QUOTE(EvilMonkey @ Jun 18, 2005 -> 11:07 PM)
I am saying that whenever a program is taken over by the government, it grows exponentially because there are crooks on all sides that want to get their 'piece of the pie', paperwork will increase and productivity will go down.
So if I understand your statements, we could not run the program any better than Canada? Paperwork may go up, but with only one payer (us), versus hundreds of payers (insurance companies) it may be easier to follow and ultimately go down. I don't think we'd hire all new Doctors, Nurses, hospital administrators, etc.
The whole "our government is incompetent" thinking is one of the bad cards the GOP picked up. How they can continue to make statements that basically say we suck at running things, and get elected, just boggles my mind. Yet if Kip made that statement, we would be jumping down his throat faster than one of those lumberjacks in that thing they, and ESPN, call a sport.
One area I would like to see some improvement in our health care system is to help small business compete for the better employees. Business owners like Evil are not going to outsource to Malasia. They are going to hire locally and keep the jobs locally. However, they are also at a huge disadvantage in health insurance rates. Small groups are almost impossible to insure and the premiums are usually high. One way to help small business' grow, is in health care.
It is also tough in some industries like mine that employ people at the lower end of the pay scale. I was looking at one plan for my emplyees and it was costing almost $600/month per employee for single coverage. That is $3.75 per hour added to a $7.25 per hour employee.