Dick Allen

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Sep 11, 2007 -> 08:23 AM) Ya well you openly said here that you were rooting against him before he even threw a single pitch for this team. You never gave him a chance. He's shown he has a solid fastball(91-93 is perfectly fine when you can move it a bit like he can), he has a good curveball yet an inconsistant one and while he rarely uses his changeup, he has flashed one from time to time just to show teams he has one. IF(and it's still a big if) he can gain some consistancy in his curve, he can be at least a league average starter for this club imo. That would be absolutely huge because it does indeed give us more options in the offseason. It would be very foolish to make Floyd part of 2008's rotation based on a few September starts, totalling ignoring what has gone on before, not just this year but the 3 previous seasons as well. He's not very good. Its funny that Floyd's fastball is solid when he's 91-93, but if Contreras throws 91-93 he's washed up. Like Contreras, he must keep people off base because they run at will off of him. I'm not buying his success.

QUOTE(3E8 @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 11:05 PM) Since Coop changed his windup Gavin has 4 quality starts out of 5 I love September evaluations.

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 10:55 PM) Signing Eckstein is nothing more than an "anything but Uribe" scenario. It gives our fans the illusion improvements have been made. We really have no choice but to play Richar and Fields. They're going to allow the White Sox possible financial wiggle room to sign their next batch of grinders. I mean, not every player can be like Asdrubal Cabrera and produce immediately upon promotion. Cmon, now. Everyone knows it's rare for any player to succeed within three years of first playing in the majors. The White Sox used to have guys who had success when they were promoted. Thomas, Lee, Ordonez, even Crede was on fire in 2002. Mike Caruso hit .300 has a rookie didn't he? In fact, Slappy's OPS was only .009 lower than Josh Fields. If Richar did that, we would be hearing he's a future HOFer and what a genius KW is for acquiring him. I don't think I've ever seen so many people so impressed with so little shown. Maybe he'll be good some day, but right now he is not a major league calibur player.

I don't know about a painter, but he's going to have to be a magician to make this roster championship quality without significantly raising the payroll. The word is ticket prices for this last place team will rise between $1-3. We used to laugh at the Cubs for doing that, and laughed even harder at their fans for paying it. I think Garland is gone, but I just don't see how there will be room for a huge free agent. Gavin Floyd is not a quality starter. Danks ran out of gas after about 90 innings. Contreras is a big question mark. Vazquez as a #2 is a question mark. Buerhle is solid. The bullpen is an absolute mess. I think you're right about painted in a corner here. Some of these contracts cannot be moved. Unfortunately reality isn't setting in in the front office on 35th St. This team is currently worse than almost every other team in baseball,

QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 09:17 PM) It gets me scared to death about our offseason. I don't know how the Sox OBP problem would be solved with Eckstein, Richar, and Fields in the line-up. They need to get guys who can get on base, and who can catch and throw the ball. Eckstein is going to be paid a lot more than he's worth.

QUOTE(BearSox @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 10:31 PM) I could see a rotation of Buehrle-Vazquez-Danks-Floyd-Egbert. However, if that's the case, I think it is automatic that you have a 7 man rotation and one of Broadway, Haeger, Massett, or even Phillips in the pen. Danks is 0-7 with a 6.80 ERA his last 8 starts and he's the #3? Gavin Floyd is a #4? A rookie #5? Has everyone just dismissed what these guys have done this season?You better have a ton of relievers who can throw a ton of innings and an offense that can lead the league in runs scored if you want to be anywhere near .500. The pitching staff is scary.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 09:31 PM) With a handful of arms that we aren't quite sure about, I think my plan for the offseason has changed a bit. I now want both Garland and Contreras traded, and two of Floyd/Haeger/Egbert/Gonzalez to take over the fourth and fifth spots. I understand the potential for disaster is there, especially since you're moving an above average #5 starter in Danks into a spot where he becomes below average (#3), but the 2008 season is going to be a gamble anyways. Trade Garland and Contreras for a combination of your 2008 SS and prospects, sign one of those CFers (Bradley, Jones, Cameron, Rowand/Hunter in that order), let Crede take third, put Fields in left and hope to hell that you can mash the crap out of teams (and that your bullpen bounces back big time). The White Sox would be in the hunt for the #1 pick again with that rotation. Danks as a #3 is scary. He couldn't finish out this season. Floyd blows. The others would be rookies who most likely struggle. That's 3 out of 5 that are below average and really counting on Vazquez as a #2 guy would be very scary. Pitching wins. I really don't think you can say without a doubt Danks is an above average #5 starter. Making him #3 isn't potential disaster, its pretty close to guaranteed disaster.

