Lip Man 1 Posted yesterday at 01:48 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:48 AM Brad Biggs' the Tribune Bears beat writer offers his thoughts: "Seriously, as best I understand the situation, the Bears are eyeing the possibility of putting up a stadium in Hammond. Either that or before lawmakers return to Springfield in 2026, the team is attempting a leverage play as it seeks public funding for infrastructure around Arlington Heights that could approach $1 billion as well as tax breaks. “This is not about leverage,” Warren wrote in the letter. If you have to say it’s not about leverage, it’s only about leverage. The franchise’s stadium pursuit has become such a flip-flop operation, at this point it’s literally all over the map. Pick a town, any town." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago And to bring this full circle, thanks to watching some PBS/Geoffrey Baer, DYK that the Chicago Bears Soldier Field was built on a (wait for it... wait for it...) literal garbage landfill as it was originally about 150 yards into Lake Michigan, but was where people dumped their trash during the early years of Chicago. They drove pilings through the trash piles and into bedrock to anchor the stadium. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said: And to bring this full circle, thanks to watching some PBS/Geoffrey Baer, DYK that the Chicago Bears Soldier Field was built on a (wait for it... wait for it...) literal garbage landfill as it was originally about 150 yards into Lake Michigan, but was where people dumped their trash during the early years of Chicago. They drove pilings through the trash piles and into bedrock to anchor the stadium. Was it "trash", or debris from the Chicago Fire? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 6 minutes ago, WestEddy said: Was it "trash", or debris from the Chicago Fire? According to Popular Mechanics it was a Streeter garbage dump. This is is someone copying the original article which is paywalled. https://theyawningchasm.com/2021/08/02/the-pungent-history-of-americas-garbage-mountains/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago I support the Bears moving to NWI. Hammond makes a lot of sense. Arlington Heights is not that convenient for me or most Sox fans. North siders will just have to deal with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Green Line said: I support the Bears moving to NWI. Hammond makes a lot of sense. Arlington Heights is not that convenient for me or most Sox fans. North siders will just have to deal with it. I'm told the Bears are meeting with the Indiana officials on January 6. I would think if Indiana comes up with the money package the Bears are looking for and Illinois doesn't, the Bears will go to Indiana. The latest thing I've heard is the Bears should try to purchase Soldier Field from the Park District , knock it down and build the dome stadium at the site. I think we're going to find out soon what the Bears are going to do. They want to start building the new stadium in 2026. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, WBWSF said: I'm told the Bears are meeting with the Indiana officials on January 6. I would think if Indiana comes up with the money package the Bears are looking for and Illinois doesn't, the Bears will go to Indiana. The latest thing I've heard is the Bears should try to purchase Soldier Field from the Park District , knock it down and build the dome stadium at the site. I think we're going to find out soon what the Bears are going to do. They want to start building the new stadium in 2026. If the Bears go to Indiana it will be just like the Giants and Jets playing in New Jersey. They are still the New York teams and the Bears will still be Chicago's team. I wouldn't lose any sleep over this (nor will I lose any sleep over the "reports" the Sox are moving to Nashville!) 🤡 The Bears will get the cooperation from Illinois politicians when they come up with a way to pay off the outstanding money still owed from the renovations in 2002 not before that's been made very clear in published statements to the media. Edited 17 hours ago by Lip Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 17 hours ago, Lip Man 1 said: Brad Biggs' the Tribune Bears beat writer offers his thoughts: "Seriously, as best I understand the situation, the Bears are eyeing the possibility of putting up a stadium in Hammond. Either that or before lawmakers return to Springfield in 2026, the team is attempting a leverage play as it seeks public funding for infrastructure around Arlington Heights that could approach $1 billion as well as tax breaks. “This is not about leverage,” Warren wrote in the letter. If you have to say it’s not about leverage, it’s only about leverage. The franchise’s stadium pursuit has become such a flip-flop operation, at this point it’s literally all over the map. Pick a town, any town." Jerry is probably impressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Dome football is awful. So is dome baseball. I think the Bears should stay where they are. The new stadium isnt for the fans, its just so greedy owners can have more luxury boxes. Same for Sox.