All Activity

Yeah, the KCMO voters won that deal. Sales tax goes to pay for a $3 billion stadium ($1b from Chiefs), $300 million facility and $1 billion entertainment district. Chiefs pay $7m rent. They'll pay it off in ~470ish years.

That’s the only way I listen to podcasts. Too much dead air otherwise.

Probably by Getz’s request.

I knew something was off. 🤣

If the Bears do wind up in NW Indiana then the Cardinals should move back to Chicago and either play in Soldier Field or Arlington Heights, the Cardinals were Chicago’s first pro football team.

The people in Kansas are doing handstands over the Chiefs moving there.They seem to think the tax revenue (sales tax) and other money makes the deal wortwhile.

It's a grego.

I assume this is a typo?

I wish all Sox fans good health so they can live to see Ishbia take over and clean out everything from the previous ownership group.

Just my opinion but I can easily see why politicians have told the Bears to basically screw themselves. The outstanding debt that is still owed on the first renovation of Soldier Field is a big issue and they have said so, along with having to try to subsidize a very wealthy McCaskey family isn't sitting well with voters given the economic situation around the nation amidst all the political chaos. Remember politicians are more about getting reelected than helping the Bears. Personally like with the Giants and Jets, to me it's simply not that big of a deal if they play outside of Chicago, they are still the Chicago Bears. It's just a name we're talking about after all.

Also listening to podcasts at 1.3+ speed is not for the faint of heart.

Well, Gary/Hammond could get, what, 10-11 surges in dining and hotel stays, and then have to service the stadium for the whole year? I suppose it becomes an entertainment district if they do concerts, college football, etc. And Chicago still keeps the "civic pride" of "having" an NFL team.

Also, they cut that out of the podcast, funny enough

Actually very close Ohtani had a 74% in zone contact rate compared to 72% for Mune. Ohtani left the league at a younger age, so not an apples to apples comparison.

if that's true ("much higher"), it doesn't seem to bear out in any meaningful way in the stats. Ohtani had a 0.016 higher average, lower OBP, lower SLG Ohtani's K rate in the MLB has increased vs NPB (obviously to be expected) He strikes out every 3.38 ABs vs every 3.19 ABs in the NPB Ohtani is below league average in Zone Contact (MLB: 82.5%, Ohtani: 75.9%)

I don't know where to find it, but I think Murakami's in zone whiff rate is much higher.

Doing anything else would be stunning

I'm looking at Murakami's NPB stats vs Ohtani's, I gotta be missing something, is there a reason why Murakami's K rate is so much more alarming than Ohtani's In the NPB, Murakami struck out every 3.28 ABs Ohtani struck out every 3.19 ABs I think a bigger reason why teams didn't go all in on Murakami is because of his defense/lack of a real position, more than his high strikeout rate. Ohtani can at least fall back on his arm NPB Stats I couldn't find their zone contact/whiff stats to compare them

I don't think anybody should self-deport, but Caulfield was talking about 3/36, if I remember correctly. And a few of us got swatted down for suggesting somebody like Murakami could sign with the White Sox. NostraCaulfield mocked me for suggesting 3/45.

Merry Christmas, guys. Thanks for the banter.

Wow, what a slip. LOL. I guess we know who the Sox are drafting.

@caulfield12 lost the ban bet. The proof is in the pudding. Fairbanks did not receive over $20 million. He received $13 million. Also, the Sox signed Murakami for $34 million, which is an individual free agent contract above $17.5 million prior to opening day.

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to all Soxtalk members. Brighter days are coming.

From what I've seen most people in KC and Missouri aren't too happy about the Chiefs moving out of state. Even the Missouri politicians aren't happy about it. The more I've thought about it the more I find it amazing that Illinois hasn't approved the Bears Arlington Heights site. It would be a great thing for the area. If something doesn't change and Indiana offers the Bears a tremendous deal the Bears are going to move out of state, The states of Kansas and Indiana view a NFL franchise as an asset. Even tho the money is putting more money into the NFL billionaire owners pockets Kansas and Indiana think its worth it in the long run.