I still think they will be handcuffed by the guaranteed money they already have out there. Garland won't bring back nearly what most think if he's traded. Ozzie has already started the "there aren't going to be many relievers available and we have guys under contract" line. So I think a lot more of this team will be back than should be back. Another year like 2007 in 2008 would be devastating.

QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Sep 10, 2007 -> 12:32 PM) No matter how many times you post that they should, they are not going to rebuild in 2008. Wouldn't it be better to wait it out and see what they do and what they can accomplish. Baseball works funny sometimes. Look at Detroit, not to pick on them specifically but many people were saying they will have a dynasty due to their pitching. Bonderman is on his way to see an elbow doctor today. Don't believe all the articles is all I can say. And don't believe JR, KW or OG. They thought they had a title contender this season and may wind up with the worst record in baseball.

QUOTE(The Critic @ Sep 9, 2007 -> 10:05 AM) I saw Rush last night - here are my three highlights and three lowlights: Highlight #3 - Their sound system is wonderful. Crystal clear enough to hear every slight detail, yet very loud. Highlight #2 - Geddy Lee, much to my surprise, hit almost every high note. I know this wouldn't be a highlight to many people, but I like to hear the songs the way I remember them, and he was able to pull it off. Highlight #1 - Neil Peart. The man is an amazing musician. I don't normally consider drummers "true musicians", but Peart is one in my opinion. Fantastic. Lowlight #3 - WAAAAAAAY too much of the new CD. Snakes And Arrows is nowhere near any of their better work to me. Lowlight #2 - Kind of related to #3, their set lists (two sets) were aimed too much at the Rushtards and not enough toward the people who came to hear the more familiar Rush songs. Simply said, not enough hits. Maybe 6 or 7 familiar songs in a 3-hour show. Terrible ratio. PLUS, two of the three encores were new songs - that's just idiotic. Lowlight #1 - They were just DULL. Excellent musicianship, songs sounded tight and professional, but it just didn't make me want to do anything. All in all, this show was a disappointment. This was the third time I've seen Rush and this was far and away the least impressive of the three. I've seen them 50 times or more and I thought last night was the best they've been. When you have as much material as they do, some are always going to have a problem with the setlist, even rushtards which I suppose I would qualify. Their last 2 tours, the setlists were virtually identical, so I was happy to hear the new one. Entre Nous, Circumstances, Freewill, Natural Science were great. Spirit of Radio, Tom Sawyer and Subdivisions, Limelight will show up on every tour. I'd have liked 2112 to make the cut, but its about a 3 hour show as it is. I really like the new album and they really seem to enjoy playing it. They do play 9 songs from it, so if you don't like it or aren't very familiar with it, this show is probably one you would like to skip. I didn't find them dull at all. I was upfront so maybe I was able to see more I'm not sure, but to be honest, there's probably no way I could ever be bored at a Rush show even if they truly were dull. The encore was One Little Victory from Vapor Trails, actually played during the Connie's pizza race once at USCF in 2006, and Passage to Bangkok and YYZ. Bangkok is 30 years old and YYZ is on Moving Pictures which was released in 1981.

QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 5, 2007 -> 07:44 AM) um... no. 2004: Sox payroll $51M, second to Minny's $55M, and CLE and DET were both around $49M, so they were pretty much on par with the Sox as well. The only team the Sox were way ahead of in payroll was KC. Also, in 2005, the Sox were first but DET was only about $5M below them. The gap wasn't significant until 2006, and even this year, DET is within $12M. So let's not make it seem like Ozzie has been constantly given the ALC title giftwrapped. According to baseball-almanac.com the White Sox payroll in 2004 was $76 million, significantly higher than anyone in the division. Anyone who says Boston and the Yankees have an advantage because of payroll should think the White Sox have the same advantage in their division. Also if the $5 million or $6 million in 2005 is not significant why was there all the fuss about the CLee trade how it allowed the White Sox to sign a few guys that totaled around $5 million or $6 million like Iguchi and AJ? And if its not so significant, why are people wanting Joe Crede to be non-tendered? He would cost $5.5 million tops.

If you use Ozzie's overall record as reason he deserves an extension, you must have been up in arms when Jerry Manuel was shown the door. His teams were pretty good, he won a division. He had a winning record. He never had the highest payroll in the division, Ozzie never has not had the highest payroll in the division. I just don't know why you have to extend him now. He has a contract for next season and an option for 2009. I wonder if its because Marriotti wrote he needed to be fired. It seems the White Sox pay a lot of attention to what's in print and on the airwaves. Maybe Sox fans should put some money together and pay Marriotti to write a column on how the Sox should build a team around Erstad and Pods and Gonzalez. They would be gone in a day.

