14 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Does roch have a single tool better than Bobby?

His name.

Maybe the wrong audience, but is no one concerned that he's literally gotten worse YoY? And im not just talking about counting stats and babip luck.

Walk rate is down. ISO is down. K rate is up.

People keep posting big ten game results with ooo's and ahhh's. He's playing the big ten vs future accountants, he should mash. The concerning thing is he's mashing less.

The last thing you want to draft is a maxed out player.

3 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Maybe the wrong audience, but is no one concerned that he's literally gotten worse YoY? And im not just talking about counting stats and babip luck.

Walk rate is down. ISO is down. K rate is up.

People keep posting big ten game results with ooo's and ahhh's. He's playing the big ten vs future accountants, he should mash. The concerning thing is he's mashing less.

The last thing you want to draft is a maxed out player.

Someone on The Score the other day (Callis maybe?) said that Emerson is better now than when Roch was his age. Said if you went tool to tool, Emerson is faster but Roch is better defensively. I also like that he hits left-handed. Idk, I don't think I would be disappointed if they took either honestly.

34 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Maybe the wrong audience, but is no one concerned that he's literally gotten worse YoY? And im not just talking about counting stats and babip luck.

Walk rate is down. ISO is down. K rate is up.

People keep posting big ten game results with ooo's and ahhh's. He's playing the big ten vs future accountants, he should mash. The concerning thing is he's mashing less.

The last thing you want to draft is a maxed out player.

That's some Andrew Vaughn PTSD right there. His batting stance is also kinda similar to Vaughn's, which doesn't help.

3 minutes ago, chw42 said:

That's some Andrew Vaughn PTSD right there. His batting stance is also kinda similar to Vaughn's, which doesn't help.

The critical difference is that Vaughn is a 1B/DH and Roch has a 3 WAR floor basically as a competent big league SS.

Tork and Vaughn never really worked out. You have to HIT HIT HIT to be a valuable regular as a 1B/DH. Especially as a RHB.

To me this is just a no brainer. You take the guy that has a guaranteed floor as a solid regular. We don't need a HR, we need a solid base hit here.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by chitownsportsfan

2 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said:

The critical difference is that Vaughn is a 1B/DH and Roch has a 3 WAR floor basically as a competent big league SS.

Tork and Vaughn never really worked out. You have to HIT HIT HIT to be a valuable regular as a 1B/DH. Especially as a RHB.

To me this is just a no brainer. You take the guy that has a guaranteed floor as a solid regular. We don't need a HR, we need a solid base hit here.

I'm not saying they're that alike other than the fact they're both college hitters who destroyed college pitching. The fact that their hitting mechanics look kind of similar just gives me some PTSD. Roch is a much better athlete relative to other SS than Vaughn is at 1B. So I doubt we see Roch hit the physical wall that ended up dooming Vaughn.

Roch is 100% the safer pick with the highest floor. You don't see a lot of 65 FV prospects coming out of college. I don't really think the Sox should overthink it. We tend to get prospect fatigue with guys who are locked in as the #1 pick early like Roch and Caleb Williams. But they got that hype because they are special.

1 hour ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Someone on The Score the other day (Callis maybe?) said that Emerson is better now than when Roch was his age. Said if you went tool to tool, Emerson is faster but Roch is better defensively. I also like that he hits left-handed. Idk, I don't think I would be disappointed if they took either honestly.

Roch is closer to the big leagues than Emerson. If Emerson was a college player, this might be a much different conversation. I’m not sure if the Sox should be drafting #1 based on the floor of the player, and age fit with the current team.

Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by Chick Mercedes

1 hour ago, chw42 said:

I'm not saying they're that alike other than the fact they're both college hitters who destroyed college pitching. The fact that their hitting mechanics look kind of similar just gives me some PTSD. Roch is a much better athlete relative to other SS than Vaughn is at 1B. So I doubt we see Roch hit the physical wall that ended up dooming Vaughn.

Roch is 100% the safer pick with the highest floor. You don't see a lot of 65 FV prospects coming out of college. I don't really think the Sox should overthink it. We tend to get prospect fatigue with guys who are locked in as the #1 pick early like Roch and Caleb Williams. But they got that hype because they are special.

I think Vaughn being moved to LF wasn't the greatest idea, also he didn't really spend much time at all in the minors (55g) with a horrible ground ball:fly ball rate

couple that with the fact that the former regime didn't have anyone in place that could actually develop hitting in the whole org

a lot of hitterish college guys get to pro (milb) ball and don't hit right away, Vaughn wasn't the first.

imo nitpicking roch's stats YoY is just that, nit picking, they're almost identical.

if they go with Emerson, I would be surprised

fan graphs has their draft list up and Roch's numbers stand out so far above all the other college hitters, they don't have anything listed for Emerson right now as far as stats

2 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Someone on The Score the other day (Callis maybe?) said that Emerson is better now than when Roch was his age. Said if you went tool to tool, Emerson is faster but Roch is better defensively. I also like that he hits left-handed. Idk, I don't think I would be disappointed if they took either honestly.

This is gonna suck fretting over. I wish there was simply no doubt who the guy to take at #1 is.

Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by WhiteSox2023

2 hours ago, chw42 said:

That's some Andrew Vaughn PTSD right there. His batting stance is also kinda similar to Vaughn's, which doesn't help.

I will go to my grave with if Andrew Vaughn doesn't skip the minors and go to LF immediately, he ends up a completely different player.

6 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

I will go to my grave with if Andrew Vaughn doesn't skip the minors and go to LF immediately, he ends up a completely different player.

Looking back at that move, it looks even more pathetic now. The Sox were so cheap, they took an unfinished draft pick that was an obvious 1B at best and called him up to play the outfield, where he had no hope of being good defensively.