Baron Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 09:50 PM) I also wonder if Casey Close is using the Sox as leverage against the Royals. Not saying that's the case at all, but I wonder... I'm almost positive that's going on in most negotiations(but that's not to say that they arent willing to accept the White Sox's offer). But the Royals are in a weird place right now. They are about to have a ton of talent hit free agency in 17 and I believe 18 as well. Edited December 24, 2015 by Baron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 09:50 PM) I also wonder if Casey Close is using the Sox as leverage against the Royals. Not saying that's the case at all, but I wonder... My initial thought as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 03:50 AM) I also wonder if Casey Close is using the Sox as leverage against the Royals. Not saying that's the case at all, but I wonder... but one has to wonder .... it is a great strategy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 07:41 PM) Didnt Dan just say a few weeks ago that the team might not add anyone after Lawrie? Them giving up Shark's draft pick wouldnt make his drum beating articles over them not doing that look good. Dan refuted the interest in Frazier after the Lawrie trade, then said he was overpriced & it wouldn't happen. Now he's saying they won't go after any of the big bats, especially the ones with a pick attached. Yet, multiple national writers have said the exact opposite. This stance he keeps taking is going to blow up in his face very soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 09:50 PM) I also wonder if Casey Close is using the Sox as leverage against the Royals. Not saying that's the case at all, but I wonder... If he is any good as an agent, I would hope he is. That being said, money talks and there is a certain figure Gordon needs to stay in Kansas City. They don't seem willing to reach it yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Everything that I've read is saying KC isn't even close with Gordon. Seen some say they are all but out of the running. We'll see what happens. I think Sox have the inside track here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 09:50 PM) I also wonder if Casey Close is using the Sox as leverage against the Royals. Not saying that's the case at all, but I wonder... If that is the case, hopefully we make them pay up and add a 5th or 6th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 11:02 PM) That's the thing, if that is what is happening, everyone but the Royals win. 1. The price goes up for the Royals, which help the White Sox, Casey Close and Gordon 2. It makes the Sox look like major players in the FA market, which gets the fans excited If I'm Hahn and I got that call from Close, I'd be 100% OK with their camp leaking out that story. I have no problem with any of that. Especially the part where the Royals eat it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 11:05 PM) I have no problem with any of that. Especially the part where the Royals eat it. They are going to eat it next year anyway. Meet Scott Boras. I'd rather take a player away from them and get the ship to start sinking. Edited December 24, 2015 by Baron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 11:33 PM) Dan refuted the interest in Frazier after the Lawrie trade, then said he was overpriced & it wouldn't happen. Now he's saying they won't go after any of the big bats, especially the ones with a pick attached. Yet, multiple national writers have said the exact opposite. This stance he keeps taking is going to blow up in his face very soon. I don't pay attention to him. He's not reporting anything with any true inside insight. He downplays moves every year and is super conservative. Did it last offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 09:16 PM) I don't pay attention to him. He's not reporting anything with any true inside insight. He downplays moves every year and is super conservative. Did it last offseason. All I know is he has made it very obvious that he has no idea what is going on but is getting paid to act like he does. He's been wrong multiple times this offseason & if any of these reports come out to be true, he'll be wrong again on the OF'er front. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 12:18 AM) All I know is he has made it very obvious that he has no idea what is going on but is getting paid to act like he does. He's been wrong multiple times this offseason & if any of these reports come out to be true, he'll be wrong again on the OF'er front. I just go with the opposite of what he says. Hell I think it was Merkin that had a story of some sort about Frazier a day or so before we got him. I thought it was odd...then boom! We got him. Edited December 24, 2015 by SouthSideSale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vance Law Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 23, 2015 -> 05:59 PM) I'd offer Gordon 4/70 and if he declines, f*** him and go all in for Cespedes or Upton. Those guys are asking for twice as much as that. And they're not twice as good as Gordon. And I wouldn't bet on either of them to be better than Gordon