The White Sox actually drafted Polanco about 5 rounds after they drafted Schueler's daughter.

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Sep 4, 2007 -> 05:37 PM) Let's start stockpiling 62nd round picks! Carrie Schueler was long gone by the 62nd round.

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Sep 4, 2007 -> 04:26 PM) Bonds was drafted 6th overall :D And the White Sox had the 5th pick. I can understand why some here want the Sox to lose, but I still want victories. This draft pick probably won't be able to really help for a least a couple of years, maybe more. Another month of constant losing is another month where the core of the team is going to forget how to win. Losing breeds more losing.

QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 11:26 PM) Berghoff brewed in Monroe, Wisconsin. You used to be able to buy it as Huber beer, about $8 a case. Of course you had to pay a deposit on bottles. They threw a Berghoff label on it and jacked up the price.

QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Sep 3, 2007 -> 09:05 PM) I'm not going to try to find the link, but Jim Callis said the CWS would likely be his pick for worst farm system. Houston is the Sox main competition. The Reds (Bailey, Votto) and Pirates (McCutchen and Lincoln) both are better from what I've read... I read that too, but who really knows? It wasn't long ago everyone said the Sox had the best, and that was far from accurate. I just hope there are more surprises than busts. The Sox are very thin in position prospects. They have had the philosophy of drafting pitchers because that is what is most valuable, thinking if they develop they can always trade them for something else.

QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Sep 3, 2007 -> 09:00 PM) I'm going to go ahead an agree with that. Why do people want to drop Thome? It makes no sense for a number of reasons: 1) He's the best hitter on the team, the only one with OBP skills. 2) He's not that expensive and is a relatively short term commitment. 3) He has a no trade clause 4) If you want more speed from the DH slot...well, whatever. If "plodders" are a concern Crede and Konerko are the ones you should look at. 5) If you want to trade a bat, Konerko is the one. LAA and BALT probably still like him and his contract is more onerous than Thome's. Plus it should be easier to come close to replacing Konerko's production. You can argue the Sox should semi-platoon Thome against LHP and I'd agree... Thome got blasted last season for only hitting 42 homers, driving in 109, hitting .288 having a .416 OBP and 1.014 OPS. So this season he will be considered worthless. People want to replace him with someone who does about half of what he does, but someone who can play a position for those 9 away games at NL parks, obviously not realizing that will misplace one of the other regular players.

I fail to see where Broadway's performance at Charlotte merits a call-up. Another $50k+ wasted by the White Sox. Unless its in his contract he must be called up so he can walk people all night long.

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Sep 2, 2007 -> 12:53 PM) If Contreras can go 6+, no ER today, that should be much more important than the L. I guess the best case scenario right now would Count going 7IP, no ER, and the Bukvich and Myers exploding at the end, losing the ballgame. If you are talking about his trade worth, I really don't think a few September starts will make much of a difference even if he is lights out. For the White Sox to trade him, they will have to eat a lot of his contract IMO. They are better off keeping him if thats the case and he shows anything. He has been better as of late although not dominant. If he can get back to a middle of the rotation guy, not even a #1 or #2, he will be worth more next offseason and you will get a season of decent pitching.

I wonder if any team had ever had 6 hits with no one out in the second inning and hadn't scored.

QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 08:09 PM) Fields underachieves? He's been the brightest spot, along with Jenks, the second half of this season. Its pretty sad isn't it when a guy who is hitting below .230 in the second half with an OPB of about .275 and more than 1 strikeout every 3 ABs can be considered a bright spot.

QUOTE(3E8 @ Aug 29, 2007 -> 10:53 PM) Did you really have that in mind when you said you didn't understand why people thought Anderson was crap and then a few posts later go on to say you don't like Richar even though he's putting up better (yet still bad) numbers through equal ABs? Guys who play at the collegiate level on average make it to the show with much fewer minor league ABs than guys who don't. Anderson/Richar were/are the same age as rookies. Yeah, but Anderson has to get used to wood bats and his minor league seasons were cut short due to injury. Richar still had more AB even if you throw in BA's college numbers. I haven't ripped Richar BTW, I just said I wasn't high on him and and frankly shocked by all the love a guy with his numbers gets. That's all.

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Aug 29, 2007 -> 10:47 PM) Not that you are wrong about this, but are you EVER wrong? Just wondering. I'm wrong a lot. I'm also right a few times. Just like everyone else. What's the point, I'm not allowed to give an opinion?

QUOTE(3E8 @ Aug 29, 2007 -> 10:42 PM) And you were optimistic about Anderson? Do you remember his line through 85 ABs? Yes, but Anderson had quite a few less minor league ABs than Richar.