Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

caulfield12

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by caulfield12

  1. rodon a pretty good comp...whether he can keep increasing velo from beginning to end of outings will be something to watch rodon a bit more dominant physically
  2. Schultz and Smith both have nasty sliders. Smith's FB isn't quite a dominant pitch yet...pretty straight.
  3. Have to pay attention to runner there.
  4. Inexcusable there.
  5. Royce Clayton the equivalent of Jose Valentin compared to Amaya.
  6. Makes you appreciate Altuve or Pedroia a lot more.
  7. Meidroth not impressing so far.
  8. Lee always hustles at least.
  9. Rojas is so much better at third. Amaya or Baldwin can play SS to start with.
  10. Montgomery doesn't make that play.
  11. Nice play by Brosseau more of a 1B DH historically. Vargas pulling every ball on the ground after Stone forecasted just that on the Peralta sinker.
  12. Did he just say stars like Andrew Vaughn?
  13. 49 strike outs on the early spring
  14. After a three-up, three-down second, Sasaki seemed to lose some steam in the third inning, bookending a well-struck drive from White Sox prospect Tim Elko with a pair of walks to end his outing. Get tickets: Dick Allen bobble, Comiskey Park radio & much more "It's exciting for those guys to compete against Sasaki and the other pitchers today," White Sox director of player development Paul Janish said. "Pretty cool to be part of the first time [Sasaki] faced opposing hitters. We are hopeful both of those guys (Teel/Elko) give themselves a chance to play in the Major Leagues this season." mlb.com
  15. And famously expressed zero interest in Ohtani and basically tepid interest in Bryce Harper based upon those abbreviated negotiations.
  16. They will need to come up with $500 million to $1 billion for a new stadium as well...at least 50% or more of the costs. If they ever want to build back the value of their media rights they can't run a team out there without a single star player. Baseball...after all, is an entertainment-based endeavor.
  17. What other solution is there? Waiting on uncertain minor league prospects is far from guaranteed. It worked for KC Houston Cubs in the previous generation of rebuilding teams...but look at where the Sox Padres and Blue Jays are right now. Sox have hopefully bottomed out, but the other two are in pretty precarious positions.
  18. https://futurestarsseries.com/mlb-top-100-prospects-walcott-painter-schultz-basallo-red-sox-tigers-mariners/ Biggest take here is Braden with one of his highest rankings and Colson one of his lowest besides Law... Mariners with 7 in Top 100. Dodgers obviously right up there.
  19. Ho would they get enough small time investors to even add up to $50-100 million? The Packers' "public" ownership situation is far more complicated than that appearance. Even the Boston Celtics issued stock/shares in her 80s and 90s.
  20. The "cash call" for futute stadium investment funds (if they don't sell out this week to Ishbia at a $1.8 billion valuation) makes sense... "The minority owners may not have the cash available or want to put up the cash for a new stadium. Thus, they sell to someone like Ishbia (or Hobson) who has the cash to meet this capital call. I’m not a corporate lawyer, but looking at all this together, it seems like some sort of succession plan is forming. The owners are selling to, essentially, richer people so the richer people can raise cash to build a new stadium. Jerry seems to be making a plan to transfer operational control. The new era of the White Sox is forming in front of our eyes. It looks pretty good honestly." soxmachine.com comments
  21. Already way behind in RS/RA allowed standings. Dodgers and DBacks only team with -10 to -19 range. White Sox at -26 last time I checked.
  22. https://www.kgw.com/video/sports/locked-on/lo-chicago/white-sox-show/justin-ishbias-white-sox-involvement-could-mean-a-new-ballpark-is-on-the-horizon-or-something-more/535-7005de66-f9a3-4b3f-9acf-4ce055905d96 I don't have headphones at work....what does this say? Just idle journalistic speculation? Justin Ishbia's White Sox involvement could mean a new ballpark is on the horizon or something more... The report on Friday has left us, as Sox fans, with more questions than answers, that's for sure. The hope is that there is a light at the end of the tunnel, and the promise of better days is right in front of us. I still struggle to believe that Justin Ishbia abandoned his opportunity to have 100% control of a Major League franchise to simply increase his shares of the White Sox, continue to be a silent partner, and maybe just help provide funding for a new stadium. There has to be more. Of course, the team can't say that he is the heir apparent to controlling our favorite baseball team, but why else would he do this? Why would we know specific dollar amounts and deadlines and that an investment firm based in Chicago is brokering the deal if this was just merely increasing minority shares? Jerry Reinsdorf turned 89 years old today. He has everything he could possibly want in his life, so it's time he did something for Sox fans and gave us the gift of ownership that values winning above all else. With all of this in mind, if Justin Ishbia increases his stakes in the team, is it unreasonable to think he would want to start signing real players and looking to turn around this team? But would his desire to improve the on-field product lead to strife with Jerry and other remaining partners? We all know Jerry has a four-decade history of suppressing salaries and has valued profit margins above playoff appearances, but Justin Ishbia looks to be the polar opposite. Would these opposing viewpoints lead to internal conflict? Or could Ishbia's deep pockets alleviate Jerry's worries when it comes to handing out market-value contracts in the current baseball world? https://ontapsportsnet.com/mlb/ishbia-white-sox-ownership-stake-increase-sparks-hope
  23. It would be weird to only focus on his strikeouts (negatively), or ONLY focus on his two well-hit balls off fastballs (one off Thielbar, the homer...the other today in his 3rd at-bat that was a line-up with high EV and probability of being a hit if it wasn't right at the outfielder. In that case, he would be hitting .286 instead of .143 and there would be less "sighing/exasperation" over every little thing he does/has done. That said, anointing him as a possibility to start the season at SS has put some additional pressure on him, in terms of media and fan expectations. Not sure that was really necessary...maybe they feel they need to challenge him? Whatever works as motivation...God knows what they did with Vaughn and Sheets these years, because they never REALLY risked losing their spot on the team no matter what they did or didn't do on the field of play.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.