PaleAleSox Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, The Beast said: Those who live in Illinois in the thread, will a move to Hammond or Gary increase the time it takes to go to a Bears game? Would it bother you if they played in Indiana? Would you be concerned about the loss of tax revenue? I assume a lot of people in the south burbs would love them to move to Hammond. I'm in the west burbs so it would be a pain for me but I don't attend games. Not a huge fan of watching football in person. So much better on TV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, The Beast said: Those who live in Illinois in the thread, will a move to Hammond or Gary increase the time it takes to go to a Bears game? Would it bother you if they played in Indiana? Would you be concerned about the loss of tax revenue? For me? I feel like it might be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 55 minutes ago, tray said: The question for Mr. Ishbia and the other Sox investors is whether the so-called "78" neighborhood in the so-called "South Loop", makes any sense considering many factors including the risk in moving away from the WSox historic home into a depressed, isolated dead zone. Lmao youre calling the south loop a despressed dead zone vs their current location, sandwiched between a super highway, rail yard, public housing and seas of parking lots. I cant think of anything more depressing than their current location. Maybe if they moved to O block.. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said: I assume a lot of people in the south burbs would love them to move to Hammond. I'm in the west burbs so it would be a pain for me but I don't attend games. Not a huge fan of watching football in person. So much better on TV. 13 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: For me? I feel like it might be better. What should the Illinois General Assembly and Governor offer them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyPowers Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 51 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: The White Sox have one of the smallest fanbases in MLB after 125 years in so-called "Bridgeport", which is more depressed and isolated than the South Loop. I am not sure why you 100% ignore the current condition of the fanbase in relation to where the park is now. Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, KennyPowers said: Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. At best, an extreme bandwagon fanbase. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 23 minutes ago Share Posted 23 minutes ago On 1/3/2026 at 6:45 PM, WhiteSox2023 said: I lose interest in this thread when @tray doesn’t post. Did your interest level go back up? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 14 minutes ago Share Posted 14 minutes ago 56 minutes ago, KennyPowers said: Low attendance does not mean small fanbase. It does not necessarily mean that. In this case, however, I think both happen to be true. If not "small", at the very least, it's a shrinking fanbase. The incoming owner is going to have to figure out something to change the trajectory of this team's market share. Sure, winning absolutely MUST be part of that, but unless they can rattle off a bunch of pennants in quick succession, they'll still be struggling to make themselves relevant in a city were the Cubs are as dominant as ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.