PaleAleSox Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 9 minutes ago, The Beast said: Those who live in Illinois in the thread, will a move to Hammond or Gary increase the time it takes to go to a Bears game? Would it bother you if they played in Indiana? Would you be concerned about the loss of tax revenue? I assume a lot of people in the south burbs would love them to move to Hammond. I'm in the west burbs so it would be a pain for me but I don't attend games. Not a huge fan of watching football in person. So much better on TV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 14 minutes ago, The Beast said: Those who live in Illinois in the thread, will a move to Hammond or Gary increase the time it takes to go to a Bears game? Would it bother you if they played in Indiana? Would you be concerned about the loss of tax revenue? For me? I feel like it might be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 55 minutes ago, tray said: The question for Mr. Ishbia and the other Sox investors is whether the so-called "78" neighborhood in the so-called "South Loop", makes any sense considering many factors including the risk in moving away from the WSox historic home into a depressed, isolated dead zone. Lmao youre calling the south loop a despressed dead zone vs their current location, sandwiched between a super highway, rail yard, public housing and seas of parking lots. I cant think of anything more depressing than their current location. Maybe if they moved to O block.. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 17 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said: I assume a lot of people in the south burbs would love them to move to Hammond. I'm in the west burbs so it would be a pain for me but I don't attend games. Not a huge fan of watching football in person. So much better on TV. 13 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: For me? I feel like it might be better. What should the Illinois General Assembly and Governor offer them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyPowers Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 51 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: The White Sox have one of the smallest fanbases in MLB after 125 years in so-called "Bridgeport", which is more depressed and isolated than the South Loop. I am not sure why you 100% ignore the current condition of the fanbase in relation to where the park is now. Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 2 minutes ago, KennyPowers said: Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. At best, an extreme bandwagon fanbase. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago On 1/3/2026 at 6:45 PM, WhiteSox2023 said: I lose interest in this thread when @tray doesn’t post. Did your interest level go back up? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 56 minutes ago, KennyPowers said: Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. It does not necessarily mean that. In this case, however, I think both happen to be true. If not "small", at the very least, it's a shrinking fanbase. The incoming owner is going to have to figure out something to change the trajectory of this team's market share. Sure, winning absolutely MUST be part of that, but unless they can rattle off a bunch of pennants in quick succession, they'll still be struggling to make themselves relevant in a city were the Cubs are as dominant as ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyPowers Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 20 minutes ago, 77 Hitmen said: It does not necessarily mean that. In this case, however, I think both happen to be true. If not "small", at the very least, it's a shrinking fanbase. The incoming owner is going to have to figure out something to change the trajectory of this team's market share. Sure, winning absolutely MUST be part of that, but unless they can rattle off a bunch of pennants in quick succession, they'll still be struggling to make themselves relevant in a city were the Cubs are as dominant as ever. The fanbase is fine. https://bolavip.com/en/mlb/Top-25-MLB-teams-with-most-fans-20200528-0001.html https://capitolcitynow.com/news/248842-white-sox-are-big-winners-on-illinois-roads/ A ballpark at the 78 changes the trajectory. Ishbia knows this franchise is a sleeping giant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Gov. JB Pritzker and legislative leaders in Springfield have signaled a willingness to chip in on infrastructure, but they’ve urged the team to identify a mechanism to pay off more than half a billion dollars still owed on Soldier Field’s 2003 renovation as a condition to getting any legislative help. “Building a stadium is, from my perspective, about doing what’s best for the taxpayers,” Pritzker said Tuesday. “This is a private business. We help private businesses all the time in the state, and I want to help if it’s with infrastructure, as we do with other private businesses — that’s absolutely a way we could do that. But as I’ve said, and the Bears have heard this, that we’re not going to build a stadium for the Chicago Bears.” https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears-stadium/2026/01/13/bears-survey-season-ticket-holders-northwest-indiana-stadium-arlington-heights Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted 55 minutes ago Share Posted 55 minutes ago 39 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said: Gov. JB Pritzker and legislative leaders in Springfield have signaled a willingness to chip in on infrastructure, but they’ve urged the team to identify a mechanism to pay off more than half a billion dollars still owed on Soldier Field’s 2003 renovation as a condition to getting any legislative help. “Building a stadium is, from my perspective, about doing what’s best for the taxpayers,” Pritzker said Tuesday. “This is a private business. We help private businesses all the time in the state, and I want to help if it’s with infrastructure, as we do with other private businesses — that’s absolutely a way we could do that. But as I’ve said, and the Bears have heard this, that we’re not going to build a stadium for the Chicago Bears.” https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears-stadium/2026/01/13/bears-survey-season-ticket-holders-northwest-indiana-stadium-arlington-heights The Bears are not asking the State of Illinois to build them a stadium. The Bears are going to build and pay for the stadium. They want money for the infrastructure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 43 minutes ago Share Posted 43 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, WBWSF said: The Bears are not asking the State of Illinois to build them a stadium. The Bears are going to build and pay for the stadium. They want money for the infrastructure. The Bears may be asking for conditions which haven't been made public yet to which the politicians are refusing to allow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.