Milkman delivers

I thank you.

What makes this loss any different or worse than the other 74 so far?

These guys really don’t disappoint. I started following as soon as it was going into the bottom of the 9th. You just know they will blow it.

Don’t forget fun!

I thought this was viewership ratings at first. I thought that made sense. Then I realized they were rating the actual announcing, and I still thought the same thing.

71.

69 would’ve been funnier.

Drank a buttload of Busch Lights.

Sox luck. The quarter lands in a crack and is not clearly heads or tails.

Ha! Adios, dipshit. “I usually only represent baseball players, but I guess I’ll make an exception.”

By definition, mid-rotation would have to be either 2-4 or just 3. Some semantics to go along with the grammar discussion.

Thinking about when the Sox picked up Vazquez, I still get a boner. That rotation was absolutely disgusting on paper and all JV had to be was the fifth starter. Then the addition of Thome and that team should’ve been something else.

No, there’s a pretty bonkers Frasier discussion going on in SLaM.

I think you mean “imply”.

Designated for assignment by the Marlins. That is definitely the end of one’s career.

Ah, ideally he’s not an attempted murderer like his uncle.

Right back at you. I understand it’s a heated topic.

Okey dokey.

Simply because I’m not looking at everything through that lens? If that’s how you see things, more power to you. I was looking at it purely as numbers.

In regards to Chicago specifically, I generally don’t think of there being a “majority” at all. I basically consider it to be equally distributed. So when someone says it’s a majority black plus Hispanic, it doesn’t quite add up in my mind. Like I mentioned before, it could also be considered to be black plus white, or Hispanic plus white. Just seems an odd way of breaking it up. He explains it better.

Basically every day, but I suppose more regularly south of 31st.

I guess I never really hear it phrased the way he put it. In this instance, I’d think a more normal way to phrase it would be the majority is non-white. Easier to parse and not get confused. More just about how different people can read the same things in different ways.

Oh boy, don’t turn it into this crap ? We were arguing numbers, not politics.

Looking at the map they use, I didn’t realize that the parts of Bridgeport north of 31st street were such low percentage white. Learn something new every day.

That is possible, but it certainly doesn’t seem that way. I’m there a lot. Unless Chinatown is considered to be part of Bridgeport?