Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trade Ideas/Rumors/Proposals Thread

Featured Replies

7 hours ago, chw42 said:

Torens is amazing defensively. But I don't think he'd fix our hitting issues at the position.

Very positive CERA too.

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Views 62.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Hard pass

  • Chicago White Sox
    Chicago White Sox

    We have no excuse not to buy a top-end SP in free agency this offseason. As such, I’d rather keep Bonemer and go with a cheaper SP at the deadline. I truly believe we should not be doing “all-in” trad

  • Chicago White Sox
    Chicago White Sox

    Trevor Bauer is an awful clubhouse fit even if you believe him innocent of any criminal wrongdoing. I also don’t understand why anyone would think a 35 year old pitching in the Nippon League or where

Posted Images

It’s still amazing that this team had two top catcher prospects and two additional catchers with decently hyped prospect status at one time in Lee and Romo and now the team needs a catcher.

I know the D'Backs are right in the WC Race, but curious if James McCann could probably be acquired at a pretty low cost. Spend real capital on pitching, but McCann wouldn't be a terrible rental.

I haven't done a deep dive but not sure why more people aren't in on Brady Singer. Since June 1, he's started 9 games, 52.1 innings, 17 earned runs (2.92), k/walk 52/16.

Guy will cost very little and offers good upside imo. Could package him and Stephenson and probably not have to give up anyone in the top 10 (post-draft). Would still leave plenty for another pitcher or two.

31 minutes ago, Rusty_Kuntz said:

I haven't done a deep dive but not sure why more people aren't in on Brady Singer. Since June 1, he's started 9 games, 52.1 innings, 17 earned runs (2.92), k/walk 52/16.

Guy will cost very little and offers good upside imo. Could package him and Stephenson and probably not have to give up anyone in the top 10 (post-draft). Would still leave plenty for another pitcher or two.

Yeah I saw he struggled a bit in the beginning due to trying to pitch with a blister.

We are officially one week out from the trade deadline. The Sox themselves will be busy with seven straight games against the Yankees & Rays and that’s with no off days. Short of a massive blow-up this coming week, I think the motions are already in order for Getz to be an aggressive buyer.

Two items of interest here. First, there is a roster move coming today and it will be Hays or Pereira replacing Junior Perez as RH hitting outfielder. Hays is on the 60 Day IL so if it’s him getting the call, then he’ll push our 40 man roster to the full amount. If it’s Pereira, we won’t run into that situation just yet. Either way, we can’t keep both of them and Grichuk, meaning one of them will be let go in some form over the next week.

Second, the trade for Urquidy also had a roster implication. While I fully expect him to be just AAA depth as we shift McDougal & Hagen to relief roles to end the season, it does add to the roster crunch. Drew Thorpe is the one guy on the 60 Day IL who looks like they will need to come off before season end. It’s also possible that Hagen, Mason Adams, or even Pallette will need to get added. The real crunch will come this offseason, but I’d expect some fat to be trimmed at the deadline.

2 hours ago, Rusty_Kuntz said:

I haven't done a deep dive but not sure why more people aren't in on Brady Singer. Since June 1, he's started 9 games, 52.1 innings, 17 earned runs (2.92), k/walk 52/16.

Guy will cost very little and offers good upside imo. Could package him and Stephenson and probably not have to give up anyone in the top 10 (post-draft). Would still leave plenty for another pitcher or two.

Would be very supportive of this move.

14 minutes ago, Chisoxfn said:

Would be very supportive of this move.

But I hate his face

1 week to go. Should be a fun ride. Let's hope the Sox play well vs Yanks and Rays in the meantime.

2 hours ago, Bonemer, I Hardly Know Her said:

But I hate his face

Golly, I remember the days of having my battery powered AM radio next to my pillow listening to Sox games. No faces. The best. Even now, something soothing about baseball in the background on the radio or headphones instead of TV

I just looked at the foul territory page. Yeah, I don’t buy them knowing anything lol

Edited by Chick Mercedes

Hard pass on astronomical asking price

Cubs are moving on from Taillon without a ton of depth behind him, though perhaps that’s a moot point with the trade deadline now just a week away. Due to their injuries, it has been long suspected that the Cubs would add some starting pitching this summer. They already made the aforementioned Peterson and Civale deals but will presumably make some even more impactful acquisitions before the clock strikes 5pm Central on August 3.

mlbtraderumors.com

Reid Detmers is the best pitcher that seems to be available and realistic.  He’s not an ace, but he’s certainly been a top 10-15 pitcher this season (Forget the overrated like Alcantra or Webb).  It’s his first really good year; maybe working with renown pitching coach Mike Maddux has made a difference.  I also don’t like the idea of doing business with Mozeliak. 

But there is still no way I’m trading Bonemer, Carlson or Fauske.  I’m also hesitant in trading Wolkow, Davis or B.  Smith.  We didn’t get a prospect ranked as high as Bonemer or Carlson for Crochet. 
Who I want to trade are Thorpe and Bergolla.  Sandlin or Adams or H. Smith.  And then a 10-15 guy?

16 minutes ago, Chick Mercedes said:

Hard pass on astronomical asking price

I don't think many cost controlled guys get moved. I think most of the White Sox acquisitions will be rentals.

This might mean about the same if I just posted these sentences, but here we are...

I suggested this one a while back, so I'll give it another go.

Hicks to Seattle for Luis Castillo.
I'll amend it: Hicks + Jackson for Castillo +$ ($10-$20 mill depending on vesting clause).

Hicks has been great for a month. But we don't use him in leverage; heck we use Richard in leverage. But not Hicks.

11 minutes ago, GreenSox said:

I suggested this one a while back, so I'll give it another go.

Hicks to Seattle for Luis Castillo.
I'll amend it: Hicks + Jackson for Castillo +$ ($10-$20 mill depending on vesting clause).

Hicks has been great for a month. But we don't use him in leverage; heck we use Richard in leverage. But not Hicks.

Hicks has started getting more leverage. He's been lights out last 30 days. No way I move him.

21 minutes ago, GreenSox said:

I suggested this one a while back, so I'll give it another go.

Hicks to Seattle for Luis Castillo.
I'll amend it: Hicks + Jackson for Castillo +$ ($10-$20 mill depending on vesting clause).

Hicks has been great for a month. But we don't use him in leverage; heck we use Richard in leverage. But not Hicks.

Castillo could help us but that contract is bad. Not sure we'd even need to send Hicks.

24 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

This might mean about the same if I just posted these sentences, but here we are...

Levine said as much today

30 minutes ago, Baron said:

I don't think many cost controlled guys get moved. I think most of the White Sox acquisitions will be rentals.

Yep, I get the impression they’re fine adding salary for this year but absolutely not for next year. I’m sure Jerry is one of the owners who doesn’t think they will play in 2027.

5 minutes ago, fathom said:

Yep, I get the impression they’re fine adding salary for this year but absolutely not for next year. I’m sure Jerry is one of the owners who doesn’t think they will play in 2027.

Agreed. Plus with the weird year next year I can imagine cost controlled players and prospect asks will be a premium.

6 minutes ago, fathom said:

Yep, I get the impression they’re fine adding salary for this year but absolutely not for next year. I’m sure Jerry is one of the owners who doesn’t think they will play in 2027.

Finally can break this one out.

Procurement when you politely request using your form agreement instead of  their professional services template from 2002 | Andy Lutes

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 2

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.