PM) So if trading the prospect is bad on paper, trading FOR the prospect would be good on paper. Selling high on Jeremy Reed wasn't a mistake. You eventually will figure that out. Jesus I can't believe people say it was a bad trade to this day lol that trade was part of the reason why we won a f*cking World Series. Edited December 4, 2015 by soxfan2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 @MLBBruceLevine: White Sox right handed starter- Third baseman -middle infield help will be Nashville targets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:48 AM) @MLBBruceLevine: White Sox right handed starter- Third baseman -middle infield help will be Nashville targets Really seems like they don't want to go with Erik Johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:48 AM) @MLBBruceLevine: White Sox right handed starter- Third baseman -middle infield help will be Nashville targets Nashville? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:48 AM) @MLBBruceLevine: White Sox right handed starter- Third baseman -middle infield help will be Nashville targets Sonny Gray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:57 AM) Nashville? Winter Meetings are in Nashville Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:03 AM) Winter Meetings are in Nashville Gotcha. I figured it was a typo because Levine is an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 6, 2015 Author Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:51 AM) Really seems like they don't want to go with Erik Johnson. I don't think that a second. Sox have 4 lefties with one righty. They are basically trying to get what they were supposed to have this year is a righty in the number 2 spot that shark was to fill which didn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:10 AM) I don't think that a second. Sox have 4 lefties with one righty. They are basically trying to get what they were supposed to have this year is a righty in the number 2 spot that shark was to fill which didn't happen So you think they add a righty, keep Johnson, trade Q for a haul? Don't see them eating any money to move Danks so he should be locked into a spot. Edited December 6, 2015 by soxfan2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:12 AM) So you think they add a righty, keep Johnson, trade Q for a haul? Don't see them eating any money to move Danks so he should be locked into a spot. I'd love it if they'd throw Danks in the bullpen as the long man, but they won't do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:15 AM) I'd love it if they'd throw Danks in the bullpen as the long man, but they won't do that. He was a solid back of the rotation starter though so I don't really mind if he's in the rotation. Maybe if he's doing good in June/July, we could deal him to a team that needs a starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 6, 2015 Author Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:12 AM) So you think they add a righty, keep Johnson, trade Q for a haul? Don't see them eating any money to move Danks so he should be locked into a spot. Thats one way to go is keep johnson and trade Quintana to fill alot of holes. Or you include johnson in a trade then you still have 4 lefties and open spots in rotation. So yes needing another right handed starter somewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 Right handed starters on FA market that would interest me: Kenta Maeda Henderson Alvarez Trevor Cahill Doug Fister Edwin Jackson Mat Latos Tim Lincecum Brandon Morrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 6, 2015 Author Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:15 AM) I'd love it if they'd throw Danks in the bullpen as the long man, but they won't do that. Can't see them doing that. Can still start tho numbers aren't great tho not many 5th starters are great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 6, 2015 Author Share Posted December 6, 2015 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 10:21 AM) Right handed starters on FA market that would interest me: Kenta Maeda Henderson Alvarez Trevor Cahill Doug Fister Edwin Jackson's Mat Latos Tim Lincecum Brandon Morrow Also Mike leake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts