H. Right now, you’re outnumbered by more than 2 to 1 in that viewpoint. While it’s certainly possible the administration will do everything in its power to force as many back to work and off unemployment rolls, there’s simply no path back to profitability for some or even many of the major industries noted in your “treatise.” Part of the problem was signing off on a compensation system that provides many workers significantly more than they were making previously...for at least four months. Why would you realistically expect them to feel incentivized to go back to work after reading stories like the South Korean nightclub or about 1/3rd the Tyson Foods plant in Waterloo contracting the virus. When we burn through our essential workers and burn out most of our doctors and nurses, what happens then?
But this is precisely what the administration wants...for everyone just to collectively throw their hands up in the air and agree with your point H. Why the hell not? What do we really know, after all this time? What’s to lose? How much worse can things actually get? They’ve pretty much given up on testing...and actually following guidelines that THEY created. To quote Reagan, “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." Hmmm...
The truly sad aspect is that hundreds of thousands will die when 90% of all this could have been prevented with a serious, coordinated and timely response (see Germany) in February or even early March. It should be noted, perhaps unsurprisingly, that Angela Merkel’s background is in science, not branding.
So let’s just put it this way. Imagine it’s December 7th, 1941...can anyone imagine FDR informing 48 state governors that they were each responsible individually for coordinating the response with their respective state militias? We keep hearing this is a war...we’re on wartime footing, but it’s morphed into a political, economic and cultural war more-so than a health care battle. We can’t wish or hope it away, we have to science the hell out of it. Which is precisely when any chance at “winning” was lost to the virus, which doesn't discriminate and takes no side, besides looking for hosts to either kill or incubate inside of before multiplying/reproducing.
Greg, I guess you are in your 30’s or more likely 40’s. They talk about the kids from the 80’s being the ME Generation. Remember that? There was a point in American history where more people were willing to put the good of the American people ahead of their own self-interests. “To ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country,” a quaint notion now seemingly dead and buried. Maybe the greatest, most enduring lesson from this whole situation will be the tremendous cost of refusing to work together, whether it’s with our neighbors, neighboring states or even our neighbors in the global community. If we continue to see every situation as “us vs. them,” we will never overcome the problem...because too many will look around, see others not following the rules and decide the risk is worth it. It’s a classic economics concept called opportunity cost. China and authoritarian states take that choice away from the people...believing they know best how to keep people safe. There’s certainly a consequence when people don’t or aren’t allowed to think for themselves. We saw it here in Wuhan with the poor initial response from local leaders. But how can we argue that our freedom-oriented system is any better when we’re constantly presented with these choices...yet we keep choosing to hurt others due to our wants outweighing the obvious needs of others?
And the King will say, 'I tell you the truth, when you did it to one of the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were doing it to me.”