Kyyle23

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 10, 2016 -> 11:03 AM) The Orioles make no sense. Why not offer Latos more money and get him instead? Gallardo isn't even that good anymore and the pick attached to him lowers his value even more. I thought Gallardo was pretty good last year?

I will be glad when this thread finally ends. This is the longest saddest plodding-est thread for a player that we all merely kind of want but dont want to part with a draft pick.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 10, 2016 -> 07:34 AM) But the article isn't about that. There is a poll/survey at the end and the "fans" chose the Astros, Blue Jays and Tigers. The individual writer ranked them all and wrote individual summaries. Where is he wrong? You're telling me that the Future Sox writers or mods here would write the same article and put the Royals 10th just to get revenge and couldn't put aside their individual biases to write a fair and balanced appraisal? I'm sure at least ten here could, if not twelve. Im saying that all offseason you have done nothing but talk about the Royals, posted articles of theirs, forced their narrative into completely unrelated discussions, every chance you get. It is tiring telling you to stay on topic all the time. How about this, why dont you post articles from Margalus? SSS? Write Sox? I dont want to read an article that in the first paragraph refers to every other team as their underlings, mostly because I have had to hear that from you every day since the world series ended. /fin

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 10, 2016 -> 07:07 AM) They have the White Sox in fourth, which is the consensus right now. Four teams are behind the White Sox, which is a pretty realistic assessment. Where would you place them as of today? Why would they have an agenda to hype the Tigers or Indians? What in the synopsis paragraph that was written about each team is incorrect? The only obvious error was not mentioning Yu Darvish's comeback with the Rangers. They actually have Texas regressing to 9th, one spot in front of the Sox and also admit the Rays could easily fall back in the pack as well. Does Jim Margalus at SSS have the Sox higher? Going by his tone this entire offseason, it's highly doubtful. Where i place them and what Margulas thinks doesnt really matter. What do the Royals fans think, thats what matters.

royals review seems like a solid non biased source

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Feb 9, 2016 -> 04:24 PM) Thibs knew the roster would get crushed with injuries? The warning signs were there before the injuries

Jimmy Butler out 3-4 weeks yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay

QUOTE (GreenSox @ Feb 9, 2016 -> 10:51 AM) Expected by whom? I hope the Sox brass expected a bit more than a .704 OPS with bad defense for their $42 million + loss of draft choice investment. The offense should be okay They didn't want to spend on more elite hitters, so go on the cheap and fix the defense. Sign Jackson or the like. To contend anyway, they need to fix the outfield defense and get more out of pitchers 3-5. You think they need to get more out of the 3rd pitcher? Im really not concerned about Rodon/Quintanas production

I think even if my wife loved me and cared for me, if she didnt have the sex drive at all and wasnt interested in me anymore that would destroy our marriage. I wouldnt want an open marriage because I would carry that guilt with me, I would rather end the marriage. Thats just my opinion though

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Feb 9, 2016 -> 11:44 AM) These flu bugs that run through households are ruthless. Something I never experienced until I had kids. Friday the 3-year old pukes up her entire breakfast. Saturday night my wife couldn't even keep water down. Sunday the 5-month old finishes a bottle of milk and immediately pukes the entire thing up. Last night it was my turn to spend the night in misery in the bathroom. Luckily the kids didn't get it that bad, but it's crazy how it just goes from person to person, day by day. our house has a head/chest cold. Not pleasant

Jesus Christ, caulfield I can't even

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Feb 9, 2016 -> 09:45 AM) So that Zawaski piece had the wrong numbers in it: http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/02/08/zaw...wks-jets-trade/ That outlines how getting Ladd is completely feasible. You should tweet that to him and see what he says. Zawaski is pretty good about hockey discussion and will admit when he is wrong and correct himself

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 9, 2016 -> 06:54 AM) So every actor and actress that has worked with Woody Allen should be boycotted in your opinion? Where does political correctness begin and end? If the comparison was Bill Clinton, am I implicitly calling, let's say Marco Rubio, a rapist and womanizer if they have some of the same political traits and I had compared Rubio to Obama and Clinton? what the f*** are you talking about? You said Sanders was a cross between Larry David and woody allen, I agree with the first one and disagree with the second one. I didnt say anything about boycotting everyone that has worked with Woody Allen, i said WOODY ALLEN IS A WHINY ACCUSED CHILD RAPIST.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 08:31 PM) I don't think anyone's supporting Sanders because of his eloquence (he's like a cross between Larry David and Woody Allen but taller), his style or appearance, it's almost 100% what he represents or symbolizes or a protest against the establishment. Now on those occasions like Nixon and JFK in 1960, it might have been a small factor, but less so than the Kennedy machine greasing Chicago. And, in another way, it's going to be turned against Rubio now...that he's just another more packaged, less intellectual version of Obama without the ability to do well in retail politics outside of his own bubble of advisors. The further irony here is he was taken down a peg or two by a candidate some have argued was unelectable due to his weight issues in Christie. A whiny accused child rapist. Nice

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 11:42 PM) It's crazy cause it felt like Paxson was never afraid to pull the trigger when he was GM. Gar wants his guys to succeed

http://wxrt.cbslocal.com/2016/02/08/listen...-spirit-vocals/

Your 2015/2016 Chicago Bulls: this is a championship roster, so why bother watching?

are either of them heros?

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 03:42 PM) haha I didn't mean to capitalize the O. I figured, im just joking too.

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 02:22 PM) NO they didn't. They paid DL Mike Daniels. Mike Neal is an OLB that Bears had interest in last season. My bad, you are right. no need to yell

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 02:00 PM) Jack and Trevathan both would play Jack LB spot under Fangio. I honestly hope the Bears can take Jaylon Smith at 11. He's reportedly going to be back in season and if so would be excellent pick at #11. I think the Bears will trade Bennett and end up with 10-11 draft picks. Some free agents to possibly target: LB Danny Trevathan, DL Malik Jackson, OLB Mike Neal, CB Leonard Johnson, OL Brandon Brooks. I think they get one of the free agent TE's as well: Dwayne Allen or LaDarius Green. Packers paid him

QUOTE (bmags @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 11:01 AM) Do we think Jackson might move off of this "triangle offense" kick finally? What he did to Fisher was brutal. Made him install the triangle with zero players that fit the system(not to mention it is antiquated), gave him absolute s*** rosters which were further gutted, and then fired him QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 11:22 AM) Is it really Fish's fault the Knicks have no talent? Or has he also proven he's a lousy coach? how could one even tell if he is a lousy coach

btw, the 2011 draft was RIDICULOUS. The top 10 alone is amazing

QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Feb 8, 2016 -> 01:25 AM) I seriously want to know what was going through Eli's head in that gif. nobody wants to know what Eli is thinking when he is making Eli face

Well I was wrong about this