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 3 hours ago, southsider2k5 said: And to bring this full circle, thanks to watching some PBS/Geoffrey Baer, DYK that the Chicago Bears Soldier Field was built on a (wait for it... wait for it...) literal garbage landfill as it was originally about 150 yards into Lake Michigan, but was where people dumped their trash during the early years of Chicago. They drove pilings through the trash piles and into bedrock to anchor the stadium. Yep, I watched the most recent Geoffrey Baer lakefront show and Michigan Ave was right on the lakefront in the mid-1800s. There's a discussion about this beginning at around 5:25 in the video below. Later in the show, they talk about the whole Streeterville area that was basically a sandbar. But it doesn't matter how many times this is explained. One particular poster will continue to throw a tantrum whenever someone suggests that a structure can be built on the 78. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Green Line said: Dome football is awful. So is dome baseball. I think the Bears should stay where they are. The new stadium isnt for the fans, its just so greedy owners can have more luxury boxes. Same for Sox.0 That's been the criticism of the current Sox stadium for 35 years. That's why there are 3 luxury levels before you even get to row 1 of the upper deck at Rate Field. A new Sox stadium would almost certainly not have a 21 row hike to upper deck seats. Edited 13 hours ago by 77 Hitmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago The Chiefs have announced that they are moving across state lines and into a new domed stadium and mixed-use district on the Kansas side of the KC metro area. It'll be in Kansas City, Kansas. There is currently a speedway, a casino, and a shopping mall at that location. https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/live-updates-kansas-officials-set-to-review-financing-plan-for-chiefs-stadium The Chiefs have been at Arrowhead Stadium since 1972, just about as long as the Bears have been at Soldier Field (1971). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, 77 Hitmen said: The Chiefs have announced that they are moving across state lines and into a new domed stadium and mixed-use district on the Kansas side of the KC metro area. It'll be in Kansas City, Kansas. There is currently a speedway, a casino, and a shopping mall at that location. https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/live-updates-kansas-officials-set-to-review-financing-plan-for-chiefs-stadium The Chiefs have been at Arrowhead Stadium since 1972, just about as long as the Bears have been at Soldier Field (1971). Once the Chiefs move to Kansas, I wonder if they're going to still be called the Kansas City Chiefs or the Kansas Chiefs. Edited 8 hours ago by WBWSF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, WBWSF said: Once the Chiefs move to Kansas, I wonder if they're going to still be called the Kansas City Chiefs or the Kansas Chiefs. Does it matter? Seriously. How about the Hammond Steel Bears? 😆 The Giants play in new jersey they are still called the New York Giants a la the New York Jets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 9 hours ago, Lip Man 1 said: If the Bears go to Indiana it will be just like the Giants and Jets playing in New Jersey. They are still the New York teams and the Bears will still be Chicago's team. I wouldn't lose any sleep over this (nor will I lose any sleep over the "reports" the Sox are moving to Nashville!) 🤡 The Bears will get the cooperation from Illinois politicians when they come up with a way to pay off the outstanding money still owed from the renovations in 2002 not before that's been made very clear in published statements to the media. What would be the negative economic impact for Illinois if the Bears left Chicago for Northwest Indiana? Who would be a good source to talk about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 4 minutes ago, The Beast said: What would be the negative economic impact for Illinois if the Bears left Chicago for Northwest Indiana? Who would be a good source to talk about this? Crain's Business Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, WBWSF said: Once the Chiefs move to Kansas, I wonder if they're going to still be called the Kansas City Chiefs or the Kansas Chiefs. That would be idiotic. Almost as idiotic as KCK Chiefs. Most of that city is like East St Louis. Then you have Johnson County suburbs and Wyandotte "countryside"...which is where they would be in actuality. Edited 7 hours ago by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Hitmen Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, WBWSF said: Once the Chiefs move to Kansas, I wonder if they're going to still be called the Kansas City Chiefs or the Kansas Chiefs. The reported location of their new stadium will be in the municipality of Kansas City, Kansas. Why would they drop "City" from their name when their home field will be literally in a town named Kansas City? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeC Posted 30 minutes ago Share Posted 30 minutes ago 8 hours ago, WBWSF said: Once the Chiefs move to Kansas, I wonder if they're going to still be called the Kansas City Chiefs or the Kansas Chiefs. The Kansas City Chiefs of Kansas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.