Jump to content

Sick of the negativity


hawkubes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let's fire Ozzie and let's fire KW. I'm so sick and tired of this talk. Ozzie's a great manager (yes, he makes mistakes, who doesn't) the players want to play for him. Kenny Williams has made some great moves, i'm so tired of everybody talkin smack about KW's moves. He's doing everything he can to make the white sox a winner, and that's what they're gonna do. Let's go Sox :gosox2: :gosox1: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (hawkubes @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 03:28 AM)
Let's fire Ozzie and let's fire KW. I'm so sick and tired of this talk. Ozzie's a great manager (yes, he makes mistakes, who doesn't) the players want to play for him. Kenny Williams has made some great moves, i'm so tired of everybody talkin smack about KW's moves. He's doing everything he can to make the white sox a winner, and that's what they're gonna do. Let's go Sox :gosox2: :gosox1: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro:

 

 

Sox fan with a cub fan mentality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This KW/Ozzie duo has lived off of 2005. Prior to that KW, never once made the playoffs in four years. And since then, he has only made the playoffs one year. So that's two playoff appearances in 10 years when on most years, two of the other five teams in the division are 70-win clubs. The Sox have had the highest payroll numerous years and been in the top two probably every year in the division. I have been on the fire KW/Ozzie bandwagon since 2007 and still am there.

 

Screw loyalty, baseball is a business and KW/Ozzie are not doing their jobs.

Edited by maggsmaggs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 09:43 AM)
This KW/Ozzie duo has lived off of 2005. Prior to that KW, never once made the playoffs in four years. And since then, he has only made the playoffs one year. So that's two playoff appearances in 10 years when on most years, two of the other five teams in the division are 70-win clubs. The Sox have had the highest payroll numerous years and been in the top two probably every year in the division. I have been on the fire KW/Ozzie bandwagon since 2007 and still am there.

 

Screw loyalty, baseball is a business and KW/Ozzie are not doing their jobs.

 

Yes, the Sox have had the highest or second highest payroll each year since KW took over. And yes, I'm fairly certain that the division has been home to 2 of the worst 3 teams in the AL in every year, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with Baltimore and Seattle the last half decade?

 

Oakland really hasn't been good for at least five years, either.

 

The odds would be about the same of winning the AL West, considering only four teams....albeit the Rangers and Angels look super tough now.

 

 

Yes, the Sox have had the highest or second highest payroll each year since KW took over. And yes, I'm fairly certain that the division has been home to 2 of the worst 3 teams in the AL in every year, too.

 

That's only true for 2009.

Last year it was Seattle, Balt and then KC. In 2008, Seattle, Baltimore then Detroit (KC and Oak one game better), 2007 Tampa, Baltimore and KC, and 2006, TB, KC and Baltimore.

 

 

 

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 09:43 AM)
This KW/Ozzie duo has lived off of 2005. Prior to that KW, never once made the playoffs in four years. And since then, he has only made the playoffs one year. So that's two playoff appearances in 10 years when on most years, two of the other five teams in the division are 70-win clubs. The Sox have had the highest payroll numerous years and been in the top two probably every year in the division. I have been on the fire KW/Ozzie bandwagon since 2007 and still am there.

 

Screw loyalty, baseball is a business and KW/Ozzie are not doing their jobs.

 

The flip side is that they have at least been in it pretty much every year of the Ozzie/KW team, except for 2007.

 

Plus flags fly forever. When you prove that you can win, you get well deserved leeway. People love to forget how the won 90 games in 2006 after having a pitching staff throw a whole extra month which I think is pretty impressive.

 

Plus KW has made some great trades to get this team where it is (McCarthy for Danks comes to mind right away)

 

There are issues I have (stop playing small ball Ozzie; Draft better KW) but these kinds of "FIRE EVERYONE POSTS IT'S 17 GAMES!!!!!" have me questioning if people have been through an actual baseball season before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 10:14 AM)
The flip side is that they have at least been in it pretty much every year of the Ozzie/KW team, except for 2007.

 

Plus flags fly forever. When you prove that you can win, you get well deserved leeway. People love to forget how the won 90 games in 2006 after having a pitching staff throw a whole extra month which I think is pretty impressive.

 

Plus KW has made some great trades to get this team where it is (McCarthy for Danks comes to mind right away)

 

There are issues I have (stop playing small ball Ozzie; Draft better KW) but these kinds of "FIRE EVERYONE POSTS IT'S 17 GAMES!!!!!" have me questioning if people have been through an actual baseball season before.

 

And as he said, which people seem to ignore each time, is that this isn't a reaction to the most recent play of the team. He and I (and quite a lot of people) have wanted a change for a long time. The recent play is just additional reasoning to want it. We can say this all year (we have done so for the last few seasons) and when it happens again next year, somebody like you will AGAIN say, "you're just overreacting to a small sample size!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care if we are 5 or 6 games out of 1st place this early in the season. What matters is where we are at at the EMD of the season. This is a good ballclub and similar to some past winning seasons they can turn it around and be a winner. It is hard to accept losing, but I know we will suffer through rough spots during a season. We can turn it around and will. Go Sox! Sis boom bah rah rah, etc, etc. Lighten up folks.

Edited by elrockinMT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 10:14 AM)
The flip side is that they have at least been in it pretty much every year of the Ozzie/KW team, except for 2007.

 

Plus flags fly forever. When you prove that you can win, you get well deserved leeway. People love to forget how the won 90 games in 2006 after having a pitching staff throw a whole extra month which I think is pretty impressive.

