Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Texsox

Admin
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Texsox

  1. Oh s***, sucks to be him.
  2. We do not pay taxes to pay for any government program. If we actually paid for government programs, why would Bush cut taxes while increasing spending?
  3. QUOTE (FlaSoxxJim @ Jul 4, 2008 -> 10:25 AM) That's easy, Stren 4lb test on an Shakespeare Ugly Stick with a good old Zebco 33. Oh, wait. you meant bass, not bass, didn't you. My bad. Well pards that may work for sissy Yankee bass, but down here in the Lone Star state, y'all better bring some man size gear. Perhaps a Shimano Curado baitcasting reel on a G-Loomis rod spooled with 20lb test Spiderwire.
  4. Happy Birthday!
  5. Texsox replied to shipps's topic in SLaM
    I was just listening to the radio and was reminded of another brilliant thing to do, shoot your gun into the air! Yep, down here tonight guys (it's always guys) will aim into the sky and let a few rounds go. And they will come down, and usually someone is hurt.
  6. Texsox replied to shipps's topic in SLaM
    Where in Texas are you? Seriously, I agree 100%. Leave the fireworks to the professionals.
  7. And no way we could do something better then Canada!
  8. QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 3, 2008 -> 08:14 PM) i had no idea radio personalities were responsible for this much revenue. Seems that asking a music station to spend $5,000 on the 24/7 music they play is a bargain
  9. QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 4, 2008 -> 04:54 AM) well, the fact that the Dodgers only offered Loaiza for Uribe should be an indication of how much they thought of Uribe. Or how much they thought we thought of Loaiza. I think yours is closer, but do not estimate the chances of finding a GM who is over valuing someone in your system.
  10. Texsox replied to HuskyCaucasian's topic in SLaM
    QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 07:50 AM) Yes, its Tesla, as in Nikola Tesla, one of the true geniuses of the 20th centurty. Screw Thomas Edison, this guy was responsible for some of the greatest inventions and innovations of our time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla most underrated scientist ever.
  11. A town decides to not spend the town's money on a play that the town's citizens may find offensive. People outside the town, demand that the play be staged "for the good of those citizens". That is civility and manners. Too bad manners and civility are no longer in fashion. This play would be great staged somewhere other than in a public park. So now public parks must be R-rated? When people cannot differentiate between a good time and a place for something and a poor time and place for something, the rest of the world should just go along with it? I'm done. It's obvious why this place becomes such a hell hole at times.
  12. QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 05:13 PM) what is this great argument you think you are making? Yes then, there is a difference between starting to stage a musical then stopping because the award winning musical that families can go see "RagTime" has the N word in it. Because another theatre might not choose it for legitimate reasons like staging or cost, not because they are worried about a hypothetical scenario that would be easily explained anyway. If only the play had just excessive violence, then it'd go on without a hitch. I thought I was writing clearly, but since you still don't understand my "great" argument, let me try one more time: I believe that not offending people in an open air public park is a legitimate reason. It use to be called manners and civility. You obviously disagree. I believe that parents have a fair expectation when visiting a public park to not have their young children exposed, by a staged event, to concepts that may be beyond their understanding. You disagree. It would seem that you think anyone should be allowed to subject your children to whatever language, concepts, etc. they want. I disagree. So they decided, for their audience, a different musical would be better. You disagree.
  13. QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 05:02 PM) Well I respect that they have a right not to stage a play but that doesn't mean I have to compliment them and pat them on their back, tell them this production of High School Musical was wonderful for EVERYONE. How many musicals will be staged by park districts this summer at out door venues in the US? Would you also condemn those theaters that never even considered this work? So applaud those that stage this musical and condemn everyone else. If you were staging a play outdoors, in a park, you would not be concerned about EVERYONE? Is there any venue you would? I would think that a park, open to the public, should have GP rated entertainment.
  14. QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 05:55 PM) what a silly loaded last line. They aren't putting on a musical version of Paul verheoven's Showgirls, this is a fantastic piece of theatre that would be very intellectually stimulating and entertaining for the crowd. And I think some of you underestimate the importance of funding cultural programs. Let's assume it is the single greatest musical ever produced in the history of theater. Does ever theater have the responsibility to stage the musical? Again, the same group that looked into it, decided against it. Why are they more wrong then groups that never even considered it? And is every play appropriate for every audience and every venue? What is wrong with deciding that this is not suitable for children and staging something else?
  15. QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 05:53 PM) As I stated in the post above the play in its entirety is not nearly as offensive as you seem to be under the impression it is. It's not like we're talking about an episode of South Park here. It's not, but a respect their right to not stage the play. This was not a case where someone wanted to stage it and was told no. The same group that looked into it, decided against it.
  16. Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in SLaM
    QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 05:49 PM) Where's the picture of the sharks and barracudas eating? Best estimates are 1 in 333 live to reproduce, back on the same section of beach. I was thinking as a fundraiser they should have painted numbers on the back and taken bets. There was also concerns about the gulls that were circling.
  17. What does this say about the liberal media?
  18. Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in SLaM
  19. Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in SLaM
  20. Texsox posted a topic in SLaM
    The northern Mexico coast and southern Texas is the nesting ground for several endangered species of Sea Turtles. Volunteers patrol the beaches looking for nesting females and retrieve the eggs and incubate them. Later they are released. This year they have found over 50 nests, double the previous year's best. What is also very cool is a leatherback nested foir the first time in 70 years just north of here. http://www.seaturtleinc.com/
  21. QUOTE (Reddy @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 10:49 AM) whoa i think you're way off base this time. as an actor, the POINT of theatre is not just to entertain but to provoke discussion, create change, enlighten, etc. The point of theatre, just like any art, is to SAY something. Fluff musicals do serve a purpose, and that's what Broadway's mostly become these days, but why should governmentally funded projects be limited to this fluff? I'd argue it should be the other way around. The gov't should fund theatre that is educational and teaches us something or at least opens our minds up to looking at something in a different way. I do not believe that every park district that puts on a play needs to follow that same mission statement of enlightening, offending, creating change, etc. I believe there is room for non controversial, family entertainment, and that is what a park district should be involved in. GP rated events that the entire family can enjoy. Believe it or not, there are volumes of plays by Simon, Williams, Shepard, O'Neil, Miller, etc that could be staged. But I've come to accept that around here the consensus is that insulting, offending, is always preferred to something less controversial.
  22. No one was demanding they stage this musical. During the process, they decided it was not right for the venue. So they are being criticized here for being sensitive to people. It wasn't as if someone wanted to stage the play and were told no. The same group that originally thought they would, then decided not to. Are they any worse then groups that never even considered the play? It's a shame when being considerate to citizens feelings is the wrong thing to do. There are thousands of musicals they can show in place of this. Ones that the group performing are more comfortable with.
  23. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 2, 2008 -> 07:53 AM) Flaxxing the Dogg?
  24. Shall we also condemn every theater group in the country that has not produced this musical? I believe publicly funded projects like this should stick to entertainment not social education. I think it is reasonable for a family to be able to walk through the park without a government funded musical singing racial insults.
  25. QUOTE (FlaSoxxJim @ Jul 1, 2008 -> 06:49 PM) Favorite euphemisms for masturbation? Or How Jim Spends His Saturday Afternoons . . .

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.