next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peavy44 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 When will these guys sign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 my guess is next week or after new years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peavy44 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Real @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 12:15 AM) my guess is next week or after new years Maybe Alex Gordon signs with the White Sox today. Edited December 24, 2015 by peavy44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (peavy44 @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 01:06 AM) When will these guys sign? Today at 11:30 Edited December 24, 2015 by SouthSideSale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/i...fs-al-central-2 Schoenfield's Path to the Playoffs for the AL Central teams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) I'd bet we're waiting until after New Years for any of these outfielders to sign. Edited December 24, 2015 by Rowand44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I predict a 5-year, $90 million deal for Gordon announced in 90 minutes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 If the Royals don't resign Gordon, with their current roster I don't see them as much more than a .500 team. Cleveland is the team to beat right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyAcosta41 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) Perhaps this is how it's playing out: RH (to Gordon's agent, Casey Close): We want your guy. We also want the PR spike that comes from a holiday gift for our fans. 4/$72 ($18M AV). Very strong offer. If you need that 5th year, it's 5/$80 ($16M AV). Offer open until 12/30, but then we move on. Get your guy to join next year's division champ. And he won't have to flail at Sale. Edited December 24, 2015 by CyAcosta41 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_Thomas Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (CyAcosta41 @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 08:17 AM) Perhaps this is how it's playing out: RH (to Gordon's agent, Casey Close): We want your guy. We also want the PR spike that comes from a holiday gift for our fans. 4/$72 ($18M AV). Very strong offer. If you need that 5th year, it's 5/$80 ($16M AV). Offer open until 12/30, but then we move on. Get your guy to join next year's division champ. And he won't have to flail at Sale. Unfortuantely with the reports out there, that AV you suggest is not going to be enough to to sign him. If we were offering that he would just go back to the Royals, but according to Heyman AGs camp told them as of now they are out because they were offering basically the same contract you just suggested. If the money is close he'll go back to KC, the only way he leaves is if he gets more money, closer to the $20 mil/year or if he gets that 5th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyAcosta41 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Frank_Thomas35 @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 08:37 AM) Unfortuantely with the reports out there, that AV you suggest is not going to be enough to to sign him. If we were offering that he would just go back to the Royals, but according to Heyman AGs camp told them as of now they are out because they were offering basically the same contract you just suggested. If the money is close he'll go back to KC, the only way he leaves is if he gets more money, closer to the $20 mil/year or if he gets that 5th year. All "reports" I've seen had the AG group seeking 5 years at an AAV of $20K per and the Royals "allegedly" offering 4 years at an AAV of $12-13M. Of course, all agents and clubs use the press for leverage and obfuscation. However, if the above reports are true or nearly so, then letting Gordon choose between 4/$72M and 5/$80M is quite a bit better than anything the Royals have on the table. Personally, my belief is that with all the younger talent coming up for the Royals who need to be signed the next 1-2 years, they've got a line in the sand pegged for Gordon. At or below that line, they'll welcome back their native son with open arms. Above that line, they'll feel the need to be disciplined for the priorities that Hosmer, Perez, and Moustakas have over AG because of age, position, or both. I think the Royals ceiling is likely $15-16M AAV. I haven't seen anything that suggests they've offered nearly that high (which is why his agent is likely working hard to create the reality or illusion of a market). I think a White Sox offer of 4/$72M or 5/$80M is likely $10M or more better than what the Royals would offer. That's likely enough to get him to move to the Dark Side. And if necessary, I'd bump it up to 4/$76M or 5/$85M. KC is in the proverbial pickle. Gordon is ripe for the plucking. Get 'er done, Rick. Edited December 24, 2015 by CyAcosta41 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shago Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Dec 24, 2015 -> 06:24 AM) I predict a 5-year, $90 million deal for Gordon announced in 90 minutes Let's go Santa, make it happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.