nickofypres

QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 20, 2013 -> 10:25 PM) It's good to see his power developing a bit (he hit nothing but singles last year for Detroit). The patience will need to improve, but it won't matter as much if he can be a .300 hitter. Very true.

QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 20, 2013 -> 11:33 PM) This is his worst season since his rookie year. His dad fell off a cliff at 32. QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ Aug 21, 2013 -> 12:02 AM) A really short, fat 30. Both very good points.

Thanks, man.

Not to sound like a total n00b here, but what is the diff between fWAR and bWAR and when should they be applied, and to whom? Sorry if its been answered already, I'm too lazy to read through this mess.

Garica needs to walk more. Plus its too small of a sample size.

QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 20, 2013 -> 05:04 PM) Yes he has. Fielder is only 30 though. I can't imagine his decline is happening already.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Aug 16, 2013 -> 10:25 AM) You really need to use TWTW+ to account for league and park factors.

*Addison Reed

Konerko just knows how to win.

I would think they would maybe for Jose Abreu? Slugging first baseman.

QUOTE (ron883 @ Aug 11, 2013 -> 11:05 PM) A white sox season without Hawk, however that may occur. Are there rumours he may retire?

If the Mets decide to part ways with Ike Davis, he would be my first choice to stick at first.

I'm glad that I live in the Midwest, yet are getting LA-TB and not, you know, the two midwestern teams game.

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?con...05&sid=t494 Garica HR for Charlotte.

0-2 this week at games.

I'm sure this has been beaten to death, but I still don't really care for Avisail Garcia.

Yeah...last nights game was s***ty to see in person.

I'm a Danks guy, but if you can dump a somewhat decent sized contract when you're rebuilding, you do it.

Any chance the Rangers would be in on Dunn?

QUOTE (DirtySox @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 12:30 AM) Because they will need a SS? Oh, he plays third. I thought for sure he played short. My bad.

So, why would Detroit trade for Iglasias, instead of promoting Castellanos?

In theory: with the money they saved with the Peavy deal, the Sox can now eat money in a Rios, and Ramirez, trade right?

Go get yo boy back, Towers.

Isn't the Sox saying they're good to "hold onto" Peavy similar to the Cubs talking about extending Garza before he was dealt? Just trying to up the ante?

Why didn't they just replace the Cubs guy with the Gonzo's Sox replacement?