 

Plus KW has made some great trades to get this team where it is (McCarthy for Danks comes to mind right away)

 

There are issues I have (stop playing small ball Ozzie; Draft better KW) but these kinds of "FIRE EVERYONE POSTS IT'S 17 GAMES!!!!!" have me questioning if people have been through an actual baseball season before.

The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 10:41 AM)
The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

:notworthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 10:41 AM)
The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

 

I don't post much on this main board, but that post absolutely NAILED it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (hawkubes @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 09:28 AM)
Let's fire Ozzie and let's fire KW. I'm so sick and tired of this talk. Ozzie's a great manager (yes, he makes mistakes, who doesn't) the players want to play for him. Kenny Williams has made some great moves, i'm so tired of everybody talkin smack about KW's moves. He's doing everything he can to make the white sox a winner, and that's what they're gonna do. Let's go Sox :gosox2: :gosox1: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro: :gosoxretro:

 

I'm not sick of the negativity, just sick of this team's play so far.

My god, what a horrible start for a supposed contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kinda sick of the negativity too. What's worse is I'm even more sick of BEING negative, because I am negative. For the better part of last year and so far through spring training and thus far this season I see little to be optimistic about. Start WINNING and this negativity might go away or at least lessen. By the way, some negativity is OK, we're not Cub fans. :gosox1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 10:41 AM)
The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

 

 

Like Ordonez, Carlos Lee, Tadahito Iguchi, Shingo Takatsu, Alexei Ramirez and Dayan Viciedo?

 

If there's ONE huge issue every Sox fan SHOULD have, it's with the Wilder/Dominican fiasco and the fact we haven't been able to get any prospects out of Venezuela when it's Ozzie's homeland. Nor, in the end, has Ozzie been able to use his connections to get any free agents here, other than maybe someone like Omar Vizquel. I guess you have to give Guillen SOME credit for being able to get the Freddy Garcia deal done, that's one occasion that can be cited.

 

Who's the last Dominican prospect we developed? Jesus Pena? And for Venezuela, Clevelan Santeliz? Pretty abysmal.

 

If Sale and Beckham both become stars, that's a huge improvement from the draft picks of 2000-2007. And certainly, we've never gotten involved in a "posting war" for one of the Japanese stars, but you could argue that unless you're the Red Sox or Yankees, doing so hasn't been so wise unless we're talking about a "once in a lifetime" player in his prime like Ichiro Suzuki.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (greg775 @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 11:57 PM)
Would mlb.com laugh in my face if I asked for a refund?

Hell I've only had it about 10 games now and we're 1-9 in that span.

And thus begins the hex. Retract your evil doing you evil person! You are obviously responsible for this fowl play!!

Undo your evil deed and repent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 09:41 AM)
The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

 

Glad to see there are others who understand this. I'd also like one person to point out how the reaction of the fanbase to this start has been overly negative. It's been negative because the team is playing like s***, and there is no other way to react to that.

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 07:44 PM)
Glad to see there are others who understand this. I'd also like one person to point out how the reaction of the fanbase to this start has been overly negative. It's been negative because the team is playing like s***, and there is no other way to react to that.

 

This is nothing new. It cost us last year and may cost us again.

 

Wasn't one of the excuses for falling out of it at the end was due to the fact they had to work so hard to get back in it. Guess what it will be the excuse again this September.

Edited by Harry Chappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Apr 23, 2011 -> 09:41 AM)
The Sox are only in it every year because they have the most resources in the division (their payroll). It really has nothing to do with KW; it's actually the opposite. KW is the reason we have this ceiling where we are in it almost every year, but not winning it.

 

For all the good trades KW has made, he and this organization has drafted horrendously and developed players horrifically.

 

The Sox will never be a consistent winner with KW because the Sox don't draft and develop. Unless you can spend like the Yankees and Red Sox, you need to draft and develop well. And actually the Sawks and Yankees do draft and develop well. It's also boggles my mind that the Sox are willing to spend so much on payroll yet they consistently neglect spending on foreign free agents and the draft.

I don't know why this isn't addressed more often, but a big problem with the drafting and development, at least in my opinion, seems to be Reinsdorf's relationship with Selig. JR seems to instruct our Player Development department to follow Selig's "slot system," whereas teams that you mentioned do not. They pay over slot money to compensate for their poor draft position and thus get players they have no business getting at their position in the draft. Meanwhile, we take the guy that is willing to sign for slot money, and in the instances we do take a guy that is a signability risk, we don't seem to ever get him signed.

 

I feel like we could vastly improve our drafting if we were willing to tell Bud that we can't continue to play by these "guidelines" if we continue to see the rich get richer by ignoring them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 24, 2011 -> 03:14 AM)
I don't know why this isn't addressed more often, but a big problem with the drafting and development, at least in my opinion, seems to be Reinsdorf's relationship with Selig. JR seems to instruct our Player Development department to follow Selig's "slot system," whereas teams that you mentioned do not. They pay over slot money to compensate for their poor draft position and thus get players they have no business getting at their position in the draft. Meanwhile, we take the guy that is willing to sign for slot money, and in the instances we do take a guy that is a signability risk, we don't seem to ever get him signed.

 

I feel like we could vastly improve our drafting if we were willing to tell Bud that we can't continue to play by these "guidelines" if we continue to see the rich get richer by ignoring them.

 

Absolutely, meanwhile KC and Detroit stack up their farm systems by going way over slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...